Quadrant Edge Orifice Performance-Effect of Upstream Velocity Distribution

1962 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Bogema ◽  
Bradford Spring ◽  
M. V. Ramamoorthy
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Velocity Distribution ◽  
Lower Limit ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Performance Effect ◽  
Coefficient Variation ◽  
Discharge Coefficients

Quadrant edge orifices offer constant discharge coefficients to much lower Reynolds numbers than do sharp edge orifices, nozzles, or venturi meters. Published results show different values for the lower limit of constancy. This paper presents experimental results which indicate that at flows below pipe Reynolds number of 4000 the discharge coefficient variation is related to the degree of velocity profile development in the upstream meter run.

New Discharge Coefficient of Throat Tap Nozzle Based on ASME Performance Test Code 6 for Reynolds Number From 2.4 × 105 to 1.4 × 107

2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
Kar-Hooi Cheong ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
National Metrology Institute ◽  
Reference Curve ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients

The throat tap nozzle of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers performance test code (ASME PTC) 6 is widely used in engineering fields, and its discharge coefficient is normally estimated by an extrapolation in Reynolds number range higher than the order of 107. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new relation between the discharge coefficient of the throat tap nozzle and Reynolds number by a detailed analysis of the experimental data and the theoretical models, which can be applied to Reynolds numbers up to 1.5 × 107. The discharge coefficients are measured for several tap diameters in Reynolds numbers ranging from 2.4 × 105 to 1.4 × 107 using the high Reynolds number calibration rig of the National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ). Experimental results show that the discharge coefficients depend on the tap diameter and the deviation between the experimental results and the reference curve of PTC 6 is 0.75% at maximum. New equations to estimate the discharge coefficient are developed based on the experimental results and the theoretical equations including the tap effects. The developed equations estimate the discharge coefficient of the present experimental data within 0.21%, and they are expected to estimate more accurately the discharge coefficient of the throat tap nozzle of PTC 6 than the reference curve of PTC 6.

Development of High Accurate Flow Nozzle for Feedwater Flowrate Measurement in Nuclear Power Plant

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
KarHooi Cheong ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
High Reynolds Numbers ◽  
High Reynolds ◽  
Extrapolation Error

The high accurate throat tap flow nozzle with four different diameter taps is developed and its discharge coefficients are measured in the Reynolds number range from 1.5×106 to 1.4×107 using the high Reynolds calibration facility of AIST,NMIJ. The discharge coefficient of a throat tap nozzle extrapolated according to ASME PTC 6 are confirmed to deviate 0.37% at Red=1.4×107 from the experimental results. The high accurate flow nozzle developed can reduce this extrapolation error of the discharge coefficient to high Reynolds numbers by using the equations of discharge coefficients, which is determined as a function of Reynolds number and tap diameter based on the experimental results of four different diameter taps. The error of extrapolated discharge coefficient using the derived equations is estimated to be less than 0.1% at Red=1.4×107. The present results show that the throat tap flow nozzle developed is expected to work as a high accurate flowmeter even under the extrapolation of the discharge coefficient toward high Reynolds numbers.

Experimental Results of Flow Nozzle Based on PTC 6 for High Reynolds Number

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Furuichi ◽  
Kar-Hooi Cheong ◽  
Yoshiya Terao ◽  
Shinichi Nakao ◽  
Keiji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
High Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Reynolds Number Range ◽  
Lower Reynolds Number ◽  
High Reynolds

Discharge coefficients for three flow nozzles based on ASME PTC 6 are measured under many flow conditions at AIST, NMIJ and PTB. The uncertainty of the measurements is from 0.04% to 0.1% and the Reynolds number range is from 1.3×105 to 1.4×107. The discharge coefficients obtained by these experiments is not exactly consistent to one given by PTC 6 for all examined Reynolds number range. The discharge coefficient is influenced by the size of tap diameter even if at the lower Reynolds number region. Experimental results for the tap of 5 mm and 6 mm diameter do not satisfy the requirements based on the validation procedures and the criteria given by PTC 6. The limit of the size of tap diameter determined in PTC 6 is inconsistent with the validation check procedures of the calibration result. An enhanced methodology including the term of the tap diameter is recommended. Otherwise, it is recommended that the calibration test should be performed at as high Reynolds number as possible and the size of tap diameter is desirable to be as small as possible to obtain the discharge coefficient with high accuracy.

A Theory of Sharp-Edged Orifices

1937 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. A53-A54
Author(s):  
W. E. Howland
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Circular Orifice ◽  
Coefficient Of Discharge ◽  
Theoretical Considerations ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract The author presents a figure in which the coefficient of discharge Cd, velocity Cv, and contraction Cc determined by several investigators are plotted logarithmically as points against Reynolds’ numbers. Curves for the coefficients drawn by the author, based on theoretical considerations, show good agreement with the experimental data, thus throwing some light upon the basic phenomena of the discharge of sharp-edged orifices. The variation of the coefficient of discharge of a circular orifice as a function of the Reynolds number is explained as a purely viscous phenomenon for low Reynolds numbers, and by means of a momentum analysis for higher speeds. The analysis presented by the author leads to the development of several formulas for the discharge coefficient, which formulas are in fair agreement with experimental results.

A Reassessment of Metering Orifices for Low Reynolds Numbers

1965 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Kastner ◽  
J. C. McVeigh
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Low Reynolds

In view of the importance of accurate measurement of flow rate at low Reynolds numbers, there have been numerous attempts to develop metering devices having constant discharge coefficients in the range of pipe Reynolds numbers between about 3000 and 200 and even below this latter value, and some of these attempts have achieved a reasonable degrees of success. Nevertheless, some confusion exists regarding the dimensions and range of utility of certain designs which have been recommended and further information is necessary in order that the situation may be clarified. The aims of the present investigation, which is believed to be wider in scope than any published in this field in recent years, were to review and correlate existing knowledge and to make an experimental study of the properties of various types of orifice in the low range of Reynolds numbers. Arising from this it was hoped that a design might be evolved which not only had a satisfactorily constant discharge coefficient throughout the range but was also simple to manufacture and reproduce, even for small orifice diameters of the order of 0.5 in or less, and it is believed that some success in attaining this aim was achieved. The first section of the paper contains a review of previous investigations classified into three main groups. In the second part of the paper, experiments with various types of orifice plate are described and it is shown that a properly proportioned single-bevelled orifice has as good a performance in the low Reynolds number range as that of any of the more complicated shapes.

Loss Characteristics of Orifices and Nozzles

1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Alvi ◽  
K. Sridharan ◽  
N. S. Lakshmana Rao
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Flow Regime ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Critical Reynolds Number ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Center Line ◽  
Laminar Regime ◽  
Variation Of Parameters ◽  
Turbulent Flow Regime

Loss characteristics of sharp-edged orifices, quadrant-edged orifices for varying edge radii, and nozzles are studied for Reynolds numbers less than 10,000 for β ratios from 0.2 to 0.8. The results may be reliably extrapolated to higher Reynolds numbers. Presentation of losses as a percentage of meter pressure differential shows that the flow can be identified into fully laminar regime, critical Reynolds number regime, relaminarization regime, and turbulent flow regime. An integrated picture of variation of parameters such as discharge coefficient, loss coefficient, settling length, pressure recovery length, and center line velocity confirms this classification.

The Ratio of the Wall Shear Stresses in Concentric Annuli

1968 ◽  
Vol 72 (688) ◽  
pp. 345-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Quarmby
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Laminar Flow ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Radius Ratio ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Bulk Velocity ◽  
Shear Stresses ◽  
Wall Shear

Summary Experimental results are presented of the measurement of the ratio of the wall shear stresses at the inner and outer surfaces of concentric annuli. Five radius ratios were investigated with Reynolds numbers in the range 2000-89 000 with air. The Reynolds number is defined as where ū is the bulk velocity. It is concluded that the ratio of the shear stresses is very different from the corresponding laminar flow value and is a function of both radius ratio and Reynolds number.

Aerodynamic Loss Characteristics of a Turbine Blade With Trailing Edge Coolant Ejection: Part 1—Effect of Cut-Back Length, Spanwise Rib Spacing, Free-Stream Reynolds Number, and Chordwise Rib Length on Discharge Coefficients

2000 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oguz Uzol ◽  
Cengiz Camci ◽  
Boris Glezer
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Mass Flow Rate ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Discharge Coefficient ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Discharge Coefficients ◽  
Reynolds Number Dependency ◽  
Spanwise Rib

The internal fluid mechanics losses generated between the blade plenum chamber and a reference point located just downstream of the trailing edge are investigated for a turbine blade trailing edge cooling system. The discharge coefficient Cd is presented as a function of the free-stream Reynolds number, cut-back length, spanwise rib spacing, and chordwise rib length. The results are presented in a wide range of coolant to free-stream mass flow rate ratios. The losses from the cooling system show strong free-stream Reynolds number dependency, especially at low ejection rates, when they are correlated against the coolant to free-stream pressure ratio. However, when Cd is correlated against a coolant to free-stream mass flow rate ratio, the Reynolds number dependency is eliminated. The current data clearly show that internal viscous losses due to varying rib lengths do not differ significantly. The interaction of the external wall jet in the cutback region with the free-stream fluid is also a strong contributor to the losses. Since the discharge coefficients do not have Reynolds number dependency at high ejection rates, Cd experiments can be performed at a low free-stream Reynolds number. Running a discharge coefficient experiment at low Reynolds number (or even in still air) will sufficiently define the high blowing rate portion of the curve. This approach is extremely time efficient and economical in finding the worst possible Cd value for a given trailing edge coolant system.

Stability of non-parabolic flow in a flexible tube

1999 ◽  
Vol 395 ◽  
pp. 211-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. SHANKAR ◽  
V. KUMARAN
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Asymptotic Analysis ◽  
High Reynolds Number ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Flexible Tube ◽  
Developing Flow ◽  
Parabolic Flow ◽  
High Reynolds ◽  
The Stability

Flows with velocity profiles very different from the parabolic velocity profile can occur in the entrance region of a tube as well as in tubes with converging/diverging cross-sections. In this paper, asymptotic and numerical studies are undertaken to analyse the temporal stability of such ‘non-parabolic’ flows in a flexible tube in the limit of high Reynolds numbers. Two specific cases are considered: (i) developing flow in a flexible tube; (ii) flow in a slightly converging flexible tube. Though the mean velocity profile contains both axial and radial components, the flow is assumed to be locally parallel in the stability analysis. The fluid is Newtonian and incompressible, while the flexible wall is modelled as a viscoelastic solid. A high Reynolds number asymptotic analysis shows that the non-parabolic velocity profiles can become unstable in the inviscid limit. This inviscid instability is qualitatively different from that observed in previous studies on the stability of parabolic flow in a flexible tube, and from the instability of developing flow in a rigid tube. The results of the asymptotic analysis are extended numerically to the moderate Reynolds number regime. The numerical results reveal that the developing flow could be unstable at much lower Reynolds numbers than the parabolic flow, and hence this instability can be important in destabilizing the fluid flow through flexible tubes at moderate and high Reynolds number. For flow in a slightly converging tube, even small deviations from the parabolic profile are found to be sufficient for the present instability mechanism to be operative. The dominant non-parallel effects are incorporated using an asymptotic analysis, and this indicates that non-parallel effects do not significantly affect the neutral stability curves. The viscosity of the wall medium is found to have a stabilizing effect on this instability.

Prediction of Reynolds Number Effects on Low-Pressure Turbines Using a High-Order ILES Method

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Bolinches-Gisbert ◽  
David Cadrecha Robles ◽  
Roque Corral ◽  
Fernando Gisbert
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Fourth Order ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
High Order ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Numerical Code ◽  
Design System

Abstract A comprehensive comparison between Implicit Large Eddy Simulations (ILES) and experimental results of a modern highlift low-pressure turbine airfoil has been carried out for an array of Reynolds numbers (Re). Experimental data were obtained in a low-speed linear cascade at the Polithecnic University of Madrid using hot-wire anemometry and LDV. The numerical code is fourth order accurate, both in time and space. The spatial discretization of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations is based on a high-order Flux Reconstruction approach while a fourth order Runge-Kutta method is used to march in time the simulations. The losses, pressure coefficient distributions, and boundary layer and wake velocity profiles have been compared for an array of realistic Reynolds numbers. Moreover, boundary layer and wake velocity fluctuations are compared for the first time with experimental results. It is concluded that the accuracy of the numerical results is comparable to that of the experiments, especially for integral quantities such as the losses or exit angle. Turbulent fluctuations in the suction side boundary layer and the wakes are well predicted also. The elapsed time of the is about 140 hours on 40 Graphics Processor Units. The numerical tool is integrated within an industrial design system and reuses pre- and post-processing tools previously developed for another kind of applications. The trend of the losses with the Reynolds number has a sub-critical regime, where the losses scale with Re−1, and a supercrital regime, where the losses scale with Re−1/2. This trend can be seen both, in the simulations and the experiments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document