The Totally Supercritical Steam Cycle

1969 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Potter
Keyword(s):  
Supercritical Pressure ◽  
Heat Rejection ◽  
Working Fluids ◽  
Power Cycles ◽  
Heat Addition ◽  
Power Stations ◽  
Steam Cycle

Recently a number of new power cycles have been proposed in which heat rejection as well as heat addition has been at supercritical pressure. Although a number of working fluids have been suggested, the present study is restricted to steam. The advantages and limitations of the totally supercritical steam cycle are explored in terms of the conditions under which modern power stations operate.

Performance Analysis and Comparison Study of Transcritical Power Cycles Using CO2-Based Mixtures as Working Fluids

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxi Xia ◽  
Jiangfeng Wang ◽  
Pan Zhao ◽  
Dai Yiping
Keyword(s):  
Critical Temperature ◽  
Parametric Optimization ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Software Environment ◽  
Working Fluids ◽  
Power Cycles ◽  
Power Cycle ◽  
Thermodynamic Performance

CO2 in a transcritical CO2 cycle can not easily be condensed due to its low critical temperature (304.15K). In order to increase the critical temperature of working fluid, an effective method is to blend CO2 with other refrigerants to achieve a higher critical temperature. In this study, a transcritical power cycle using CO2-based mixtures which blend CO2 with other refrigerants as working fluids is investigated under heat source. Mathematical models are established to simulate the transcritical power cycle using different CO2-based mixtures under MATLAB® software environment. A parametric analysis is conducted under steady-state conditions for different CO2-based mixtures. In addition, a parametric optimization is carried out to obtain the optimal design parameters, and the comparisons of the transcritical power cycle using different CO2-based mixtures and pure CO2 are conducted. The results show that a raise in critical temperature can be achieved by using CO2-based mixtures, and CO2-based mixtures with R32 and R22 can also obtain better thermodynamic performance than pure CO2 in transcritical power cycle. What’s more, the condenser area needed by CO2-based mixture is smaller than pure CO2.

Cyclic Methylsiloxanes as Working Fluids for Space Power Cycles

1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Angelino ◽  
C. Invernizzi
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Working Fluids ◽  
Power Cycles ◽  
Thermodynamic Performance ◽  
High Level ◽  
Organic Fluids ◽  
Large Wheel ◽  
Turbine Exhaust ◽  
Fast Rotating

The potential merits of cyclic polymethylsiloxanes, particularly those conventionally denominated D4 and D5, as working fluids for space power cycles are discussed. The attractive technical characteristics of these substances which are fully nontoxic, moderately flammable, and stable at high temperature are presented. Some experimental results on vapor pressure and on thermal stability are reported. A maximum operating temperature of about 400°C appears achievable. A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis comparing siloxanes with other classes of high temperature fluids is performed. The peculiar characters of siloxane cycles are found to be: a good overall efficiency achieved through a massive regeneration, a moderate expansion work, and an abundant volume flow at turbine exhaust. A number of two-stage turbines for two power levels (i.e., 30 and 5 kW) were designed using an appropriate optimization program. The resulting main features of such expanders were a satisfactory efficiency, a low rotating and peripheral speed, and a comparatively large wheel diameter. These characteristics seem of particular interest for low capacity systems where, with other fluids, turbines tend to be impractically small and fast rotating and where a high level of regeneration becomes more acceptable. In considering for the sake of comparison the thermodynamic performance of many classes of organic fluids, it becomes apparent that the full potential of organic power cycles in view of the variety of future needs has not yet been thoroughly investigated.

Modeling Off-Design and Part-Load Performance of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Dyreby ◽  
Sanford A. Klein ◽  
Gregory F. Nellis ◽  
Douglas T. Reindl
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Supercritical Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Ambient Air ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Brayton Cycle ◽  
Heat Rejection ◽  
Power Cycles ◽  
Part Load ◽  
Dry Cooling ◽  
Supercritical Carbon

Continuing efforts to increase the efficiency of utility-scale electricity generation has resulted in considerable interest in Brayton cycles operating with supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2). One of the advantages of S-CO2 Brayton cycles, compared to the more traditional steam Rankine cycle, is that equal or greater thermal efficiencies can be realized using significantly smaller turbomachinery. Another advantage is that heat rejection is not limited by the saturation temperature of the working fluid, facilitating dry cooling of the cycle (i.e., the use of ambient air as the sole heat rejection medium). While dry cooling is especially advantageous for power generation in arid climates, the reduction in water consumption at any location is of growing interest due to likely tighter environmental regulations being enacted in the future. Daily and seasonal weather variations coupled with electric load variations means the plant will operate away from its design point the majority of the year. Models capable of predicting the off-design and part-load performance of S-CO2 power cycles are necessary for evaluating cycle configurations and turbomachinery designs. This paper presents a flexible modeling methodology capable of predicting the steady state performance of various S-CO2 cycle configurations for both design and off-design ambient conditions, including part-load plant operation. The models assume supercritical CO2 as the working fluid for both a simple recuperated Brayton cycle and a more complex recompression Brayton cycle.

scholarly journals Performance Comparison of Advanced Transcritical Power Cycles with High-Temperature Working Fluids for the Engine Waste Heat Recovery

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 5886
Author(s):  
Xinxing Lin ◽  
Chonghui Chen ◽  
Aofang Yu ◽  
Likun Yin ◽  
Wen Su
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Waste Heat Recovery ◽  
Waste Heat ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Design System ◽  
Working Fluids ◽  
Power Cycles ◽  
System Parameters ◽  
Pressure Cycle

To efficiently recover the waste heat of mobile engine, two advanced transcritical power cycles, namely split cycle and dual pressure cycle, are employed, based on the recuperative cycle. Performances of the two cycles are analyzed and compared through the development of thermodynamic models. Under given gas conditions, seven high-temperature working fluids, namely propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane, neopentane, and cyclopentane, are selected for the two cycles. At the design system parameters, the highest work 48.71 kW, is obtained by the split cycle with butane. For most of fluids, the split cycle has a higher work than the dual pressure cycle. Furthermore, with the increase of turbine inlet pressure, net work of the split cycle goes up firstly and then decreases, while the work of dual pressure cycle increases slowly. For the split cycle, there exists a split ratio to get the maximum network. However, for the dual pressure cycle, the larger the evaporation temperature, the higher the net work. On this basis, system parameters are optimized by genetic algorithm to maximize net work. The results indicate that the highest work 49.96 kW of split cycle is obtained by pentane. For the considered fluids, except cyclopentane, split cycle always has a higher work than dual pressure cycle. Due to the higher net work and fewer system components, split cycle is recommended for the engine waste heat recovery.

Efficient Power Generation From Large 750°C Heat Sources: Application to Coal-Fired and Nuclear Power Stations

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. P. Tilliette ◽  
B. Pierre
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Energy ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Heat Sources ◽  
Turbine Inlet Temperature ◽  
Power Stations ◽  
Efficient Power ◽  
Steam Cycle

Considering the concern about a more efficient, rational use of heat sources, and a greater location flexibility of power plants owing to cooling capability, closed gas cycles can offer new solutions for fossil or nuclear energy. An efficient heat conversion into power is obtained by the combination of a main non-intercooled helium cycle with a flexible, superheated, low-pressure bottoming steam cycle. Emphasis is placed on the matching of the two cycles and, for that, a recuperator bypass arrangement is used. The operation of the main gas turbocompressor does not depend upon the operation of the small steam cycle. Results are presented for a conservative turbine inlet temperature of 750 C. Applications are made for a coal-fired power plant and for a nuclear GT-HTGR. Overall net plant efficiencies of 39 and 46 percent, respectively, are projected.

Start-Up Optimization of a CCGT Power Station Using Model Based Gas Turbine Control

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Nannarone ◽  
Sikke A. Klein
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Optimization Model ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Power Station ◽  
Power Stations ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Steam Cycle

The rapid growth of renewable generation and its intermittent nature has modified the role of combined cycle power stations in the energy industry, and the key feature for the operational excellence is now flexibility. Especially, the capability to start an installation quickly and efficiently after a shutdown period leads to lower operational cost and a higher capacity factor. However, most of existing thermal power stations worldwide are designed for continuous operation, with no special focus on an efficient start-up process. In most current start-up procedures, the gas turbine controls ensure maximum heat flow to the heat recovery steam generator, without feedback from the steam cycle. The steam cycle start-up controls work independently with as main control parameter the limitation of the thermal stresses in the steam turbine rotor. In this paper, a novel start-up procedure of an existing combined cycle power station is presented, and it uses a feedback loop between the steam turbine, the boiler and the gas turbine start-up controls. This feedback loop ensures that the steam turbine can be started up with a significant reduction in stresses. To devise and assess this start-up methodology, a flexible and accurate dynamic model was implemented in the Simulink™ environment. It contains more than 100 component blocks (heat exchangers, valves, meters and sensors, turbines, controls, etc.), and the mathematical component sub-models are based on physical models and experimental correlations. This makes the model generally applicable to other power plant installations. The model was validated against process data related to the three start-up types (cold start, warm start, hot start). On this basis, the optimization model is implemented with feedback loops that control for example the exit temperature of the gas turbine based on the actual steam turbine housing temperature, resulting in a smoother heating up of the steam turbine. The optimization model was used to define the optimal inlet guide vanes position and gas turbine power output curves for the three types of start-up. These curves were used during real power station start-ups, leading to, for cold and warm starts, reductions in the start-up time of respectively 32.5% and 31.8%, and reductions in the fuel consumption of respectively 47.0% and 32.4%. A reduction of the thermal stress in the steam turbines is also achieved, thanks to the new start-up strategy.

Research on Thermal Efficiencies of Various Power Cycles for GFRs and VHTRs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mahdi ◽  
Roman Popov ◽  
Igor Pioro
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Heavy Water ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Supercritical Pressure ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Power Cycles ◽  
Power Cycle ◽  
Combined Cycles ◽  
Gas Turbine Cycle

The vast majority of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) are equipped with water- and heavy-water-cooled reactors. Such NPPs have lower thermal efficiencies (30–36%) compared to those achieved at NPPs equipped with Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors (AGRs) (∼42%) and Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (SFRs) (∼40%), and, especially, compared to those of modern advanced thermal power plants, such as combined cycle with thermal efficiencies up to 62% and supercritical-pressure coal-fired power plants — up to 55%. Therefore, NPPs with water- and heavy-water-cooled reactors are not very competitive with other power plants. Therefore, this deficiency of current water-cooled NPPs should be addressed in the next generation or Generation-IV nuclear-power reactors / NPPs. Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) concept / NPP is currently considered as the most efficient NPP of the next generation. Being a thermal-spectrum reactor, VHTR will use helium as a reactor coolant, which will be heated up to 1000°C. The use of a direct Brayton helium-turbine cycle was considered originally. However, technical challenges associated with the direct helium cycle have resulted in a change of the reference concept to indirect power cycle, which can be also a combined cycle. Along with the VHTR, Gas-cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) concept / NPP is also regarded as one of the most thermally efficient concept for the upcoming generation of NPPs. This concept was also originally thought to be with the direct helium power cycle. However, technical challenges have changed the initial idea of power cycle to a number of options including indirect Brayton cycle with He-N2 mixture, application of SuperCritical (SC)-CO2 cycles or combined cycles. The objective of the current paper is to provide the latest information on new developments in power cycles proposed for these two helium-cooled Generation-IV reactor concepts, which include indirect nitrogen-helium Brayton gas-turbine cycle, supercritical-pressure carbon-dioxide Brayton gas-turbine cycle, and combined cycles. Also, a comparison of basic thermophysical properties of helium with those of other reactor coolants, and with those of nitrogen, nitrogen-helium mixture and SC-CO2 is provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document