Characteristics of Residual Stress Profiles in Hard Turned Versus Ground Surfaces With and Without a White Layer

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Warren ◽  
Y. B. Guo
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Compressive Residual Stress ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Cutting Tool ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
White Layer ◽  
Machining Process ◽  
Tensile Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Stress Profiles

Hard turning and grinding are precision processes in many cases for manufacturing various mechanical products. Product performance is highly dependent on the process induced residual stress. However, the basic differences in residual stress profiles generated by hard turning and grinding with and without the presence of a thermal white layer have not been well understood. This study aims to compare basic characteristics of the residual stress profiles using an extensive residual stress measurement for five surface types: hard turned fresh, hard turned with a white layer, ground fresh, ground with a white layer, and as heat treated. The X-ray diffraction data revealed distinct differences in the residual stress profiles for the five surface types. Hard turning with a sharp cutting tool generates a unique “hook” shaped residual stress profile characterized by compressive residual stress at the surface and maximum compressive residual stress in the subsurface, while “gentle” grinding only generates maximum compressive residual stress at the surface. The depth of compressive residual stress in the subsurface by hard turning is much larger than that by grinding. The high hertz pressure induced by the cutting tool in turning is the determining factor for the differences in residual stress. High tensile residual stress associates with the existence of a turned or a ground white layer. The coupled effects of high hertz pressure and rapid temperature change induced by tool wear play an important role in the resultant tensile residual stress. In addition, residual stress by grinding is more scattered than that by turning. Compared with the deterministic influence of machining process on the magnitudes and profiles of residual stress, the effect of heat treatment is minor.

Characteristics of Residual Stress Profiles in Hard Turned Versus Ground Surfaces With and Without a White Layer

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Warren ◽  
Y. B. Guo
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Residual Stresses ◽  
Compressive Residual Stress ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
White Layer ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Mechanical Products ◽  
Stress Profiles

Hard turning and grinding are competitive processes in many cases for manufacturing various mechanical products. Product performance is highly dependent on the process induced residual stresses. However, there exist some inconsistence regarding the true residual stress profiles generated by hard turning and grinding with and without the presence of a white layer. This study aims to clarify the pressing issues via an extensive residual stress measurement for five surface types: hard turned fresh (HTF), hard turned with a white layer (HTWL), ground fresh (GF), ground with a white layer (GWL), and as heat treated. The x-ray diffraction data revealed distinct differences in the residual stress profiles between the turned and ground surfaces. Specifically, the key findings are: (i) HTF surfaces generate a “hook” shaped residual stress profile characterized by surface compressive residual stress and maximum compressive residual stress in the subsurface, while GF surfaces only generate maximum compressive residual stress at the surface; (ii) HTWL surfaces generate a high tensile stress in the white layer, but has highly compressive residual stress in the deeper subsurface than the HTF surface; (iii) GWL surfaces only shift the residual stress to more tensile but does not affect the basic shape of the profile; (iv) Tensile residual stress in the HTWL surface is higher than that for the GWL one. However, the residual stress for the ground white layer does not become compressive and remains tensile in the subsurface; (v) Elliptical curve fitting is necessary for measuring residual stress for the HTWL surface due to the presence of shear stress induced severe Ψ splitting; (vi) Residual stresses by grinding show more scattering than those by hard turning; and (vii) Machining is the deterministic factor for the resulting residual stress magnitudes and profiles compared with the minor influence of initial residual stress by heat treatment.

Finite element modeling of residual stress profile patterns in hard turning

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. S22-S25
Author(s):  
Y. B. Guo ◽  
S. Anurag
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Finite Element Modeling ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Internal State ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Surface Residual Stress ◽  
Mechanical Coupling ◽  
Element Modeling ◽  
Stress Profiles

Hard turning, i.e., turning hardened steels, may produce the unique “hook” shaped residual stress (RS) profile characterized by surface compressive RS and subsurface maximum compressive RS. However, the formation mechanism of the unique RS profile is not yet known. In this study, a novel hybrid finite element modeling approach based on thermal-mechanical coupling and internal state variable plasticity model has been developed to predict the unique RS profile patterns by hard turning AISI 52100 steel (62 HRc). The most important controlling factor for the unique characteristics of residual stress profiles has been identified. The transition of maximum residual stress at the surface to the subsurface has been recovered by controlling the plowed depth. The predicted characteristics of residual stress profiles favorably agree with the measured ones. In addition, friction coefficient only affects the magnitude of surface residual stress but not the basic shape of residual stress profiles.

Influence of customized cutting edge geometries on the workpiece residual stress in hard turning

2017 ◽  
Vol 232 (12) ◽  
pp. 2132-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos EH Ventura ◽  
Bernd Breidenstein ◽  
Berend Denkena
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Compressive Residual Stress ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Influence Factors ◽  
Contact Length ◽  
Cutting Edge ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Workpiece Surface ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Initiation And Propagation

Depending on the intensity of mechanical and thermal loads during hard turning, compressive and/or tensile residual stress can be obtained. However, only compressive residual stress contributes to avoid crack initiation and propagation and increase fatigue life. In order to induce compressive residual stress in the workpiece surface and subsurface, cutting edge geometry is one of the most important influence factors. Taking this into account, the influence of new customized cutting edge geometries on the parameters of a hook-shaped residual stress profile (typical of a hard turning process) is investigated and possible causes for the encountered phenomena are explained. It was found that edge geometries, which provide an increase in contact length between tool and workpiece, lead to higher compressive residual stress in the subsurface and deeper affected zones.

The Mechanics Basis of Residual Stress Profiles in Proposed API 579 Appendix E

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Dong ◽  
Z. Cao
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Heat Input ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
Measurement Data ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Continuous Change ◽  
Parametric Function ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Stress Profiles ◽  
Pipe Geometry

In this paper, the mechanics basis underlying the parametric through-thickness residual stress profiles proposed for the revised API 579 Appendix E are presented. The proposed residual stress profiles are governed to a large extent by a unified parametric function form valid for a broad spectrum of pipe and vessel welds. The functional relationship is established based on the comprehensive knowledge base developed within a recent major international joint industry project (JIP) under the auspice of Pressure Vessel Research Council (PVRC) and a large amount of residuals stress measurement data from recent literature. One of the most important features associated with the proposed revision is that residual stress profile is uniquely determined by two important sets of governing parameters: (1) parameters relevant to pipe geometry, i.e., r/t and t; (2) a parameter related to welding linear heat input Q (J/mm), referred to as the characteristic heat input Qˆ which has a dimension of J/mm3. As a result, the corresponding through-wall residual stress distribution exhibits a continuous change as a function of r/t, t, and Qˆ, instead of falling into a few discrete and unrelated profiles, as seen in the current Codes and Standards.

A New Finite Element Approach Without Chip Formation to Predict Residual Stress Profile Patterns in Metal Cutting

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Anurag ◽  
Y. B. Guo ◽  
Z. Q. Liu
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Metal Cutting ◽  
Cutting Speed ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Stress Prediction ◽  
Element Approach ◽  
Stress Profiles

Residual stress prediction in hard turning has been recognized as one of the most important and challenging tasks. A hybrid finite element predictive model has been developed with the concept of plowed depth to predict residual stress profiles in hard turning. With the thermo-mechanical work material properties, residual stress has been predicted by simulating the dynamic turning process followed by a quasi-static stress relaxation process. The residual stress profiles were predicted for a series of plowed depths potentially encountered in machining. The predicted residual stress profiles agree with the experimental one in general. A transition of residual stress profile has been recovered at the critical plowed depth. In addition, the effects of cutting speed, friction coefficient and inelastic heat coefficient on residual stress profiles have also been studied and explained.

The Effects of Process-Induced Residual Stress on Rolling Contact Stress of Hard Machined Components

Manufacturing ◽  
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. B. Guo ◽  
Mark E. Barkey ◽  
David W. Yen
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Fatigue Damage ◽  
Compressive Residual Stress ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Stress Pattern ◽  
Rolling Contact ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Significant Difference

Compared with grinding, hard turning is a competitive manufacturing process that in many cases has substantial benefits. The most significant difference between hard turning and grinding is that hard turning may induce a relatively deep compressive residual stress. However, the interactions among the residual stress profile, applied load, and surface material, and their effects on component life in rolling contact are poorly understood. Further, contact stresses and strains are difficult to measure using the current experimental techniques due to the small-scale of the phenomena. A new simulation model of rolling contact has been developed to account for a process-induced residual stress profile. It has shown that distinct residual stress patterns hardly affect neither the magnitudes nor the locations of peak stresses and strains below the surface. However, they have a significant influence on surface deformations. The slope and depth of a compressive residual stress profile are key factors for rolling contact fatigue damage, which was substantiated by the available experimental data. Equivalent plastic strain could be a parameter to characterize the relative fatigue damage. The magnitudes of process-induced residual stress are reduced in rolling contact. The predicted residual stress pattern and magnitude agree with the test data in general. In addition, rolling contact is more sensitive to normal load and residual stress pattern than tangential load.

Residual Stress Profiles of Pipe Girth Weld Using a Stress Decomposition Method

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaguo Teng ◽  
Steve Bate
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Residual Stresses ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
Heuristic Method ◽  
Measurement Data ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Stress Components ◽  
Stress Profiles ◽  
Girth Welds

The application of procedures such as R6 or BS7910 for the structural assessment of defects in pressurised components containing residual stresses requires knowledge of the through-wall residual stress profile. Currently there is much interest in improving the residual stress profiles that are provided in the procedures. In this paper we present an improved analysis of residual stresses of the pipe girth welds by applying the developed heuristic method to one set of extended residual stress measurement data. The through-thickness residual stress is decomposed into three stress components: membrane, bending and self-equilibrating. The heuristic method was applied to the three components separately, so that the residual stress profile was a combination of the three stress components. This form provides not only a clear physical basis for the residual stress profile, but is also convenient for defect assessment where only the membrane and bending stress components are important.

Determination of Residual Stress Profiles of Pipe Girth Weld Using a Unified Parametric Function Form

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaguo Teng ◽  
Steve K. Bate ◽  
David W. Beardsmore
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
Heuristic Method ◽  
Measurement Data ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Function Form ◽  
Parametric Function ◽  
Residual Stress Profile ◽  
Stress Profiles ◽  
Pipe Geometry

In this paper we present an improved analysis of residual stress data of a pipe girth weld by applying the developed heuristic method to one set of high-quality residual stress measurement data. The through-thickness residual stress is expressed as a parametric function form which is a combination of three stress components: membrane, bending and self-equilibrating. This parametric function form provides not only a clear physical basis for the residual stress profile, but is also closely related to two important governing parameters, i.e. the pipe geometry and the welding heat input. The residual stress profiles obtained are also compared with results predicted by the Bayesian method as well as the profiles from the UK R6 procedure and the US API 579 code.

Investigation of White Layers Formed in Conventional and Cryogenic Hard Turning of Steels

Manufacturing ◽  
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zbigniew Zurecki ◽  
Ranajit Ghosh ◽  
John H. Frey
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
White Layer ◽  
Spray Cooling ◽  
Cryogenic Liquid ◽  
Machined Surface ◽  
Machining Speed ◽  
The Impact

Although hard turning of steels has become an accepted industrial practice reducing the extent of grinding, many surface integrity aspects of hard turning require clarification. The striking result of hard turning is the tendency for forming white (non-etching) and dark (overtempered) layers at machined surface. White layers are often associated with residual tensile stresses leading to reduced fatigue strength and poor wear resistance. It has been reported that certain steel compositions, machining conditions, and tools enhance white layers, but no consensus was reached on the nature of white layer and the role of environmental factors. This study examines the impact of cryogenic, liquid nitrogen spray cooling, tool and work materials, as well as machining speed on white layer formation. Results are evaluated using XRD, SEM, EDS, AES, residual stress measurement and microhardness profiling. It is concluded that white layers are a purely thermomechanical phenomenon involving dissolution of low-alloy carbides into austenitic matrix, and catastrophic flow of that 1-phase material resulting in its nano-scale refinement. The depth and extent of the refinement are controlled by cooling, with the cryogenic nitrogen reducing white layer thickness, loss of hardness, and improving residual stress distribution.

Surface Roughness and Cutting Force Components Evaluation in Hard Turning by Differently Shaped Cutting Tools

2016 ◽  
Vol 862 ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Samardžiová
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Cutting Force ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Cutting Tool ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Machining Process ◽  
Tool Geometry ◽  
Machined Surface ◽  
Cutting Force Components ◽  
Force Components

There is a difference in machining by the cutting tool with defined geometry and undefined geometry. That is one of the reasons of implementation of hard turning into the machining process. In current manufacturing processes is hard turning many times used as a fine finish operation. It has many advantages – machining by single point cutting tool, high productivity, flexibility, ability to produce parts with complex shapes at one clamping. Very important is to solve machined surface quality. There is a possibility to use wiper geometry in hard turning process to achieve 3 – 4 times lower surface roughness values. Cutting parameters influence cutting process as well as cutting tool geometry. It is necessary to take into consideration cutting force components as well. Issue of the use of wiper geometry has been still insufficiently researched.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document