Effects of Embedded Vortices on Injectant From Film Cooling Holes With Large Spanwise Spacing and Compound Angle Orientations in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
S. W. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Vortex Core ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Plane Projection ◽  
Flow Vectors ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

Experimental results are presented that describe the effects of embedded, longitudinal vortices on heat transfer and film injectant downstream of a single row of film cooling holes with compound angle orientations. Holes are spaced 7.8 hole diameters apart in the spanwise direction so that information is obtained on the interactions between the vortices and the injectant from a single hole. The compound angle holes are oriented so that their angles with respect to the test surface are 30 deg in a spanwise/normal plane projection, and 35 deg in a streamwise/normal plane projection. A blowing ratio of 0.5 is employed and the ratio of vortex core diameter to hole diameter is 1.6–1.67 just downstream of the injection holes (x/d=10.2). At the same location, vortex circulation magnitudes range from 0.15 m2/s to 0.18 m2/s. The most important conclusion is that local heat transfer and injectant distributions are strongly affected by the longitudinal embedded vortices, including their directions of rotation and their spanwise positions with respect to film injection holes. To obtain information on the latter, clockwise rotating vortices R0–R4 and counterclockwise rotating vortices L0–L4 are placed at different spanwise locations with respect to the central injection hole located on the spanwise centerline. With vortices R0–R4, the greatest disruption to the film is produced by the vortex whose downwash passes over the central hole (R0). With vortices L0–L4, the greatest disruption is produced by the vortices whose cores pass over the central hole (L1 and L2). To minimize such disruptions, vortex centers must pass at least 1.5 vortex core diameters away from an injection hole on the upwash sides of the vortices and 2.9 vortex core diameters away on the downwash sides of the vortices. Differences resulting from vortex rotation are due to secondary flow vectors, especially beneath vortex cores, which are in different directions with respect to the spanwise velocity components of injectant after it exits the holes. When secondary flow vectors near the wall are in the same direction as the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (vortices R0–R4), the film injectant is more readily swept beneath vortex cores and into vortex upwash regions than for the opposite situation in which near-wall secondary flow vectors are opposite to the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (vortices L0–L4). Consequently, higher Stanton numbers are generally present over larger portions of the test surface with vortices R0–R4 than with vortices L0–L4.

Effects of Embedded Vortices on Injectant From Film Cooling Holes With Large Spanwise Spacing and Compound Angle Orientations in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip M. Ligrani ◽  
Stephen W. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Vortex Core ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Plane Projection ◽  
Flow Vectors ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

Experimental results are presented which describe the effects of embedded, longitudinal vortices on heat transfer and film injectant downstream of a single row of film cooling holes with compound angle orientations. Holes are spaced 7.8 hole diameters apart in the spanwise direction so that information is obtained on the interactions between the vortices and the injectant from a single hole. The compound angle holes are oriented so that their angles with respect to the test surface are 30 degrees in a spanwise/normal plane projection, and 35 degrees in a streamwise/normal plane projection. A blowing ratio of 0.5 is employed and the ratio of vortex core diameter to hole diameter is 1.6–1.67 just downstream of the injection holes (x/d=10.2). At the same location, vortex circulation magnitudes range from 0.15 m2/s to 0.18 m2/s. The most important conclusion is that local heat transfer and injectant distributions are strongly affected by the longitudinal embedded vortices, including their directions of rotation and their spanwise positions with respect to film injection holes. To obtain information on the latter, clockwise rotating vortices R0-R4 and counter-clockwise rotating vortices L0-L4 are placed at different spanwise locations with respect to the central injection hole located on the spanwise centerline. With vortices R0-R4, the greatest disruption to the film is produced by the vortex whose downwash passes over the central hole (R0). With vortices L0-L4, the greatest disruption is produced by the vortices whose cores pass over the central hole (L1 and L2). To minimize such disruptions, vortex centers must pass at least 1.5 vortex core diameters away from an injection hole on the upwash sides of the vortices and 2.9 vortex core diameters away on the downwash sides of the vortices. Differences resulting from vortex rotation are due to secondary flow vectors, especially beneath vortex cores, which are in different directions with respect to the spanwise velocity components of injectant after it exits the holes. When secondary flow vectors near the wail are in the same direction as the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (vortices R0-R4), the film injectant is more readily swept beneath vortex cores and into vortex upwash regions than for the opposite situation in which near-wall secondary flow vectors are opposite to the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (vortices L0-L4). Consequently, higher Stanton numbers are generally present over larger portions of the test surface with vortices R0-R4 than with vortices L0-L4.

Interactions Between Embedded Vortices and Injectant From Film Cooling Holes With Compound Angle Orientations in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
S. W. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Hole Diameter ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Normal Plane ◽  
Plane Projection ◽  
Flow Vectors ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

Experimental results are presented that describe the effects of embedded, longitudinal vortices on heat transfer and film injectant downstream of two staggered rows of film cooling holes with compound angle orientations. Holes are oriented so that their angles with respect to the test surface are 30 deg in a spanwise/normal plane projection, and 35 deg in a streamwise/normal plane projection. A blowing ratio of 0.5, nondimensional injection temperature parameter θ of about 1.5, and free-stream velocity of 10 m/s are employed. Injection hole diameter is 0.945 cm to give a ratio of vortex core diameter to hole diameter of 1.6–1.67 just downstream of the injection holes (x/d = 10.2). At the same location, vortex circulation magnitudes range from 0.15 m2/s to 0.18 m2/s. By changing the sign of the angle of attack of the half-delta wings used to generate the vortices, vortices are produced that rotate either clockwise or counterclockwise when viewed looking downstream in spanwise/normal planes. The most important conclusion is that local heat transfer and injectant distributions are strongly affected by the longitudinal embedded vortices, including their directions of rotation and their spanwise positions with respect to film injection holes. Differences resulting from vortex rotation are due to secondary flow vectors, especially beneath vortex cores, which are in different directions with respect to the spanwise velocity components of injectant after it exits the holes. When secondary flow vectors near the wall are in the same direction as the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (clockwise rotating vortices R0–R4), the film injectant is more readily swept beneath vortex cores and into vortex upwash regions than for the opposite situation in which near-wall secondary flow vectors are opposite to the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (counter-clockwise rotating vortices L0–L4). Consequently, higher St/St0 are present over larger portions of the test surface with vortices R0–R4 than with vortices L0–L4. These disruptions to the injectant and heat transfer from the vortices are different from the disruptions that result when similar vortices interact with injectant from holes with simple angle orientations. Surveys of streamwise mean velocity, secondary flow vectors, total pressure, and streamwise mean vorticity are also presented that further substantiate these findings.

Interactions Between Embedded Vortices and Injectant From Film Cooling Holes With Compound Angle Orientations in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
S. W. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Hole Diameter ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Normal Plane ◽  
Plane Projection ◽  
Flow Vectors ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

Experimental results are presented which describe the effects of embedded, longitudinal vortices on heat transfer and film injectant downstream of two staggered rows of film cooling holes with compound angle orientations. Holes are oriented so that their angles with respect to the test surface are 30 degrees in a spanwise/normal plane projection, and 35 degrees in a streamwise/normal plane projection. A blowing ratio of 0.5, non-dimensional injection temperature parameter θ of about 1.5, and freestream velocity of 10 m/s are employed. Injection hole diameter is 0.945 cm to give a ratio of vortex core diameter to hole diameter of 1.6–1.67 just downstream of the injection holes (x/d=10.2). At the same location, vortex circulation magnitudes range from 0.15 m2/s to 0.18 m2/s. By changing the sign of the angle of attack of the half-delta wings used to generate the vortices, vortices are produced which rotate either clockwise or counter-clockwise when viewed looking downstream in spanwise/normal planes. The most important conclusion is that local heat transfer and injectant distributions are strongly affected by the longitudinal embedded vortices, including their directions of rotation and their spanwise positions with respect to film injection holes. Differences resulting from vortex rotation are due to secondary flow vectors, especially beneath vortex cores, which are in different directions with respect to the spanwise velocity components of injectant after it exits the holes. When secondary flow vectors near the wall are in the same direction as the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (clockwise rotating vortices R0-R4), the film injectant is more readily swept beneath vortex cores and into vortex upwash regions than for the opposite situation in which near-wall secondary flow vectors are opposite to the spanwise components of the injectant velocity (counter-clockwise rotating vortices L0-L4). Consequently, higher St/Sto are present over larger portions of the test surface with vortices R0-R4 than with vortices L0-L4. These disruptions to the injectant and heat transfer from the vortices are different from the disruptions which result when similar vortices interact with injectant from holes with simple angle orientations. Surveys of streamwise mean velocity, secondary flow vectors, total pressure, and streamwise mean vorticity are also presented which further substantiate these findings.

Effects of Vortices With Different Circulations on Heat Transfer and Injectant Downstream of a Row of Film-Cooling Holes in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
C. S. Subramanian ◽  
D. W. Craig ◽  
P. Kaisuwan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Vortex Core ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Hole Diameter ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Core Diameter ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Results are presented that illustrate the effects of single embedded longitudinal vortices on heat transfer and injectant downstream of a row of film-cooling holes in a turbulent boundary layer. Attention is focused on the changes resulting as circulation magnitudes of the vortices are varied from 0.0 to 0.15 m2/s. Mean temperature results are presented that show how injectant is distorted and redistributed by vortices, along with heat transfer measurements and mean velocity surveys. Injection hole diameter is 0.952 cm to give a ratio of vortex core diameter to hole diameter of about 1.5–1.6. The free-stream velocity is maintained at 10 m/s, and the blowing ratio is approximately 0.5. Film-cooling holes are oriented 30 deg with respect to the test surface. Stanton numbers are measured on a constant heat flux surface with a nondimensional temperature parameter of about 1.5. Two different situations are studied: one where the middle injection hole is beneath the vortex downwash, and one where the middle injection hole is beneath the vortex upwash. For both cases, vortex centers pass within 2.9–3.4 vortex core diameters of the centerline of the middle injection hole. To quantify the influences of the vortices on the injectant, two new parameters are introduced. S is defined as the ratio of vortex circulation to injection hole diameter times mean injection velocity. S1 is similarly defined except vortex core diameter replaces injection hole diameter. The perturbation to film injectant and local heat transfer is determined by the magnitudes of S and S1. When S is greater than 1–1.5 or when S1 is greater than 0.7–1.0, injectant is swept into the vortex upwash and above the vortex core by secondary flows, and Stanton number data show evidence of injectant beneath the vortex core and downwash near the wall for x/d only up to about 17.5. For larger x/d, local hot spots are present, and the vortices cause local Stanton numbers to be augmented by as much as 25 percent in the film-cooled boundary layers. When S and S1 are less than these values, some injectant remains near the wall beneath the vortex core and downwash where it continues to provide some thermal protection. In some cases, the protection provided by film cooling is augmented because of vortex secondary flows, which cause extra injectant to accumulate near upwash regions.

Effect of Internal Crossflow Velocity on Film Cooling Effectiveness: Part II — Compound Angle Shaped Holes

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. McClintic ◽  
Joshua B. Anderson ◽  
David G. Bogard ◽  
Thomas E. Dyson ◽  
Zachary D. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Crossflow Velocity ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

In gas turbine engines, film cooling holes are commonly fed with an internal crossflow, the magnitude of which has been shown to have a notable effect on film cooling effectiveness. In Part I of this study, as well as in a few previous studies, the magnitude of internal crossflow velocity was shown to have a substantial effect on film cooling effectiveness of axial shaped holes. There is, however, almost no data available in the literature that shows how internal crossflow affects compound angle shaped film cooling holes. In Part II, film cooling effectiveness, heat transfer coefficient augmentation, and discharge coefficients were measured for a single row of compound angle shaped film cooling holes fed by internal crossflow flowing both in-line and counter to the span-wise direction of coolant injection. The crossflow-to-mainstream velocity ratio was varied from 0.2–0.6 and the injection velocity ratio was varied from 0.2–1.7. It was found that increasing the magnitude of the crossflow velocity generally caused degradation of the film cooling effectiveness, especially for in-line crossflow. An analysis of jet characteristic parameters demonstrated the importance of crossflow effects relative to the effect of varying the film cooling injection rate. Heat transfer coefficient augmentation was found to be primarily dependent on injection rate, although for in-line crossflow, increasing crossflow velocity significantly increased augmentation for certain conditions.

Effects of an Embedded Vortex on Injectant From a Single Film-Cooling Hole in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1990 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
W. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Vortex Core ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Thermal Protection ◽  
Hole Diameter ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Stream Velocity ◽  
Vortex Center ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Cooling Hole

Effects of embedded longitudinal vortices on heat transfer in turbulent boundary layers with injection from a single film-cooling hole are described. These results were obtained at a free-stream velocity of 10 m/s, with a film-cooling hole inclined 30 deg to the horizontal and a blowing ratio of about 0.50. The ratio of vortex core diameter to injection hole diameter was 1.58, and the ratio of circulation to injection velocity time hole diameter was about 3.16. Coolant distributions and spatially resolved heat transfer measurements indicate that injection hole centerlines must be at least 2.9–3.4 vortex core diameters away from the vortex center in the lateral direction to avoid significant alterations to wall heat transfer and distributions of film coolant. Under these circumstances, protection from film cooling is evident at least up to 55 hole diameters downstream of injection. When the injection hole is closer to the vortex center, secondary flows convect most injectant into the vortex upwash and thermal protection from film cooling is destroyed for streamwise locations from the injection hole greater than 17.5 hole diameters.

scholarly journals Effects of Compound Angle Injection on Flat-Plate Film Cooling Through a Row of Conical Holes

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Hei Chen ◽  
Di Ai ◽  
Szu-Hsien Lee
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Liquid Crystal Thermography ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Test Pieces ◽  
Circular Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

This paper presents the measured heat transfer and film cooling results over a flat plate as the secondary flow is ejected into the mainstream through a row of conical holes. A transient liquid crystal thermography was employed to derive the film cooling performance and heat transfer distribution over the test flat plate. Each conical injection hole, with a pitch-to-diameter ratio of 3 on the exit plane, had an expanded angle of 8 degrees. The effects of changing the spanwise injection angles and blowing ratios on both film cooling and heat transfer distributions were investigated. Test pieces in this study used different spanwise injection angles of β = 0°, 45°, and 90° but maintained the same inclination angle of γ = 35°. For each test piece, four different blowing ratios of 0.5, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5 were tested at Re = 44,000, Tu = 2.3%, δ1/d = 0.22, p/d = 3, and R = 1.06. A baseline check was also conducted for the flat-plate film cooling through the use of straight circular holes. In addition, a comparison was made between the film cooling results using conical holes with those using straight circular holes. Measured results showed that the laterally averaged heat transfer coefficient increases with the blowing ratio for both straight circular and conical hole configurations. For the simple injection, a conical configuration was found to have better film cooling protection only at higher blowing ratio (M = 1.25 and 1.5). Compound angle injection does not have specific advantage for the film cooling protection in the case of conical configuration.

Louver Slot Cooling and Full-Coverage Film Cooling With a Combination Internal Coolant Supply

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Click ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani ◽  
Maggie Hockensmith ◽  
Joseph Knox ◽  
Chandler Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Test Plate ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Abstract Within the present investigation, a louver slot is employed upstream of an array full coverage film cooling holes. Cooling air is supplied using a combination arrangement, with cross-flow and impingement together. The louver consists of a row of film cooling holes, contained within a specially-designed device which concentrates, and directs the coolant from a slot, so that it then advects as a layer downstream along the test surface. This louver-supplied coolant is then supplemented by coolant which emerges from different rows of downstream film cooling holes. The same coolant supply passage is employed for the louver row of holes, as well as for the film cooling holes, such that different louver and film cooling mass flow rates are set by different hole diameters for the two different types of cooling holes. The results are different from data provided by past investigations, because of the use and arrangement of the louver slot, and because of the unique coolant supply configurations. The experimental results are given for mainstream Reynolds numbers from 107000 to 114000. Full-coverage blowing ratios are constant with streamwise location along the test surface, and range from 3.68 to 5.70. Corresponding louver slot blowing ratios then range from 1.72 to 2.65. Provided are heat transfer coefficient and adiabatic effectiveness distributions, which are measured along the mainstream side of the test plate. Both types of data show less variation with streamwise development location, relative to results obtained without a louver employed, when examined at the same approximate effective blowing ratio, mainstream Reynolds number, cross flow Reynolds number, and impingement jet Reynolds number. When compared at the same effective blowing ratio or the same impingement jet Reynolds number, spanwise-averaged heat transfer coefficients are consistently lower, especially for the downstream regions of the test plate, when the louver is utilized. With the same type of comparisons, the presence of the louver slot results in significantly higher values of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness (spanwise-averaged), particularly at and near the upstream portions of the test plate. With such characteristics, dramatic increases in thermal protection are provided by the presence of the louver slot, the magnitudes of which vary with experimental condition and test surface location.

Film-Cooling From Holes With Compound Angle Orientations: Part 1—Results Downstream of Two Staggered Rows of Holes With 3d Spanwise Spacing

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
J. M. Wigle ◽  
S. Ciriello ◽  
S. M. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Spanwise Direction ◽  
Normal Plane ◽  
Streamwise Location ◽  
Structure Of Flow ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle ◽  
Angle Orientation

Experimental results are presented that describe the development and structure of flow downstream of two staggered rows of film-cooling holes with compound angle orientations. With this configuration, holes are spaced 3d apart in the spanwise direction, inclined at 35 deg with respect to the test surface when projected into the streamwise/normal plane, and inclined at 30 deg with respect to the test surface when projected into the spanwise/normal plane. Results are presented for an injectant to free-stream density ratio near 1.0, and injection blowing ratios from 0.5 to 1.50. Comparisons are made with measurements from two other configurations to determine: (1) the effects of hole angle orientation for constant spanwise hole spacing, and (2) the effects of spanwise hole spacing when the hole angle orientation is maintained constant. Results from the first comparison show that the compound angle injection configuration provides significantly improved film-cooling protection compared to a simple angle configuration for the same spanwise hole spacing, normalized streamwise location x/d, and blowing ratio m, for x/d<60. At x/d>60, spanwise-averaged adiabatic effectiveness data downstream of the two configurations generally cover about the same range. Results from the second comparison show that spanwise-averaged effectiveness values are 25 to 40 percent higher when 3d spanwise hole spacing is employed compared to 3.9d spanwise hole spacing for the same m and x/d, for x/d<40. At x/d>40, differences between the two configurations range from 12 to 30 percent. Results from all configurations studied show that spanwise-averaged iso-energetic Stanton number ratios cover approximately the same range of values and show roughly the same trends, ranging between 1.0 and 1.25. In particular, Stf/St0 values increase with m at each x/d, and show little variation with x/d for each value of m tested.

Effects of Vortices With Different Circulations on Heat Transfer and Injectant Downstream of a Single Film-Cooling Hole in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
C. S. Subramanian ◽  
D. W. Craig ◽  
P. Kaisuwan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Vortex Core ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Hole Diameter ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Injection Hole ◽  
Freestream Velocity ◽  
Cooling Hole

Results are presented which illustrate the effects of single embedded longitudinal vortices on heat transfer and injectant downstream of a single film-cooling hole in a turbulent boundary layer. Attention is focussed on the changes resulting as circulation magnitudes of the vortices are varied from 0.0 to 0.15 m**2/s. Mean temperature results are presented which show how injectant is distorted and redistributed by vortices, along with heat transfer measurements and mean velocity surveys. Injection hole diameter is 0.952 cm to give a ratio of vortex core diameter to hole diameter of about 1.5–1.6. The freestream velocity is maintained at 10 m/s, and the blowing ratio is approximately 0.5. The film-cooling hole is oriented 30 degrees with respect to the test surface. Stanton numbers are measured on a constant heat flux surface with a non-dimensional temperature parameter of about 1.5. Two different situations are studied: one where the injection hole is beneath the vortex downwash, and one where the injection hole is beneath the vortex upwash. For both cases, vortex centers pass well within 2.9 vortex core diameters of the centerline of the injection hole. To quantify the influences of the vortices on the injectant and local heat transfer, the parameter S is used, defined as the ratio of vortex circulation to injection hole diameter times mean injection velocity. When S is greater than 1.0–1.5, injectant is swept into the vortex upwash and above the vortex core by secondary flows, and Stanton number data show evidence of injectant beneath the vortex core and downwash near the wall for x/d only up to 33.6. For larger x/d, local Stanton numbers are augmented by the vortices by as much as 23 percent relative to film-cooled boundary layers with no vortices. When S is less than 1.0–1.5, some injectant remains near the wall beneath the vortex core and downwash where it continues to provide some thermal protection. In some cases, the protection provided by film cooling is augmented because of vortex secondary flows which cause extra injectant to accumulate near vortex upwash regions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document