Some Characteristics of the Vortical Motions in the Outer Region of Turbulent Boundary Layers (Data Bank Contribution)

1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Klewicki ◽  
R. E. Falco ◽  
J. F. Foss
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Signal Amplitude ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Spanwise Vorticity

Time-resolved measurements of the spanwise vorticity component, ωz, are used to investigate the motions in the outer region of turbulent boundary layers. The measurements were taken in very thick zero pressure gradient boundary layers (Rθ = 1010, 2870, 4850) using a four wire probe. As a result of the large boundary layer thickness, at the outer region locations where the measurements were taken the wall-normal and spanwise dimensions of the probe ranged between 0.7 < Δy/η < 1.2 and 2.1 < Δz/η < 3.9, respectively, where η is the local Kolmogorov length. An analysis of vorticity based intermittency is presented near y/δ = 0.6 and 0.85 at each of the Reynolds numbers. The average intermittency is presented as a function of detector threshold level and position in the boundary layer. The spanwise vorticity signals were found to yield average intermittency values at least as large as previous intermittency studies using “surrogate” signals. The average intermittency results do not indicate a region of threshold independence. An analysis of ωz event durations conditioned on the signal amplitude was also performed. The results of this analysis indicate that for decreasing Rθ, regions of single-signed ωz increase in size relative to the boundary layer thickness, but decrease in size when normalized by inner variables.

scholarly journals Effects of spanwise spacing on large-scale secondary flows in rough-wall turbulent boundary layers

2015 ◽  
Vol 774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Vanderwel ◽  
Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Roughness Elements

Large-scale secondary flows can sometimes appear in turbulent boundary layers formed over rough surfaces, creating low- and high-momentum pathways along the surface (Barros & Christensen, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 748, 2014, R1). We investigate experimentally the dependence of these secondary flows on surface/flow conditions by measuring the flows over streamwise strips of roughness with systematically varied spanwise spacing. We find that the large-scale secondary flows are accentuated when the spacing of the roughness elements is roughly proportional to the boundary layer thickness ${\it\delta}$, and do not appear for cases with finer spacing. Cases with coarser spacing also generate ${\it\delta}$-scale secondary flows with tertiary flows in the spaces in between. These results show that the ratio of the spanwise length scale of roughness heterogeneity to the boundary layer thickness is a critical parameter for the occurrence of these secondary motions in turbulent boundary layers over rough walls.

Modeling Dilute Gas-Solid Turbulent Boundary Layers Using Moment Methods

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Dunn ◽  
K. D. Squires
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Gas Phase ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Method Of Moments ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Dispersed Phase ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Carrier Flow

The specific focus of the current effort is on modeling dilute particle-laden turbulent boundary layers in which the gas-phase carrier flow is populated with a second phase of small, dispersed solid particles possessing material densities much larger than that of the carrier flow. A novel approach known as the conditional quadrature method of moments (CQMOM) developed by Yuan and Fox [1], derived from the quadrature-based method of moments (QMOM) developed originally by McGraw [2], is being implemented to model the dispersed particles as an Eulerian phase. Both enabled and disabled inter-particle collision treatments are included in the model for a dispersed phase coupled to the fluid via a drag force acting on the particles. Simulations are conducted with a Reynolds number of 2800 based on the boundary layer thickness at the inlet to the domain. The full 3-D mesh contains 800×128×98 structured cells with overall dimensions in terms of the inlet boundary layer thickness of 80×6 ×4 in the streamwise, spanwise, and wall-normal directions, respectively. The gas-phase carrier flow is computed using Direct Numerical Simulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. The boundary layer develops spatially from a turbulent inflow condition and drives the particulate phase via drag and collisions. Comparisons are made against simulations performed using Lagrangian-based discrete particle simulation (DPS) of the dispersed phase and demonstrate the utility of the Eulerian moment method approach. Both instantaneous and time-averaged quantities are presented.

Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers

2013 ◽  
Vol 715 ◽  
pp. 477-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Jason P. Monty ◽  
Romain Mathis ◽  
Ivan Marusic
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Amplitude Modulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale

AbstractResearch into high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in recent years has brought about a renewed interest in the larger-scale structures. It is now known that these structures emerge more prominently in the outer region not only due to increased Reynolds number (Metzger & Klewicki, Phys. Fluids, vol. 13(3), 2001, pp. 692–701; Hutchins & Marusic, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, pp. 1–28), but also when a boundary layer is exposed to an adverse pressure gradient (Bradshaw, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 29, 1967, pp. 625–645; Lee & Sung, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 639, 2009, pp. 101–131). The latter case has not received as much attention in the literature. As such, this work investigates the modification of the large-scale features of boundary layers subjected to zero, adverse and favourable pressure gradients. It is first shown that the mean velocities, turbulence intensities and turbulence production are significantly different in the outer region across the three cases. Spectral and scale decomposition analyses confirm that the large scales are more energized throughout the entire adverse pressure gradient boundary layer, especially in the outer region. Although more energetic, there is a similar spectral distribution of energy in the wake region, implying the geometrical structure of the outer layer remains universal in all cases. Comparisons are also made of the amplitude modulation of small scales by the large-scale motions for the three pressure gradient cases. The wall-normal location of the zero-crossing of small-scale amplitude modulation is found to increase with increasing pressure gradient, yet this location continues to coincide with the large-scale energetic peak wall-normal location (as has been observed in zero pressure gradient boundary layers). The amplitude modulation effect is found to increase as pressure gradient is increased from favourable to adverse.

Annulus Wall Boundary-Layer Measurements in a Four-Stage Compressor

1986 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Cumpsty
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wall Boundary Layer ◽  
Multistage Compressors ◽  
Full Design

There are few available measurements of the boundary layers in multistage compressors when the repeating-stage condition is reached. These tests were performed in a small four-stage compressor; the flow was essentially incompressible and the Reynolds number based on blade chord was about 5 • 104. Two series of tests were performed; in one series the full design number of blades were installed, in the other series half the blades were removed to reduce the solidity and double the staggered spacing. Initially it was wished to examine the hypothesis proposed by Smith [1] that staggered spacing is a particularly important scaling parameter for boundary layer thickness; the results of these tests and those of Hunter and Cumpsty [2] tend to suggest that it is tip clearance which is most potent in determining boundary-layer integral thicknesses. The integral thicknesses agree quite well with those published by Smith.

A Review of Cascade Data on Secondary Losses in Turbines

1970 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dunham
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Blade Loading ◽  
Axial Turbine ◽  
Wall Boundary Layer ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Turbine Cascades

Theories and experiments on secondary losses in axial turbine cascades without end clearance are reviewed. A formula is given which correlates the effect of blade loading on secondary losses more successfully than hitherto. However, it is also shown that secondary losses increase with upstream wall boundary layer thickness. Only a tentative expression for that effect can be suggested. In order to predict secondary losses reliably more must be known about these wall boundary layers.

Governing Parameters of Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan Maciel ◽  
Tie Wei ◽  
Ayse G. Gungor ◽  
Mark P. Simens
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Inertial Parameter ◽  
Velocity Scale ◽  
Gradient Parameter

We perform a careful nondimensional analysis of the turbulent boundary layer equations in order to bring out, without assuming any self-similar behaviour, a consistent set of nondimensional parameters characterizing the outer region of turbulent boundary layers with arbitrary pressure gradients. These nondimensional parameters are a pressure gradient parameter, a Reynolds number (different from commonly used ones) and an inertial parameter. They are obtained without assuming a priori the outer length and velocity scales. They represent the ratio of the magnitudes of two types of forces in the outer region, using the Reynolds shear stress gradient (apparent turbulent force) as the reference force: inertia to apparent turbulent forces for the inertial parameter, pressure to apparent turbulent forces for the pressure gradient parameter and apparent turbulent to viscous forces for the Reynolds number. We determine under what conditions they retain their meaning, depending on the outer velocity scale that is considered, with the help of seven boundary layer databases. We find the impressive result that if the Zagarola-Smits velocity is used as the outer velocity scale, the streamwise evolution of the three ratios of forces in the outer region can be accurately followed with these non-dimensional parameters in all these flows — not just the order of magnitude of these ratios. This cannot be achieved with three other outer velocity scales commonly used for pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Consequently, the three new nondimensional parameters, when expressed with the Zagarola-Smits velocity, can be used to follow — in a global sense — the streamwise evolution of the stream-wise mean momentum balance in the outer region. This study provides a clear and consistent framework for the analysis of the outer region of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers.

High Freestream Turbulence Effects on Turbulent Boundary Layers

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Thole ◽  
D. G. Bogard
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Power Spectra ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Length Scales ◽  
Turbulent Eddies ◽  
Viscous Shear

High freestream turbulence levels significantly alter the characteristics of turbulent boundary layers. Numerous studies have been conducted with freestreams having turbulence levels of 7 percent or less, but studies using turbulence levels greater than 10 percent have been essentially limited to the effects on wall shear stress and heat transfer. This paper presents measurements of the boundary layer statistics for the interaction between a turbulent boundary layer and a freestream with turbulence levels ranging from 10 to 20 percent. The boundary layer statistics reported in this paper include mean and rms velocities, velocity correlation coefficients, length scales, and power spectra. Although the freestream turbulent eddies penetrate into the boundary layer at high freestream turbulence levels, as shown through spectra and length scale measurements, the mean velocity profile still exhibits a log-linear region. Direct measurements of total shear stress (turbulent shear stress and viscous shear stress) confirm the validity of the log-law at high freestream turbulence levels. Velocity defects in the outer region of the boundary layer were significantly decreased resulting in negative wake parameters. Fluctuating rms velocities were only affected when the freestream turbulence levels exceeded the levels of the boundary layer generated rms velocities. Length scales and power spectra measurements showed large scale turbulent eddies penetrate to within y+ = 15 of the wall.

Wind-Tunnel Screens: Flow Instability and its Effect on Aerofoil Boundary Layers

1964 ◽  
Vol 68 (639) ◽  
pp. 198-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bradshaw
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Flow Instability ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Flat Plates ◽  
Mixing Processes ◽  
Flow Through

Morgan has described a spatial instability in the flow through screens or grids of small open-area ratio. Head and Rechenberg and others have observed large span-wise variations in the thickness and shear stress of nominally two-dimensional boundary layers on flat plates and aerofoils in wind tunnels. It now appears that these spanwise variations are caused by the instability of flow through the screens. The jets of air issuing from the pores of the screen attempt to entrain more air by the usual mixing processes, but can only entrain it from each other, so that groups of jets coalesce in rather random (steady) patterns determined by small irregularities in the weave. The resulting variations in axial velocity are virtually eliminated by the wind tunnel contraction, but variations in flow direction are not so greatly reduced: a theoretical analysis shows that the observed variations of boundary-layer thickness, which often reach ± 10 per cent of the mean, can be produced by directional variations in the working section of the order of ± 1/20 deg, with a spanwise wavelength of the same order as the boundary-layer thickness.

Pressure Gradient Effects on Smooth- and Rough-Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part II: Adverse Pressure Gradient

2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Hyun Shin ◽  
Seung Jin Song
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Roughness Effects ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Velocity Defect

An experimental investigation has been conducted to identify the effects of pressure gradient and surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers. In Part II, smooth- and rough-surface turbulent boundary layers with and without adverse pressure gradient (APG) are presented at a fixed Reynolds number (based on the length of flat plate) of 900,000. Flat-plate boundary layer measurements have been conducted using a single-sensor, hot-wire probe. For smooth surfaces, compared to the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer, the APG boundary layer has a higher mean velocity defect throughout the boundary layer and lower friction coefficient. APG decreases the streamwise normal Reynolds stress for y less than 0.4 times the boundary layer thickness and increases it slightly in the outer region. For rough surfaces, APG reduces the roughness effects of increasing the mean velocity defect and normal Reynolds stress for y less than 23 and 28 times the average roughness height, respectively. Consistently, for the same roughness, APG decreases the integrated streamwise turbulent kinetic energy. APG also decreases the roughness effect on the friction coefficient, roughness Reynolds number, and roughness shift. Compared to the ZPG boundary layers, the roughness effects on integral boundary layer parameters—boundary layer thickness and momentum thickness—are weaker under APG. Thus, contrary to the favorable pressure gradient (FPG) in part I, APG reduces the roughness effects on turbulent boundary layers.

scholarly journals Viscoplastic boundary layers

2017 ◽  
Vol 813 ◽  
pp. 929-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Balmforth ◽  
R. V. Craster ◽  
D. R. Hewitt ◽  
S. Hormozi ◽  
A. Maleki
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Yield Stress ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layer Theory ◽  
Classical Solutions ◽  
Bingham Number ◽  
Boundary Layer Equations ◽  
Two Dimensional Flow

In the limit of a large yield stress, or equivalently at the initiation of motion, viscoplastic flows can develop narrow boundary layers that provide either surfaces of failure between rigid plugs, the lubrication between a plugged flow and a wall or buffers for regions of predominantly plastic deformation. Oldroyd (Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., vol. 43, 1947, pp. 383–395) presented the first theoretical discussion of these viscoplastic boundary layers, offering an asymptotic reduction of the governing equations and a discussion of some model flow problems. However, the complicated nonlinear form of Oldroyd’s boundary-layer equations has evidently precluded further discussion of them. In the current paper, we revisit Oldroyd’s viscoplastic boundary-layer analysis and his canonical examples of a jet-like intrusion and flow past a thin plate. We also consider flow down channels with either sudden expansions or wavy walls. In all these examples, we verify that viscoplastic boundary layers form as envisioned by Oldroyd. For each example, we extract the dependence of the boundary-layer thickness and flow profiles on the dimensionless yield-stress parameter (Bingham number). We find that, while Oldroyd’s boundary-layer theory applies to free viscoplastic shear layers, it does not apply when the boundary layer is adjacent to a wall, as has been observed previously for two-dimensional flow around circular obstructions. Instead, the boundary-layer thickness scales in a different fashion with the Bingham number, as suggested by classical solutions for plane-parallel flows, lubrication theory and, for flow around a plate, by Piau (J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., vol. 102, 2002, pp. 193–218); we rationalize this second scaling and provide an alternative boundary-layer theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document