Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a KRW-Based IGCC Power Plant

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Tsatsaronis ◽  
L. Lin ◽  
T. Tawfik ◽  
D. T. Gallaspy
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Steam Generation ◽  
Cost Information ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Hot Gas ◽  
Advanced Combustion ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
The Cost

In a study supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, several design configurations of Kellogg-Rust-Westinghouse (KRW)-based Integrated Gasification-Combined-Cycle (IGCC) power plants were developed. One of these configurations was analyzed from the exergoeconomic (thermoeconomic) viewpoint. This design configuration uses an air-blown KRW gasifier, hot gas cleanup, and two General Electric MS7001F advanced combustion turbines. Operation at three different gasification temperatures was considered. The detailed exergoeconomic evaluation identified several changes for improving the cost effectiveness of this IGCC design configuration. These changes include the following: decreasing the gasifier operating temperature, enhancing the high-pressure steam generation in the gasification island, improving the efficiency of the steam cycle, and redesigning the entire heat exchanger network. Based on the cost information supplied by the M. W. Kellogg Company, an attempt was made to calculate the economically optimal exergetic efficiency for some of the most important plant components.

Exergetic Comparison of Two KRW-Based IGCC Power Plants

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Tsatsaronis ◽  
T. Tawfik ◽  
L. Lin ◽  
D. T. Gallaspy
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Reference Case ◽  
Performance Improvements ◽  
Hot Gas ◽  
Gas Cooling ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Cold Gas

In studies supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Electric Power Research Institute, several design configurations of Kellogg-Rust-Westinghouse (KRW)-based Integrated Gasification-Combined-Cycle (IGCC) power plants were developed. Two of these configurations are compared here from the exergetic viewpoint. The first design configuration (case 1) uses an air-blown KRW gasifier and hot gas cleanup while the second configuration (reference case) uses an oxygen-blown KRW gasifier and cold gas cleanup. Each case uses two General Electric MS7001F advanced combustion turbines. The exergetic comparison identifies the causes of performance difference between the two cases: differences in the exergy destruction of the gasification system, the gas turbine system, and the gas cooling process, as well as differences in the exergy loss accompanying the solids to disposal stream. The potential for using (a) oxygen-blown versus air-blown-KRW gasifiers, and (b) hot gas versus cold gas cleanup processes was evaluated. The results indicate that, among the available options, an oxygen-blown KRW gasifier using in-bed desulfurization combined with an optimized hot gas cleanup process has the largest potential for providing performance improvements.

The Environmental and Economic Impact of IGCC in China, With Comparison to Alternative Options

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zupan Hu ◽  
Joseph W. Pratt
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Chinese Government ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Government Organizations ◽  
Result Show ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Business As Usual

The goal of this study is to evaluate the economic and environmental performance of power plants based on integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology, and to compare it with currently relevant renewable and nuclear power generation options in China, until the year 2020. First, electricity demand is predicted, based on up-to-date policies made by Chinese government organizations. From this, a business as usual (BAU) study, in which coal-fired power plant technology is assumed to be unchanged from 2010 to 2020, is carried out as a reference. Different scenarios of IGCC technology adoption are then studied using a newly developed model, and the result show, for example, that there could be 10.05 billion tons of CO2 emission avoided from 2010 to 2020 if 50% of newly built coal-fired plants are based on IGCC technology with CO2 capture. When compared with other options, the cost of avoided CO2 emissions in this scenario is more expensive than hydroelectric, nuclear, and wind, but cheaper than solar (thermal and photovoltaic). The results also show that IGCC, although more expensive, could still be important in China’s coal-dominated electricity industry.

Exergoeconomic analysis of renewable multi-generation system

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Vontas Alfenny Nahan ◽  
Audrius Bagdanavicius ◽  
Andrew McMullan
Keyword(s):  
Capital Investment ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Generation System ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Heating And Cooling ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Exergoeconomic Analysis ◽  
Main Components ◽  
The Cost

In this study a new multi-generation system which generates power (electricity), thermal energy (heating and cooling) and ash for agricultural needs has been developed and analysed. The system consists of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) and an absorption chiller system. The system generates about 3.4 MW electricity, 4.9 MW of heat, 88 kW of cooling and 90 kg/h of ash. The multi-generation system has been modelled using Cycle Tempo and EES. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of this system had been conducted and exergy costs have been calculated. The exergoeconomic study shows that gasifier, combustor, and Heat Recovery Steam Generator are the main components where the total cost rates are the highest. Exergoeconomic variables such as relative cost difference (r) and exergoeconomic factor (f) have also been calculated. Exergoeconomic factor of evaporator, combustor and condenser are 1.3%, 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively, which is considered very low, indicates that the capital cost rates are much lower than the exergy destruction cost rates. It implies that the improvement of these components could be achieved by increasing the capital investment. The exergy cost of electricity produced in the gas turbine and steam turbine is 0.1050 £/kWh and 0.1627 £/kWh, respectively. The cost of ash is 0.0031 £/kg. In some Asian countries, such as Indonesia, ash could be used as fertilizer for agriculture. Heat exergy cost is 0.0619 £/kWh for gasifier and 0.3972 £/kWh for condenser in the BIGCC system. In the AC system, the exergy cost of the heat in the condenser and absorber is about 0.2956 £/kWh and 0.5636 £/kWh, respectively. The exergy cost of cooling in the AC system is 0.4706 £/kWh. This study shows that exergoeconomic analysis is powerful tool for assessing the costs of products.

scholarly journals Development of Ceramic Composite Hot-Gas Filters

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roddie R. Judkins ◽  
David P. Stinton ◽  
Robert G. Smith ◽  
Edward M. Fischer ◽  
Joseph H. Eaton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Laboratory ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Ceramic Fiber ◽  
Fluidized Bed Combustion ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Hot Gas ◽  
The Status ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustion

A novel type of hot-gas filter based on a ceramic fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix was developed and extended to full-size, 60-mm OD by 1.5-meter-long, candle filters. A commercially viable process for producing the filters was developed, and the filters are undergoing testing and demonstration throughout the world for applications in pressurized fluidized-bed combustion (PFBC) and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants. Development activities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and at the 3M Company, and testing at the Westinghouse Science and Technology Center (STC) are presented. Demonstration tests at the Tidd PFBC are in progress. Issues identified during the testing and demonstration phases of the development are discussed. Resolution of the issues identified during testing and the status of commercialization of the filters are described.

Design and Test of a 73-MW Water Cooled Gas Turbine

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Caruvana ◽  
R. S. Rose ◽  
E. D. Alderson ◽  
G. A. Cincotta
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Water Cooling ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Hot Gas ◽  
Critical Technology ◽  
Component Development ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Future Plans

This paper presents a preliminary design of a water-cooled gas turbine capable of operating on coal derived fuels and producing 73 MW when burning low Btu coal gas. Particular emphasis is placed on the critical technology issues of combustion and heat transfer at 2600 deg firing temperature. The recent technology developments; i.e., materials developments, composite construction, water cooling, fuels cleanup, etc., which now make this advanced concept possible are discussed. Detailed descriptions of the hot gas path components, the staged sectoral combustor, the water cooled nozzles and buckets, are described showing the implementation of these recent developments. The component development test program which is underway, is described and where testing results are available, design confirmation is demonstrated. Future plans for the construction of a full scale prototype machine and for design verification testing are presented. An analytical evaluation is included which demonstrates the advantages of the water-cooled gas turbine in an integrated gasification combined cycle.

scholarly journals Design and Modeling of a Carbon Capturing Membrane for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hashmi SAM ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Igcc Power Plant

The main idea of this research paper is to provide an innovative way of capturing carbon dioxide emissions from a coal powered power plant. This research paper discusses the design and modeling of a carbon capturing membrane which is being used in an IGCC power plant to capture carbon dioxide from its exhaust gases. The modeling and design of the membrane is done using CFD software namely Ansys workbench. The design and modeling is done using two simulations, one describes the design and structure and the second one demonstrates the working mechanism of the membrane. This paper also briefly discusses IGCC which is environmentally benign compared to traditional pulverized coal-fired power plants, and economically feasible compared to the Natural Gas Combine Cycle (NGCC). IGCC power plant is more diverse and offers flexibility in fuel utility. This paper also incorporates a PFD of integrated gasification power plant with the carbon capturing membrane unit integrated in it. Index Terms: Integrated gasification combined cycle power plant, Carbon capture and storage, Gas permeating membrane, CFD based design of gas permeating membrane.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document