Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gary Wang ◽  
S. Shan
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Model Approximation ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Computation Efficiency ◽  
Modern Engineering

Computation-intensive design problems are becoming increasingly common in manufacturing industries. The computation burden is often caused by expensive analysis and simulation processes in order to reach a comparable level of accuracy as physical testing data. To address such a challenge, approximation or metamodeling techniques are often used. Metamodeling techniques have been developed from many different disciplines including statistics, mathematics, computer science, and various engineering disciplines. These metamodels are initially developed as “surrogates” of the expensive simulation process in order to improve the overall computation efficiency. They are then found to be a valuable tool to support a wide scope of activities in modern engineering design, especially design optimization. This work reviews the state-of-the-art metamodel-based techniques from a practitioner’s perspective according to the role of metamodeling in supporting design optimization, including model approximation, design space exploration, problem formulation, and solving various types of optimization problems. Challenges and future development of metamodeling in support of engineering design is also analyzed and discussed.

Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gary Wang ◽  
S. Shan
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Model Approximation ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Computation Efficiency ◽  
Modern Engineering

Computation-intensive design problems are becoming increasingly common in manufacturing industries. The computation burden is often caused by expensive analysis and simulation processes in order to reach a comparable level of accuracy as physical testing data. To address such a challenge, approximation or metamodeling techniques are often used. Metamodeling techniques have been developed from many different disciplines including statistics, mathematics, computer science, and various engineering disciplines. These metamodels are initially developed as “surrogates” of the expensive simulation process in order to improve the overall computation efficiency. They are then found to be a valuable tool to support a wide scope of activities in modern engineering design, especially design optimization. This work reviews the state-of-the-art metamodel-based techniques from a practitioner’s perspective according to the role of metamodeling in supporting design optimization, including model approximation, design space exploration, problem formulation, and solving various types of optimization problems. Challenges and future development of metamodeling in support of engineering design is also analyzed and discussed.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Problem Formulation and Ideation Skills Learned Throughout an Engineering Design Course

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Dinar ◽  
Yong-Seok Park ◽  
Jami J. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Engineering Product ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Final Project ◽  
Design Projects ◽  
Design Skills ◽  
Long Course

Conventional syllabi of engineering design courses either do not pay enough attention to conceptual design skills, or they lack an objective assessment of those skills to show students’ progress. During a semester-long course of advanced engineering product design, we assigned three major design projects to twenty five students. For each project we asked them to formulate the problems in the Problem Formulator web-based testbed. In addition, we collected sketches for all three design problems, feasibility analyses for the last two, and a working prototype for the final project. We report the students’ problem formulation and ideation in terms of a set of nine problem formulation characteristics and ASU’s ideation effectiveness metrics respectively. We discuss the limitations that the choice of the design problems caused, and how the progress of a class of students during a semester-long design course resulted in a convergence in sets of metrics that we have defined to characterize problem formulation and ideation. We also review the results of students of a similar course which we reported last year in order to find common trends.

A rank-based constraint handling technique for engineering design optimization problems solved by genetic algorithms

2017 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael de Paula Garcia ◽  
Beatriz Souza Leite Pires de Lima ◽  
Afonso Celso de Castro Lemonge ◽  
Breno Pinheiro Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Engineering Design Optimization ◽  
Handling Technique

scholarly journals SRIFA: Stochastic Ranking with Improved-Firefly-Algorithm for Constrained Optimization Engineering Design Problems

Mathematics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh Balande ◽  
Deepti Shrimankar
Keyword(s):  
Constrained Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Real World ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Firefly Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Improved Firefly Algorithm ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
And Performance

Firefly-Algorithm (FA) is an eminent nature-inspired swarm-based technique for solving numerous real world global optimization problems. This paper presents an overview of the constraint handling techniques. It also includes a hybrid algorithm, namely the Stochastic Ranking with Improved Firefly Algorithm (SRIFA) for solving constrained real-world engineering optimization problems. The stochastic ranking approach is broadly used to maintain balance between penalty and fitness functions. FA is extensively used due to its faster convergence than other metaheuristic algorithms. The basic FA is modified by incorporating opposite-based learning and random-scale factor to improve the diversity and performance. Furthermore, SRIFA uses feasibility based rules to maintain balance between penalty and objective functions. SRIFA is experimented to optimize 24 CEC 2006 standard functions and five well-known engineering constrained-optimization design problems from the literature to evaluate and analyze the effectiveness of SRIFA. It can be seen that the overall computational results of SRIFA are better than those of the basic FA. Statistical outcomes of the SRIFA are significantly superior compared to the other evolutionary algorithms and engineering design problems in its performance, quality and efficiency.

On combinatorial design spaces for the configuration design of product families

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZAHED SIDDIQUE ◽  
DAVID W. ROSEN
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Product Family ◽  
Product Variety ◽  
Combinatorial Design ◽  
Configuration Design ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
Space Modeling

For typical optimization problems, the design space of interest is well defined: It is a subset of Rn, where n is the number of (continuous) variables. Constraints are often introduced to eliminate infeasible regions of this space from consideration. Many engineering design problems can be formulated as search in such a design space. For configuration design problems, however, the design space is much more difficult to define precisely, particularly when constraints are present. Configuration design spaces are discrete and combinatorial in nature, but not necessarily purely combinatorial, as certain combinations represent infeasible designs. One of our primary design objectives is to drastically reduce the effort to explore large combinatorial design spaces. We believe it is imperative to develop methods for mathematically defining design spaces for configuration design. The purpose of this paper is to outline our approach to defining configuration design spaces for engineering design, with an emphasis on the mathematics of the spaces and their combinations into larger spaces that more completely capture design requirements. Specifically, we introduce design spaces that model physical connectivity, functionality, and assemblability considerations for a representative product family, a class of coffeemakers. Then, we show how these spaces can be combined into a “common” product variety design space. We demonstrate how constraints can be defined and applied to these spaces so that feasible design regions can be directly modeled. Additionally, we explore the topological and combinatorial properties of these spaces. The application of this design space modeling methodology is illustrated using the coffeemaker product family.

Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with Dynamic Population and its Application to Constrained Engineering Design Optimization

2012 ◽  
Vol 538-541 ◽  
pp. 3074-3078
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
Cai Hong Mu ◽  
Wei Dong Kou ◽  
Jing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Particle Swarm Optimization ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Swarm Optimization ◽  
Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design Optimization ◽  
Dynamic Population

This paper presents a variant of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) that we call the adaptive particle swarm optimization with dynamic population (DP-APSO), which adopts a novel dynamic population (DP) strategy whereby the population size of swarm can vary with the evolutionary process. The DP strategy enables the population size to increase when the swarm converges and decrease when the swarm disperses. Experiments were conducted on two well-studied constrained engineering design optimization problems. The results demonstrate better performance of the DP-APSO in solving these engineering design optimization problems when compared with two other evolutionary computation algorithms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document