Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers in Shallow Open Channel Flow

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Tachie ◽  
D. J. Bergstrom ◽  
R. Balachandar
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Shallow Flows ◽  
Defect Profile ◽  
Flow Reynolds Number

An experimental study was undertaken to investigate the effects of roughness on the structure of turbulent boundary layers in open channels. The study was carried out using a laser Doppler anemometer in shallow flows for three different types of rough surface, as well as a hydraulically smooth surface. The flow Reynolds number based on the boundary layer momentum thickness ranged from 1400 to 4000. The boundary layer thickness was comparable with the depth of flow and the turbulence intensity in the channel flow varied from 2 to 4 percent. The defect profile was correlated using an approach which allowed both the skin friction and wake strength to vary. The wake parameter was observed to vary significantly with the type of surface roughness in contradiction to the “wall similarity” hypothesis. Wall roughness also led to higher turbulence levels in the outer region of the boundary layer. The profound effect of surface roughness on the outer region as well as the effect of channel turbulence on the main flow indicates a strong interaction, which must be accounted for in turbulence models. [S0098-2202(00)00803-8]

Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers

2013 ◽  
Vol 715 ◽  
pp. 477-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Jason P. Monty ◽  
Romain Mathis ◽  
Ivan Marusic
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Amplitude Modulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale

AbstractResearch into high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in recent years has brought about a renewed interest in the larger-scale structures. It is now known that these structures emerge more prominently in the outer region not only due to increased Reynolds number (Metzger & Klewicki, Phys. Fluids, vol. 13(3), 2001, pp. 692–701; Hutchins & Marusic, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, pp. 1–28), but also when a boundary layer is exposed to an adverse pressure gradient (Bradshaw, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 29, 1967, pp. 625–645; Lee & Sung, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 639, 2009, pp. 101–131). The latter case has not received as much attention in the literature. As such, this work investigates the modification of the large-scale features of boundary layers subjected to zero, adverse and favourable pressure gradients. It is first shown that the mean velocities, turbulence intensities and turbulence production are significantly different in the outer region across the three cases. Spectral and scale decomposition analyses confirm that the large scales are more energized throughout the entire adverse pressure gradient boundary layer, especially in the outer region. Although more energetic, there is a similar spectral distribution of energy in the wake region, implying the geometrical structure of the outer layer remains universal in all cases. Comparisons are also made of the amplitude modulation of small scales by the large-scale motions for the three pressure gradient cases. The wall-normal location of the zero-crossing of small-scale amplitude modulation is found to increase with increasing pressure gradient, yet this location continues to coincide with the large-scale energetic peak wall-normal location (as has been observed in zero pressure gradient boundary layers). The amplitude modulation effect is found to increase as pressure gradient is increased from favourable to adverse.

Some Characteristics of the Vortical Motions in the Outer Region of Turbulent Boundary Layers (Data Bank Contribution)

1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Klewicki ◽  
R. E. Falco ◽  
J. F. Foss
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Signal Amplitude ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Spanwise Vorticity

Time-resolved measurements of the spanwise vorticity component, ωz, are used to investigate the motions in the outer region of turbulent boundary layers. The measurements were taken in very thick zero pressure gradient boundary layers (Rθ = 1010, 2870, 4850) using a four wire probe. As a result of the large boundary layer thickness, at the outer region locations where the measurements were taken the wall-normal and spanwise dimensions of the probe ranged between 0.7 < Δy/η < 1.2 and 2.1 < Δz/η < 3.9, respectively, where η is the local Kolmogorov length. An analysis of vorticity based intermittency is presented near y/δ = 0.6 and 0.85 at each of the Reynolds numbers. The average intermittency is presented as a function of detector threshold level and position in the boundary layer. The spanwise vorticity signals were found to yield average intermittency values at least as large as previous intermittency studies using “surrogate” signals. The average intermittency results do not indicate a region of threshold independence. An analysis of ωz event durations conditioned on the signal amplitude was also performed. The results of this analysis indicate that for decreasing Rθ, regions of single-signed ωz increase in size relative to the boundary layer thickness, but decrease in size when normalized by inner variables.

Governing Parameters of Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan Maciel ◽  
Tie Wei ◽  
Ayse G. Gungor ◽  
Mark P. Simens
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Inertial Parameter ◽  
Velocity Scale ◽  
Gradient Parameter

We perform a careful nondimensional analysis of the turbulent boundary layer equations in order to bring out, without assuming any self-similar behaviour, a consistent set of nondimensional parameters characterizing the outer region of turbulent boundary layers with arbitrary pressure gradients. These nondimensional parameters are a pressure gradient parameter, a Reynolds number (different from commonly used ones) and an inertial parameter. They are obtained without assuming a priori the outer length and velocity scales. They represent the ratio of the magnitudes of two types of forces in the outer region, using the Reynolds shear stress gradient (apparent turbulent force) as the reference force: inertia to apparent turbulent forces for the inertial parameter, pressure to apparent turbulent forces for the pressure gradient parameter and apparent turbulent to viscous forces for the Reynolds number. We determine under what conditions they retain their meaning, depending on the outer velocity scale that is considered, with the help of seven boundary layer databases. We find the impressive result that if the Zagarola-Smits velocity is used as the outer velocity scale, the streamwise evolution of the three ratios of forces in the outer region can be accurately followed with these non-dimensional parameters in all these flows — not just the order of magnitude of these ratios. This cannot be achieved with three other outer velocity scales commonly used for pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Consequently, the three new nondimensional parameters, when expressed with the Zagarola-Smits velocity, can be used to follow — in a global sense — the streamwise evolution of the stream-wise mean momentum balance in the outer region. This study provides a clear and consistent framework for the analysis of the outer region of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers.

High Freestream Turbulence Effects on Turbulent Boundary Layers

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Thole ◽  
D. G. Bogard
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Power Spectra ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Length Scales ◽  
Turbulent Eddies ◽  
Viscous Shear

High freestream turbulence levels significantly alter the characteristics of turbulent boundary layers. Numerous studies have been conducted with freestreams having turbulence levels of 7 percent or less, but studies using turbulence levels greater than 10 percent have been essentially limited to the effects on wall shear stress and heat transfer. This paper presents measurements of the boundary layer statistics for the interaction between a turbulent boundary layer and a freestream with turbulence levels ranging from 10 to 20 percent. The boundary layer statistics reported in this paper include mean and rms velocities, velocity correlation coefficients, length scales, and power spectra. Although the freestream turbulent eddies penetrate into the boundary layer at high freestream turbulence levels, as shown through spectra and length scale measurements, the mean velocity profile still exhibits a log-linear region. Direct measurements of total shear stress (turbulent shear stress and viscous shear stress) confirm the validity of the log-law at high freestream turbulence levels. Velocity defects in the outer region of the boundary layer were significantly decreased resulting in negative wake parameters. Fluctuating rms velocities were only affected when the freestream turbulence levels exceeded the levels of the boundary layer generated rms velocities. Length scales and power spectra measurements showed large scale turbulent eddies penetrate to within y+ = 15 of the wall.

scholarly journals Direct numerical simulation of premixed flame boundary layer flashback in turbulent channel flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 709 ◽  
pp. 516-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gruber ◽  
J. H. Chen ◽  
D. Valiev ◽  
C. K. Law
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Hydrodynamic Instability ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Premixed Flame ◽  
Flame Sheet ◽  
Near Wall

AbstractDirect numerical simulations are performed to investigate the transient upstream propagation (flashback) of premixed hydrogen–air flames in the boundary layer of a fully developed turbulent channel flow. Results show that the well-known near-wall velocity fluctuations pattern found in turbulent boundary layers triggers wrinkling of the initially flat flame sheet as it starts propagating against the main flow direction, and that the structure of the characteristic streaks of the turbulent boundary layer ultimately has an important impact on the resulting flame shape and on its propagation mechanism. It is observed that the leading edges of the upstream-propagating premixed flame are always located in the near-wall region of the channel and assume the shape of several smooth, curved bulges propagating upstream side by side in the spanwise direction and convex towards the reactant side of the flame. These leading-edge flame bulges are separated by thin regions of spiky flame cusps pointing towards the product side at the trailing edges of the flame. Analysis of the instantaneous velocity fields clearly reveals the existence, on the reactant side of the flame sheet, of backflow pockets that extend well above the wall-quenching distance. There is a strong correspondence between each of the backflow pockets and a leading edge convex flame bulge. Likewise, high-speed streaks of fast flowing fluid are found to be always colocated with the spiky flame cusps pointing towards the product side of the flame. It is suggested that the origin of the formation of the backflow pockets, along with the subsequent mutual feedback mechanism, is due to the interaction of the approaching streaky turbulent flow pattern with the Darrieus–Landau hydrodynamic instability and pressure fluctuations triggered by the flame sheet. Moreover, the presence of the backflow pockets, coupled with the associated hydrodynamic instability and pressure–flow field interaction, greatly facilitate flame propagation in turbulent boundary layers and ultimately results in high flashback velocities that increase proportionately with pressure.

scholarly journals Computation of unsteady turbulent boundary layers with flow reversal, and evaluation of two separate turbulence models

1982 ◽  
Vol 380 (1779) ◽  
pp. 291-304 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Laminar Flows ◽  
Flow Reversal ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Boundary Layer Method ◽  
Stress Term

In this paper we extend the unsteady laminar boundary-layer method of Cebeci to turbulent boundary layers with flow reversal. Using the algebraic eddy-viscosity formulation of Cebeci and Smith, we consider several test cases to investigate the proposition that unsteady turbulent boundary layers also remain free of singularities. Since the accuracy of turbulent flow calculations also depends on the closure assumption for the Reynolds shear-stress term, we also perform calculations by using the turbulence model of Bradshaw, Ferriss and Atwell; we solve th e governing equations for both models by using the same numerical scheme and compare their predictions, restricting the comparisons to cases in which wall shear is positive. The study reveals that, as in laminar flows, the unsteady turbulent boundary layers seem to be free from singularities but there is a clear indication of rapid thickening of the boundary layer with increasing flow reversal. The study also reveals that the predictions of both turbulence models are the same for all practical purposes.

The Effect of Surface Roughness and Favorable Pressure Gradient on Turbulent Boundary Layers

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Hyun Shin ◽  
Seung Jin Song
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Layer Growth ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient

Rough wall turbulent boundary layers subjected to pressure gradient have engineering interest for many fluid machinery applications. A number of investigations have been made to understand surface roughness and pressure gradient effects on turbulent boundary layer characteristics, but separately. In this paper, turbulent boundary layers over a flat plate with surface roughness and favorable pressure gradient (FPG) are experimentally investigated. Boundary layers in different streamwise locations were measured using boundary layer type hot-wire anemometry. Rough wall zero pressure gradient (ZPG) turbulent boundary layers were also measured to compare the result from the investigation. The surface roughness was applied by attaching sandpapers on the flat plate. The magnitude of surface roughness is representative of land-based gas turbine compressor blade. Pressure gradient was adjusted using movable endwall of the test section. Results from the measurement show characteristics of the turbulent boundary layer growth affected by both surface roughness and favorable pressure gradient.

The Departure from Equilibrium of Turbulent Boundary Layers

1968 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Pressure Distributions ◽  
Momentum Integral ◽  
State Examination

SummaryRecently two authors, Nash and Goldberg, have suggested, intuitively, that the rate at which the shear stress distribution in an incompressible, two-dimensional, turbulent boundary layer would return to its equilibrium value is directly proportional to the extent of the departure from the equilibrium state. Examination of the behaviour of the integral properties of the boundary layer supports this hypothesis. In the present paper a relationship similar to the suggestion of Nash and Goldberg is derived from the local balance of the kinetic energy of the turbulence. Coupling this simple derived relationship to the boundary layer momentum and moment-of-momentum integral equations results in quite accurate predictions of the behaviour of non-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers in arbitrary adverse (given) pressure distributions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document