scholarly journals Building a Global, Pediatric Vascular Access Registry: A Scoping Review of Trial Outcomes and Quality Indicators to Inform Evidence‐Based Practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Schults ◽  
Claire M. Rickard ◽  
Tricia Kleidon ◽  
Rebecca Hughes ◽  
Fiona Macfarlane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Trial Outcomes

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Video Modeling for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soonhwa Seok ◽  
Boaventura DaCosta ◽  
Mikayla McHenry-Powell ◽  
Linda Heitzman-Powell ◽  
Katrina Ostmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Video Modeling ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Emotional And Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
K 12 ◽  
Students With Ebd

This systematic review examined eight studies showing that video modeling (VM) can have a positive and significant effect for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). Building upon meta-analyses that sought evidence of video-based interventions decreasing problem behaviors of students with EBD in K-12 education, the review examined the standards of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) for evidence-based practice as well as additional quality indicators, neglected quality indicators, strategies combined with VM, the impact of the independent variables on the dependent variables, and common recommendations offered for future research. Findings revealed that the eight studies met the CEC standards for evidence-based practices as well as other quality indicators. For instance, all studies reported content and setting, participants, intervention agents, description of practice, as well as interobserver agreement and experimental control. According to the findings, fidelity index and effect size were the two most neglected quality indicators. Furthermore, instructions, reinforcement system, and feedback or discussion were the most common strategies used. Finally, generalizability—across settings, populations, treatment agents, target behaviors in the real world, and subject matter—was the most common recommendation for future research. While further investigation is warranted, these findings suggest that VM is an effective evidence-based practice for students with EBD when the CEC standards are met.

scholarly journals Evidence-based practice implementation in healthcare in China: a living scoping review

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 100355
Author(s):  
Junqiang Zhao ◽  
Wenhui Bai ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Yujie Su ◽  
Jinfang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Practice Implementation

scholarly journals Nurse-Led Interventions for Hypertension: A Scoping Review With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori A. Spies ◽  
Susan Gerding Bader ◽  
Jackline G. Opollo ◽  
Jennifer Gray
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based

scholarly journals 73 Methods for teaching evidence-based practice: a scoping review

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Seneca Terkelsen ◽  
Anne-Marie Fiala Carlsen ◽  
Camilla Marie Larsen ◽  
Poul Bruun ◽  
Hanne Kaae Kristensen
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based

scholarly journals Methods for teaching evidence-based practice: a scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Marie Larsen ◽  
Anne Seneca Terkelsen ◽  
Anne-Marie Fiala Carlsen ◽  
Hanne Kaae Kristensen
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based

The Concrete–Representational–Abstract Approach for Students With Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Practice Synthesis

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Rajiv Satsangi ◽  
Jiyoon Park
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Instructional Framework ◽  
Abstract Approach ◽  
Best Evidence Synthesis

As researchers and practitioners have increasingly become interested in what practices are evidence based and for whom in education, different sets of quality indicators and evidence-based practice standards have emerged in the field of special education. Practices are commonly suggested as evidence based, even without a best evidence synthesis on the existing research, such as the case with the concrete–representational–abstract (CRA) instructional framework to support students with disabilities in mathematics. This study sought to support the classification of the CRA instructional framework as an evidence-based approach for students with learning disabilities by applying quality indicators and standards of evidence-based practice by Cook et al. (2014). Based on the application of the indicators and standards, the CRA instructional framework was determined to be an evidence-based practice for students with learning disabilities who struggle in mathematics relative to computational problems, such as addition, subtraction, and multiplication, largely with regrouping.

A Scoping Review of Methods Used to Assess Medication Adherence in Patients with Chronic Conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinelopi Konstantinou ◽  
Orestis Kasinopoulos ◽  
Christiana Karashiali ◽  
Geοrgios Georgiou ◽  
Andreas Panayides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Electronic Monitoring ◽  
Intervention Development ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Gold Standard Method

Abstract Background Medication nonadherence of patients with chronic conditions is a complex phenomenon contributing to increased economic burden and decreased quality of life. Intervention development relies on accurately assessing adherence but no “gold standard” method currently exists. Purpose The present scoping review aimed to: (a) review and describe current methods of assessing medication adherence (MA) in patients with chronic conditions with the highest nonadherence rates (asthma, cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, HIV/AIDS, hypertension), (b) outline and compare the evidence on the quality indicators between assessment methods (e.g., sensitivity), and (c) provide evidence-based recommendations. Methods PubMed, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were screened, resulting in 62,592 studies of which 71 met criteria and were included. Results Twenty-seven self-report and 10 nonself-report measures were identified. The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) was found to be the most accurate self-report, whereas electronic monitoring devices such as Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) corresponded to the most accurate nonself-report. Higher MA rates were reported when assessed using self-reports compared to nonself-reports, except from pill counts. Conclusions Professionals are advised to use a combination of self-report (like MARS-5) and nonself-report measures (like MEMS) as these were found to be the most accurate and reliable measures. This is the first review examining self and nonself-report methods for MA, across chronic conditions with the highest nonadherence rates and provides evidence-based recommendations. It highlights that MA assessment methods are understudied in certain conditions, like epilepsy. Before selecting a MA measure, professionals are advised to inspect its quality indicators. Feasibility of measures should be explored in future studies as there is presently a lack of evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document