Canine cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle biomechanics associated with extra-articular stabilization predicted using a computer model

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Brown ◽  
Gina E. Bertocci ◽  
Denis J. Marcellin-Little
Keyword(s):  
Computer Model ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament

DEVELOPMENT OF A CANINE STIFLE COMPUTER MODEL TO EVALUATE CRANIAL CRUCIATE LIGAMENT DEFICIENCY

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 1350043 ◽  
Author(s):  
NATHAN P. BROWN ◽  
GINA E. BERTOCCI ◽  
DENIS J. MARCELLIN-LITTLE
Keyword(s):  
Computer Model ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Model Verification ◽  
Tibial Rotation ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Load Bearing ◽  
Tibial Translation

The objective of this study was to develop a three-dimensional (3D) quasi-static rigid body canine pelvic limb computer model simulating a cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) intact and CrCL-deficient stifle during walking stance to describe stifle biomechanics. The model was based on a five-year-old neutered male Golden Retriever (33 kg) with no orthopedic or neurologic disease. Skeletal geometry and ligament anatomy determined from computed tomography (CT), optimized muscle forces, motion capture kinematics, and force platform ground reaction forces were used to develop the model. Ligament loads, tibial translation, tibial rotation, and femoromeniscal contact forces were compared across the intact and CrCL-deficient stifle. The CrCL was found to be the primary intact stifle load-bearing ligament, and the caudal cruciate ligament was the primary CrCL-deficient stifle load-bearing ligament. Normalized tibial translation and rotation were 0.61 mm/kg and 0.14 degrees/kg, respectively. Our model confirmed that the CrCL stabilizes the intact stifle and limits tibial translation and rotation. Model verification was confirmed through agreement with experimentally measured kinematics and previous in vivo, in vitro, and mathematical model studies. Parametric analysis indicated outcome measure sensitivity to ligament pre-strain. Computer modeling could be useful to further investigate stifle biomechanics associated with surgical stabilization techniques.

Determination of Graft Forces for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Dog

1996 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Hulse ◽  
M. R. Slater ◽  
J. F. Hunter ◽  
W. A. Hyman ◽  
B. A. Shelley
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Graft Fixation ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Patellar Ligament ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Test Apparatus ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Insertion

SummaryA test apparatus that allowed the stifle to move in five degrees of freedom was used to determine the effect of graft location, graft preload, and flexion angle at the time of graft fixation on the tensile graft forces experienced by a replacement graft material used to simulate reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle. Two graft locations (tibial insertion site of the patellar ligament and tibial insertion site of the cranial cruciate ligament), two graft preloads (5 N and 20 N), and three flexion angles at the time of graft fixation (15°, 30° and 90°) were examined. The tibial insertion site and preload did not have as great an effect on graft force as did the flexion angle of the limb at time of graft fixation. Graft forces were highest when reconstructions were performed with the limb in 90° of flexion (ρ <0.0001). This study supports the notion that intracapsular grafts should be fixed with the limb in a normal standing angle.A five degree of freedom test apparatus was used to evaluate the effect of graft location, graft preload, and limb flexion angle at time of graft fixation on reconstructions of the cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle. Our results suggest that intracapsular grafts should not be fixed with the limb in 90° of flexion, but in a normal standing angle.

An in vitro Comparison of Two Replacement Techniques Utilizing Fascia Lata after Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection in the Dog

1993 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Coetzee
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Fascia Lata ◽  
Patellar Ligament ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Replacement Technique ◽  
Over The Top

SummaryThe immediate postoperative biomechanical properties of an “underand-over” cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) replacement technique consisting of fascia lata and the lateral onethird of the patellar ligament, were compared with that of a modified intra- and extracapsular “under-and-over-the-top” (UOTT) method. The right CCL in twelve adult dogs was dissected out and replaced with an autograft. The contralateral, intact CCL served as the control. In group A, the graft was secured to the lateral femoral condyle with a spiked washer and screw. In group B the intracapsular graft was secured to the lateral femoro-fabellar ligament, and the remainder to the patellar tendon. Both CCL replacement techniques exhibited a 2.0 ± 0.5 mm anterior drawer immediately after the operation. After skeletonization of the stifles, the length and cross-sectional area of the intact CCL and CCL substitutes were determined. Each bone-ligament unit was tested in linear tension to failure at a fixed distraction rate of 15 mm/s with the stifle in 120° flexion. Data was processed to obtain the corresponding material parameters (modulus, stress and strain in the linear loading region, and energy absorption to maximum load).The immediate postoperative structural and material properties of the “under-and-over” cranial cruciate ligament replacement technique with autogenous fascia lata, were compared to that of a modified intra- and extracapsular “under-and-over-the-top” (UOTT) method. The combined UOT T technique was slightly stronger (6%), but allowed 2.8 ± 0.9 mm more cranial tibial displacement at maximum linear force.

Biomechanical Properties of the Stifle Joint Lateral Collateral Ligament in Dogs

1992 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 158-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Blackketter ◽  
J Harari ◽  
J. Dupuis
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Fibular Head ◽  
Joint Stability ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Stifle Joint

Bone/lateral collateral ligament/bone preparations were tested and structural mechanical properties compared to properties of cranial cruciate ligament in 15 dogs. The lateral collateral ligament has sufficient stiffness to provide stifle joint stability and strength to resist acute overload following fibular head transposition.

Evaluation of Positive Contrast Arthrography in Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease

1996 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 10-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.N. Aron ◽  
R. Roberts ◽  
J. Stallings ◽  
J. Brown ◽  
C.W. Hay
Keyword(s):  
Articular Surface ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Positive Contrast ◽  
Joint Effusion ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Joint Pathology ◽  
Meniscal Pathology ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease ◽  
Better Than

SummaryArthrographic and intraoperative evaluations of stifles affected with cranial cruciate disease were compared. Arthrography did not appear to be helpful in predicting cranial cruciate ligament pathology. The caudal cruciate ligament was consistently not visualized in the arthrograms and was normal at surgery. The menisci were visualized consistently in the arthrograms, but conclusions could not be made as to the benefit of arthrography in predicting meniscal pathology. Arthrography was not helpful in predicting joint capsule and femoral articular surface pathology. Survey radiographic evaluation was better than arthrography in evaluating joint pathology. When cruciate injury is suspected, after history and physical examination, survey radiographs are better than positive contrast arthrograms at supporting the diagnosis.Positive contrast arthrography was evaluated as a diagnostic aid in canine cranial cruciate ligament disease. It did not appear to be useful in predicting joint pathology. With arthrography, both menisci could be visualized and evaluated for abnormalities. Joint effusion and presence of osteophytes evaluated on survey radiographs was better than arthrography in evaluating joint pathology.

Effect of Suture Type on Stifle Joint Biomechanics After Extra-Articular Repair of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection in the Dog

1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (04) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Bauer ◽  
W. E. Blevins ◽  
W. R. Widmer ◽  
Jaqueline Davidson ◽  
S. W. Aiken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Stifle Joint ◽  
Ligament Rupture ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Rupture ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Joint Biomechanics ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture

SummaryThe effect of two suture types, monofilament polybutester and braided polyester, on stifle joint biomechanics after extra-articular repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture was evaluated by analysis of the instant centre of motion. The instant centres of motion and resulting velocity vectors were determined radiographically on both stifles of eight fresh canine cadavers before and after cranial cruciate ligament transection. After ligament transection, all 16 stifles were repaired with an extra-articular technique utilizing a double strand of suture placed between the lateral fabella and the tibial tuberosity. One stifle on each cadaver was repaired with each suture type. The instant centres of motion and resulting velocity vectors were re-evaluated post repair. All stifles had normal instant centres of motion prior to transection of the cranial cruciate ligament. Neither ligament transection nor extra-articular repair with either suture type resulted in an abnormal change in the instant centre of motion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document