Well-being and return rate of first-time whole blood donors

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peer Jansen ◽  
Ariane Sümnig ◽  
Max Esefeld ◽  
Klara Greffin ◽  
Lars Kaderali ◽  
...  
Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. France ◽  
Janis L. France ◽  
Lina K. Himawan ◽  
Louisa Duffy ◽  
Debra A. Kessler ◽  
...  

Background: Microbes at the phlebotomy site are the important source of bacterial contamination of blood products. Various methods to reduce their load at phlebotomy site have been tried and have always being improvised upon. Few of the blood centres have adopted a policy of making the donors wash their arms with soap and water before disinfection for phlebotomy. However the utility of this policy has not been studied. Aim: The aim was to study if washing the phlebotomy site with soap and water before blood donation would make an impact or change the microbiota at the site. Materials and methods: The study included 200 whole-blood donors who were randomly chosen and after obtaining an informed consent were included in the study. The donors were alternately allocated into donation arm washing (n=100) or non washing (100) group. The swabs were taken from the phlebotomy site from both the groups and cultured for microbial growth. The results were compared to see for difference between the groups. The statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics Desktop Software version 22.0. Results: Multiple organisms were isolated in only three of the 40 donors in the arm washed group compared to 24 of the 50 donors evaluated in the control arm and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusion: This simple add on step of washing the donor arm before donation reduced the microbial floral load at the phlebotomy site.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Odajima ◽  
Minoko Takanashi ◽  
Hiroki Sugimori ◽  
Junichi Sato ◽  
Chiharu Kano ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-135
Author(s):  
M Mahbub-ul-Alam ◽  
Mamun Ur Rashid ◽  
ARM Saifuddin Ekram

The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics and first time or repeat status. Attitudes towards future incentives were obtained from 2,897 whole blood donors among 5,357 allogenic donors who return a questionnaire (54.08% response rate). Majority were first time donors 67.59% (1,958) with 32.41% (939) repeated donor. Majority of the respondents were male 68.52% (1,985), female 31.48% (912). Responses to incentives were compared between first time and repeat whole blood donors. Incentives most likely to encourage donation return among all 2,897 whole blood respondents were blood screening test (B.S.T), against transfusion transmitted infection (T.T.I) 71.65%, blood credits- 61.55%, cash to charity- 43.35% and gift- 27.6%. The incentives that would be least likely to encourage return were a token or award of appreciation- 15.85%. Few donors would be discouraged to return if offered B.S.T against T.T.I (0.25%), other miscellaneous incentives (1.31%), a gift (2.15%), a token of appreciation (1.95%). Compensatory incentives could potentially have a more negative impact because 7 to 9 percent of donors reported they would be discouraged for donating if they received cash or lottery or raffle ticket. Young (18-25 years old) donors were encouraged by B.S.T against T.T.I (58.4%) and older (51 years old) donors (58.4%); more than 2 hours off work (46.2% and 13.7%); community service and / or education credits ( 44.2% and 10.7%); or compensatory incentives (56.9% and 15.8% for cash to charity 57.8% and 26.7%); gifts (39.6% and 11.4%) or a token of appreciation (27.4% and 10.0%) respectively. Blood screening and blood credits would be well received at all donation sites. Gift, compensatory incentives and token of appreciation appeal more to younger donors. These data may allow blood centers to optimize recruitment by tailoring limited incentive recourses more effectively. doi: 10.3329/taj.v20i2.3074 TAJ 2007; 20(2): 129-135


Transfusion ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1398-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce H. Newman ◽  
Barry A. Siegfried ◽  
Laura A. Buchanan

Crisis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danica W. Y. Liu ◽  
A. Kate Fairweather-Schmidt ◽  
Richard Burns ◽  
Rachel M. Roberts ◽  
Kaarin J. Anstey

Abstract. Background: Little is known about the role of resilience in the likelihood of suicidal ideation (SI) over time. Aims: We examined the association between resilience and SI in a young-adult cohort over 4 years. Our objectives were to determine whether resilience was associated with SI at follow-up or, conversely, whether SI was associated with lowered resilience at follow-up. Method: Participants were selected from the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life Project from Canberra and Queanbeyan, Australia, aged 28–32 years at the first time point and 32–36 at the second. Multinomial, linear, and binary regression analyses explored the association between resilience and SI over two time points. Models were adjusted for suicidality risk factors. Results: While unadjusted analyses identified associations between resilience and SI, these effects were fully explained by the inclusion of other suicidality risk factors. Conclusion: Despite strong cross-sectional associations, resilience and SI appear to be unrelated in a longitudinal context, once risk/resilience factors are controlled for. As independent indicators of psychological well-being, suicidality and resilience are essential if current status is to be captured. However, the addition of other factors (e.g., support, mastery) makes this association tenuous. Consequently, resilience per se may not be protective of SI.


Author(s):  
Anusha P ◽  
Bankar Nandkishor J ◽  
Karan Jain ◽  
Ramdas Brahmane ◽  
Dhrubha Hari Chandi

INTRODUCTION: India being the second highly populated nation in the world. HIV/AIDS has acquired pandemic proportion in the world. Estimate by WHO for current infection rate in Asia. India has the third largest HIV epidemic in the world. HIV prevalence in the age group 15-49 yrs was an estimate of 0.2%. India has been classified as an intermediate in the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) endemic (HBsAg carriage 2-7%) zone with the second largest global pool of chronic HBV infections. Safety assessment of the blood supply, the quality of screening measures and the risk of transfusion transmitted infectious diseases (TTIs) in any country can be estimated by scrutinizing the files of blood donors. After the introduction of the blood banks and improved storage facilities, it became more extensively used. Blood is one of the major sources of TTIs like hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, syphilis, and many other blood borne diseases. Disclosure of these threats brought a dramatic change in attitude of physicians and patients about blood transfusion. The objective of this study is to determine the seroprevalence of transfusion transmitted infections amidst voluntary blood donors at a rural tertiary healthcare teaching hospital in Chhattisgarh. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out in Chandulal Chandrakar Memorial Medical College, Kachandur, Durg. Blood donors were volunteers, or and commercial donors who donated the blood and paid by patients, their families, or friends to replace blood used or expected to be used for patients from the blood bank of the hospital. After proper donation of blood routine screening of blood was carried out according to standard protocol. Laboratory diagnosis of HIV 1 and HIV 2 was carried out by ELISA test. Hepatitis B surface antigen was screened by using ELISA. RESULTS: A total of 1915 consecutive blood donors’ sera were screened at Chandulal Chandrakar Memorial Medical College, blood bank during study period. Of these 1914 were male and 1 female. The mean age of patients was found to be 29.34 years with standard deviation (SD) of 11.65 Years. Among all blood donors in present study, 759(39.63%) were first time donors and 1156(60.37%) were repeated donors. 1 patient was HIV positive in first donation group while 3 (75%) were positive in repeat donation group. 7 (38.9%) were HBsAg positive in in first donation group while 11(61.1%) were positive in repeat donation group. Two patients in first donation group had dual infection of HIV and HBsAg. CONCLUSION: Seropositivity was high in repeated donors as compared to first time donors. The incidence of HIV is observed to be 0.2% and that of HBsAg is 0.94%. Strict selection of blood donors should be done to avoid transfusion-transmissible infections during the window period.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-255
Author(s):  
Maria Magdalena Setyaningsih ◽  
Emy Sutiyarsih

Kehamilan remaja adalah kehamilan yang terjadi pada remaja berusia kurang dari 20 tahunan. Kehamilan remaja memberikan banyak kerugian bagi kesehatan, mental dan psikologis, kesejahteraan ekonomi dan peluang karier, kemiskinan dan prospek kehidupan masa depan remaja. Tujuan penelitian mengidentifikasi faktor determinan yang melatarbelakangi terjadinya kehamilan remaja. Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian analitik kategorik jenis survei kuantitatif dengan desain case control. Populasi semua perempuan yang bertempat tinggal di wilayah dusun Wonosari, Sukosari, dan Krajan Pandansari dan pernah/sedang hamil pertama kali pada usia kurang dari 20 tahun. Teknik pengambilan sampel cluster random sampling besar sampel 73. Berdasarkan hasil model akhir analisis multivariat, diketahui bahwa variabel pendidikan, riwayat kehamilan remaja pada keluarga dan usia menikah merupakan variabel yang berhubungan dengan kejadian kehamilan remaja setelah dikontrol oleh variabel akses informasi, responden berpendidikan rendah memiliki peluang 20,8 kali lebih tinggi, responden yang memiliki riwayat kehamilan remaja pada keluarga memiliki peluang 14,9 kali lebih tinggi, responden yang menikah pada usia <20 tahun memiliki peluang 12,1 kali lebih tinggi, responden dengan pemahaman yang kurang baik terkait penggunaan kondom memiliki peluang 5,9 kali lebih tinggi untuk terjadi kehamilan remaja. Oleh karena itu perlu dibangun karakter buiding, sosial karakter suport untuk para ibu remaja dan keluarga sehingga terbangun interaksi yang baik dalam keluarga yang dilandasi dengan pendidikan dan pemahaman yang baik tentang Pendidikan seksualitas. Teen pregnancy is a pregnancy that occurs in adolescents aged less than 20 years old. Teen pregnancy provides many disadvantages for health, mental, psychological, economic well-being, career opportunities, poverty, and the future life. The aim of the study was to identify the determinants underlying teen pregnancy incidence. This study was a quantitative study with categorical analytic method. The study design used a case control with two comparison groups. The groups were control group and case group. The population in this study was all women who lived in the Wonosari, Sukosari, and Krajan Pandansari district and had or were pregnant for the first time at the age of less than 20 years old. Seventy three respondents were recruited using cluster sampling technique. The case group consists of women who were or had pregnant for the first time at the age of less than 20 years old and their children are currently aged ≤ 1 years old. The control group consists of women who were pregnant for the first time at the age of > 20 years old. The data was collected using a questionnaire. The findings showed that education, history of teen pregnancy in family and the age of marriage were related to the incidence of teen pregnancy after being controlled by information access. Low-educated respondents had 20.8 times higher chance of experiencing teen pregnancy; respondents with a history of teen pregnancy in the family had 4.9 times higher chance of experiencing teen pregnancy; respondents who were married at the age of < 20 years old had 12.1 times higher chance of experiencing teen pregnancy; respondents with poor understanding of condom use had 5.9 times higher chance of teenage pregnancy. In conclusion, the findings suggest to build good interactions in the family based on education and a good understanding of sex education.


Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mindy Goldman ◽  
Mary Townsend ◽  
Karin Magnussen ◽  
Miquel Lozano ◽  
Lise Sofie H. Nissen‐Meyer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document