scholarly journals Relations between preschooler social competence and coping tactics during resource‐based conflicts

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1051-1070
Author(s):  
Olivia I. Nichols ◽  
Brian E. Vaughn ◽  
Gabrielle Coppola ◽  
Nana Shin ◽  
Lígia Monteiro ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 1444-1450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Rosansky ◽  
Jeffery Cook ◽  
Harold Rosenberg ◽  
Jon E. Sprague

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig K. Ewart ◽  
Randall S. Jorgensen ◽  
Sonia Suchday ◽  
Edith Chen ◽  
Karen A. Matthews

1993 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Kliewer ◽  
Irwin N. Sandler

1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1179-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Strutton ◽  
James Lumpkin

The work environment is often stressful; however, the specific coping strategies used by individuals to deal with such stress have received limited attention. While the benefits associated with optimism have long been touted, little insight has been developed regarding the mechanism(s) that may contribute to optimists' superior job performance. It is possible that optimism is associated with higher performance because it influences the coping strategies used by salespeople. This possibility was addressed in a cross-sectional study of 101 salespeople. Dispositionally optimistic salespersons were observed to rely more on problem-focused coping strategies, while pessimists engaged in emotion-focused coping. But the specific coping tactics that emerged and the extent to which these tactics were used differed substantially from those which research conducted in other, nonsales settings would have predicted.


2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck ◽  
Danielle Lees ◽  
Ellen A. Skinner

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0249127
Author(s):  
Balazs Aczel ◽  
Marton Kovacs ◽  
Tanja van der Lippe ◽  
Barnabas Szaszi

The flexibility allowed by the mobilization of technology disintegrated the traditional work-life boundary for most professionals. Whether working from home is the key or impediment to academics’ efficiency and work-life balance became a daunting question for both scientists and their employers. The recent pandemic brought into focus the merits and challenges of working from home on a level of personal experience. Using a convenient sampling, we surveyed 704 academics while working from home and found that the pandemic lockdown decreased the work efficiency for almost half of the researchers but around a quarter of them were more efficient during this time compared to the time before. Based on the gathered personal experience, 70% of the researchers think that in the future they would be similarly or more efficient than before if they could spend more of their work-time at home. They indicated that in the office they are better at sharing thoughts with colleagues, keeping in touch with their team, and collecting data, whereas at home they are better at working on their manuscript, reading the literature, and analyzing their data. Taking well-being also into account, 66% of them would find it ideal to work more from home in the future than they did before the lockdown. These results draw attention to how working from home is becoming a major element of researchers’ life and that we have to learn more about its influencer factors and coping tactics in order to optimize its arrangements.


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Schaffer ◽  
Mary Pritchard
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document