Identifying resting state differences salient for resilience to chronic pain based on machine learning multivariate pattern analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beibei You ◽  
Hongwei Wen ◽  
Todd Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Resting State ◽  
Pattern Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Pattern Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Pattern

scholarly journals Identifying Depressed Essential Tremor Using Resting-State Voxel-Wise Global Brain Connectivity: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufen Li ◽  
Li Tao ◽  
Huiyue Chen ◽  
Hansheng Wang ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Essential Tremor ◽  
Resting State ◽  
Pattern Analysis ◽  
Brain Connectivity ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Multivariate Pattern Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Pattern ◽  
Global Brain

Background and Objective: Although depression is one of the most common non-motor symptoms in essential tremor (ET), its pathogenesis and diagnosis biomarker are still unknown. Recently, machine learning multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) combined with connectivity mapping of resting-state fMRI has provided a promising way to identify patients with depressed ET at the individual level and help to reveal the brain network pathogenesis of depression in patients with ET.Methods: Based on global brain connectivity (GBC) mapping from 41 depressed ET, 49 non-depressed ET, 45 primary depression, and 43 healthy controls (HCs), multiclass Gaussian process classification (GPC) and binary support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were used to identify patients with depressed ET from non-depressed ET, primary depression, and HCs, and the accuracy and permutation tests were used to assess the classification performance.Results: While the total accuracy (40.45%) of four-class GPC was poor, the four-class GPC could discriminate depressed ET from non-depressed ET, primary depression, and HCs with a sensitivity of 70.73% (P < 0.001). At the same time, the sensitivity of using binary SVM to discriminate depressed ET from non-depressed ET, primary depression, and HCs was 73.17, 80.49, and 75.61%, respectively (P < 0.001). The significant discriminative features were mainly located in cerebellar-motor-prefrontal cortex circuits (P < 0.001), and a further correlation analysis showed that the GBC values of significant discriminative features in the right middle prefrontal gyrus, bilateral cerebellum VI, and Crus 1 were correlated with clinical depression severity in patients with depressed ET.Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that GBC mapping combined with machine learning MVPA could be used to identify patients with depressed ET, and the GBC changes in cerebellar-prefrontal cortex circuits not only posed as the significant discriminative features but also helped to understand the network pathogenesis underlying depression in patients with ET.

scholarly journals Deep-Learning-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis (dMVPA): A Tutorial and a Toolbox

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl M. Kuntzelman ◽  
Jacob M. Williams ◽  
Phui Cheng Lim ◽  
Ashok Samal ◽  
Prahalada K. Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Pattern Analysis ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Multivariate Pattern Analysis ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Neuroimaging Data ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Multivariate Pattern

In recent years, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) has been hugely beneficial for cognitive neuroscience by making new experiment designs possible and by increasing the inferential power of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and other neuroimaging methodologies. In a similar time frame, “deep learning” (a term for the use of artificial neural networks with convolutional, recurrent, or similarly sophisticated architectures) has produced a parallel revolution in the field of machine learning and has been employed across a wide variety of applications. Traditional MVPA also uses a form of machine learning, but most commonly with much simpler techniques based on linear calculations; a number of studies have applied deep learning techniques to neuroimaging data, but we believe that those have barely scratched the surface of the potential deep learning holds for the field. In this paper, we provide a brief introduction to deep learning for those new to the technique, explore the logistical pros and cons of using deep learning to analyze neuroimaging data – which we term “deep MVPA,” or dMVPA – and introduce a new software toolbox (the “Deep Learning In Neuroimaging: Exploration, Analysis, Tools, and Education” package, DeLINEATE for short) intended to facilitate dMVPA for neuroscientists (and indeed, scientists more broadly) everywhere.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document