scholarly journals The 5-methyl-deoxy-cytidine (5mdC) localization to reveal in situ the dynamics of DNA methylation chromatin pattern in a variety of plant organ and tissue cells during development

2012 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar S. Testillano ◽  
María-Teresa Solís ◽  
María C. Risueño
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (20) ◽  
pp. 7459
Author(s):  
María Elena González-Benito ◽  
Miguel Ángel Ibáñez ◽  
Michela Pirredda ◽  
Sara Mira ◽  
Carmen Martín

Epigenetic variation, and particularly DNA methylation, is involved in plasticity and responses to changes in the environment. Conservation biology studies have focused on the measurement of this variation to establish demographic parameters, diversity levels and population structure to design the appropriate conservation strategies. However, in ex situ conservation approaches, the main objective is to guarantee the characteristics of the conserved material (phenotype and epi-genetic). We review the use of the Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) technique to detect changes in the DNA methylation patterns of plant material conserved by the main ex situ plant conservation methods: seed banks, in vitro slow growth and cryopreservation. Comparison of DNA methylation patterns before and after conservation is a useful tool to check the fidelity of the regenerated plants, and, at the same time, may be related with other genetic variations that might appear during the conservation process (i.e., somaclonal variation). Analyses of MSAP profiles can be useful in the management of ex situ plant conservation but differs in the approach used in the in situ conservation. Likewise, an easy-to-use methodology is necessary for a rapid interpretation of data, in order to be readily implemented by conservation managers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolin Dippmann ◽  
Martina Schmitz ◽  
Kristina Wunsch ◽  
Stefanie Schütze ◽  
Katrin Beer ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based screening is becoming increasingly important, either by supplementing or replacing the traditional cytology-based cervical Pap smear. However, hrHPV screening lacks specificity, because it cannot differentiate between transient virus infection and clinically relevant hrHPV-induced disease. Therefore, reliable triage methods are needed for the identification of HPV-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in need of treatment. Promising tools discussed for the triage of these patients are molecular diagnostic tests based on epigenetic markers. Here, we compare the performance of two commercially available DNA methylation-based diagnostic assays—GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test—in physician-taken cervical scrapes from 195 subjects. Findings Both GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test detected all cervical carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The differences observed in the detection rates between both assays for the different grades of cervical lesions (QIAsure Methylation Test: CIN1 26.7%, CIN2 27.8% and CIN3 74.3%; GynTect®: CIN1 13.3%, CIN2 33.3% and CIN3 60%) were not significant. Concerning the false-positive rates, significant differences were evident. For the healthy (NILM) hrHPV-positive group, the false-positive rates were 5.7% for GynTect® and 26.4% for QIAsure Methylation Test (p = 0.003) and for the NILM hrHPV-negative group 2.2% vs. 23.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. When considering hrHPV-positive samples only for comparison (n = 149), GynTect® delivered significantly higher specificity compared to the QIAsure Methylation Test for CIN2 + (87.6% vs. 67.4% (p < 0.001)) and CIN3 + (84.1% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.002)). Overall our findings suggest that DNA methylation-based tests are suitable for the triage of hrHPV-positive women. With the goal to provide a triage test that complements the limited specificity of HPV testing in HPV-based screening, GynTect® may be preferable, due to its higher specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ .


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. Johnson ◽  
Panpan Chen ◽  
Devin Koestler ◽  
Julia E. Weiss ◽  
Erik G. Jenson ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e21443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suhaida A. Selamat ◽  
Janice S. Galler ◽  
Amit D. Joshi ◽  
M. Nicky Fyfe ◽  
Mihaela Campan ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslaug Aa Muggerud ◽  
Jo Anders Rønneberg ◽  
Fredrik Wärnberg ◽  
Johan Botling ◽  
Florence Busato ◽  
...  

Genome ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Manicardi ◽  
D. Bizzaro ◽  
P. Azzoni ◽  
U. Bianchi

Chromosomal and purified DNA methylation patterns were determined in the holocentric chromosomes of Megoura viciae by treatment with MspI and HpaII. Both enzymes produced a clear C-like banding pattern but widely digested one telomere of the X chromosome, which appeared as heterochromatic after C-banding treatment and brightly fluorescent after chromomycin A3 staining. Quantitative microfluorometric evaluations of DNA extraction performed on cytological preparations showed that both isoschizomers resulted in the same DNA extraction (about 30%). Contrary to what was found by in situ endonuclease treatment, the electrophoretic patterns of purified and digested DNA showed that digestion with MspI was slightly more extensive than that with HpaII in a zone of fragments ranging from 23 to 9 kb. This result indicates that aphid chromatin is not wholly unmethylated. The discrepancy between electrophoretic and cytological data has been explained by taking into consideration that DNA fragments with high molecular weights could be cleaved in situ by the enzymes but not extracted from the chromatin.Key words: aphids, DNA methylation, holocentric chromosomes, heterochromatin, restriction enzyme bandings.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (39) ◽  
pp. 65281-65291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Hsuan Su ◽  
Yao-Wen Hsu ◽  
Rui-Lan Huang ◽  
Yu-Chun Weng ◽  
Hui-Chen Wang ◽  
...  

ACS Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Zhao ◽  
Donghan Ma ◽  
Junkai Xie ◽  
Oscar Sanchez ◽  
Fang Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document