scholarly journals Beyond Just Justice - Creating Space for a Future-Care Ethic

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Makoff ◽  
Rupert Read
Keyword(s):  
Care Ethic ◽  
Future Care

Care Ethics and Obligations to Future Generations

Hypatia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-545
Author(s):  
Thomas Randall
Keyword(s):  
Care Ethics ◽  
Relational Structure ◽  
Future Generations ◽  
Care Ethic ◽  
Mutual Advantage ◽  
Theories Of Justice ◽  
Future Care ◽  
Caring Relations ◽  
Intergenerational Ethics

A dominant area of inquiry within intergenerational ethics concerns how goods (and bads) ought to be justly distributed between noncontemporaries. Contractualist theories of justice that have broached these discussions have often centered on the concepts of mutual advantage and (indirect) reciprocal cooperation between rational, self‐interested beings. However, another prominent reason that many in the present feel that they have obligations toward future generations is not due to self‐interested reciprocity, but simply because they care about what happens to them. Care ethics promises to be conceptually well‐suited for articulating this latter reason: given that future generations are in a perpetual condition of dependency on present‐day people's actions, this is precisely the kind of relational structure that care theorists should be interested in morally evaluating. Unfortunately, the care literature has been largely silent on intergenerational ethics. This article aims to advance this literature, offering the blueprints of what a care ethic concerning future generations—a “future care ethic”—should look like. The resultant ethic defends a sufficientarian theory of obligation: people in the present ought to ensure the conditions needed to encourage and sustain a world that enables good caring relations to flourish.

An introduction to advance care planning: practice at the frontline

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Mullick ◽  
Jonathan Martin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Use Case ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Practical Advice ◽  
Future Care ◽  
Case Vignettes ◽  
Advance Care

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of formal decision-making that aims to help patients establish decisions about future care that take effect when they lose capacity. In our experience, guidance for clinicians rarely provides detailed practical advice on how it can be successfully carried out in a clinical setting. This may create a barrier to ACP discussions which might otherwise benefit patients, families and professionals. The focus of this paper is on sharing our experience of ACP as clinicians and offering practical tips on elements of ACP, such as triggers for conversations, communication skills, and highlighting the formal aspects that are potentially involved. We use case vignettes to better illustrate the application of ACP in clinical practice.

Advance care planning: the future

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002304
Author(s):  
Judith Rietjens ◽  
Ida Korfage ◽  
Mark Taubert
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Decisional Capacity ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Awareness Campaigns ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Future Care ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Improve Patient

ObjectivesThere is increased global focus on advance care planning (ACP) with attention from policymakers, more education programmes, laws and public awareness campaigns.MethodsWe provide a summary of the evidence about what ACP is, and how it should be conducted. We also address its barriers and facilitators and discuss current and future models of ACP, including a wider look at how to best integrate those who have diminished decisional capacity.ResultsDifferent models are analysed, including new work in Wales (future care planning which includes best interest decision-making for those without decisional capacity), Asia and in people with dementia.ConclusionsACP practices are evolving. While ACP is a joint responsibility of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals, more clarity on how to apply best ACP practices to include people with diminished capacity will further improve patient-centred care.

scholarly journals STEMI and COVID ‐19: Unmasking failures and opportunities to enhance future care

2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-216
Author(s):  
Reshma R. Golamari ◽  
Ian C. Gilchrist
Keyword(s):  
Future Care

scholarly journals Older survivors of cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic: Reflections and recommendations for future care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen R. Haase ◽  
Danielle Kain ◽  
Shaila Merchant ◽  
Christopher Booth ◽  
Rachel Koven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Future Care

7 Exploring healthcare professionals’ attitudes to future care planning with older adults in hospital: qualitative research co-design through multi-professional patient and carer involvement

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 362.2-362
Author(s):  
Anna-Maria Bielinska ◽  
Stephanie Archer ◽  
Catherine Urch ◽  
Ara Darzi
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
List Type ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Topic Guide ◽  
Future Care ◽  
Advance Care

IntroductionDespite evidence that advance care planning in older hospital inpatients improves the quality of end-of-life care (Detering 2010) future care planning (FCP) with older adults remains to be normalised in hospital culture. It is therefore crucial to understand the attitudes of healthcare professionals to FCP in older patients in the hospital setting. Co-design with patients carers and healthcare professionals can generate more detailed meaningful data through better conversations.AimsTo co-design a semi-structured interview (SSI) topic guide to explore healthcare professionals’ attitudes to FCP with older adults in hospital.MethodsA multi-professional research group including a panel of patient and carer representatives co-designed an in-depth topic guide for a SSI exploring healthcare professionals’ attitudes to FCP with older adults in hospital.ResultsThe co-designed topic guide encourages participants to explore personal and system-level factors that may influence attitudes to FCP and practice in hospital amongst healthcare staff. Co-designed topics for inclusion in the SSI schedule include:Potential differences between specialist and generalist approaches to FCPThe influence of perceived hierarchy and emergency–decision making ability in professionals on FCP discussionsThe relevance to transitions of careAttitudes to FCP beyond the biomedical paradigm including perceived well–being and psychosocial aspects of careDigital FCP tools including patient–led FCP.ConclusionCo-designing qualitative research with older people and multi-disciplinary professionals may narrow translational gaps in implementing FCP by setting joint research priorities. Data generated from a co-designed study may expand understanding of hospital-based anticipatory decision-making with older adults.Reference. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ23 March 2010;340:c1345.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of circulating markers of neutrophil activation, neutrophil extracellular traps, coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with terminal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Rosell ◽  
Katherina Aguilera ◽  
Yohei Hisada ◽  
Clare Schmedes ◽  
Nigel Mackman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps ◽  
Neutrophil Activation ◽  
Terminal Cancer ◽  
Extracellular Traps ◽  
Terminal Cancer Patients ◽  
Future Care ◽  
Circulating Markers ◽  
Coagulation And Fibrinolysis

AbstractPredicting survival accurately in patients with advanced cancer is important in guiding interventions and planning future care. Objective tools are therefore needed. Blood biomarkers are appealing due to their rapid measurement and objective nature. Thrombosis is a common complication in cancer. Recent data indicate that tumor-induced neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are pro-thrombotic. We therefore performed a comprehensive investigation of circulating markers of neutrophil activation, NET formation, coagulation and fibrinolysis in 106 patients with terminal cancer. We found that neutrophil activation and NET markers were prognostic in terminal cancer patients. Interestingly, markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis did not have a prognostic value in this patient group, and there were weak or no correlations between these markers and markers of neutrophil activation and NETs. This suggest that NETs are linked to a poor prognosis through pathways independent of coagulation. Additional studies are needed to determine the utility of circulating neutrophil activation and NET markers, alone or in concert with established clinical parameters, as objective and reliable prognostic tools in advanced cancer.

Care Ethics: A Concept in Search of a Framework

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erich H. Loewy
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ethical Decision ◽  
Ethical Decision Making ◽  
Care Ethics ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
The Other ◽  
Care Ethic ◽  
The Relationship

In this paper, I want to try to put what has been termed the “care ethics” into a different perspective. While I will discuss primarily the use of that ethic or that term as it applies to the healthcare setting in general and to the deliberation of consultants or the function of committees more specifically, what I have to say is meant to be applicable to the problem of using a notion like “caring” as a fundamental precept in ethical decision making. I will set out to examine the relationship between theoretical ethics, justice-based reasoning, and care-based reasoning and conclude by suggesting not only that all are part of a defensible solution when adjudicating individual cases, but that these three are linked and can, in fact, be mutually corrective. I will claim that using what has been called “the care ethic” alone is grossly insufficient for solving individual problems and that the term can (especially when used without a disciplined framework) be extremely dangerous. I will readily admit that while blindly using an approach based solely on theoretically derived principles is perhaps somewhat less dangerous, it is bound to be sterile, unsatisfying, and perhaps even cruel in individual situations. Care ethics, as I understand the concept, is basically a non- or truly an anti-intellectual kind of ethic in that it tries not only to value feeling over thought in deliberating problems of ethics, but indeed, would almost entirely substitute feeling for thought. Feeling when used to underwrite undisciplined and intuitive action without theory has no head and, therefore, no plan and no direction; theory eventuating in sterile rules and eventually resulting in action heedlessly based on such rules lacks humanity and heart. Neither one nor the other is complete in itself. There is no reason why we necessarily should be limited to choosing between these two extremes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document