scholarly journals Taxonomic identification using virtual palaeontology and geometric morphometrics: a case study of Jurassic nerineoidean gastropods

Palaeontology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Leshno Afriat ◽  
Yael Edelman‐Furstenberg ◽  
Rivka Rabinovich ◽  
Jonathan A. Todd ◽  
Hila May
Author(s):  
Filipe O. Costa ◽  
Marina R. Cunha ◽  
Teresa Neuparth ◽  
Christopher W. Theodorakis ◽  
M. Helena Costa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 103824
Author(s):  
Bader H. Alhajeri ◽  
Randa Alaqeely ◽  
Hasan Alhaddad

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Pere Miquel Parés-Casanova ◽  
Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño ◽  
René Alejandro Crosby-Granados ◽  
Jannet Bentez-Molano

Skull size and shape have been widely used to study domestic animal populations and breeds. Although several techniques have been proposed to quantify cranial form, few attempts have been made to compare the results obtained by different techniques. While linear morphometrics has traditionally been used in breed characterization, recent advances in geometric morphometrics have created new techniques for specifically quantifying shape and size. The objective of this study was to compare two morphometric methods for their ability to describe external morphology. For this purpose, 20 skull specimens of adult male Araucanian horses were examined. Two age categories were established (the “mature group”, M3 not fully erupted to moderately worn, n = 7; and the “senile group”, M3 totally erupted and highly worn, n = 13). Both methods showed that there were statistical differences between generations, but discrimination rates were different between methods with the geometric morphometric analysis obtaining a rate of 97.5%. Although linear morphometrics was found to be compatible with geometric morphometrics, the latter was better able to discriminate the two groups and it also provides more information on shape.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document