scholarly journals A systematic review to determine the impact of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs on dental implant osseointegration

Oral Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
M. Dave ◽  
N. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
The Impact

What is the impact of bisphosphonate therapy upon dental implant survival? A systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e38-e46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ata-Ali ◽  
Fadi Ata-Ali ◽  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra ◽  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bisphosphonate Therapy ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rheumatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 736-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patompong Ungprasert ◽  
Narat Srivali ◽  
Karn Wijarnpreecha ◽  
Prangthip Charoenpong ◽  
Eric L. Knight
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Impact of dental implant diameter on the efficiency of fatigue - a systematic review analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Mohamed Tharwat Hamed ◽  
Hisham Abdullah Mously ◽  
Moayyad Motaz Ghulman ◽  
Ghada Hussein Naguib
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Wide Diameter ◽  
Review Analysis ◽  
Body Fracture ◽  
Extensive Literature Search ◽  
Technical Complication ◽  
Performance Results ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective: The present study explains the success and failure of dental implant diameter on the efficiency of fatigue by conducting a systematic review analysis. Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted to carry out systematic review using different scholarly platforms and libraries. A total of 12 studies published within the past 20-year time (1999-2019) were included following the inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the PRISMA guidelines. Additionally, the study outcomes were evaluated to determine their perceptions regarding the role of dental implant diameter in influencing the implant’s fatigue performance. Results: The implant diameter can be categorized into wide diameter (5-6 mm), regular diameter (3.75-4 mm), and small/narrow diameter (3-3.4 mm). The narrow diameter implants are indicated through thin alveolar ridges and mesiodistal spaces (less than 7 mm). The implants with narrow diameter would offer greater risk of fatigue failure for clinical situations with significant functional loading. No significant differences were found either in success or failure of dental implant diameter on fatigue efficiency after 1-year and 3-year follow-up. Conclusion: The technical complication of dental implant include abutment screw loosening or fracture, abutment and superstructure fracture, and implant body fracture. The study has study has mainly focused on the impact of dental implant diameter on the efficiency of fatigue and reviewed a significant impact of dental implant diameter on the fatigue efficiency. Keywords: Dental Implants, Efficiency, Perception. Continuous...

scholarly journals Perioperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs might impair dental implant osseointegration

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e1-e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent Winnett ◽  
Howard C. Tenenbaum ◽  
Ben Ganss ◽  
Asbjørn Jokstad
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

scholarly journals Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Their Neuroprotective Role After an Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Animal Models

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822090168
Author(s):  
Mark J. Lambrechts ◽  
James L. Cook
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Improve Motor Function ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) resulting in motor deficits can be devastating injuries resulting in millions of health care dollars spent per incident. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a potential class of drugs that could improve motor function after an SCI. This systematic review utilizes PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the effectiveness of NSAIDs for SCI. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were reviewed linking the keywords of “ibuprofen,” “meloxicam,” “naproxen,” “ketorolac,” “indomethacin,” “celecoxib,” “ATB-346,” “NSAID,” and “nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug” with “spinal.” Results were reviewed for relevance and included if they met inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE checklist was used to assess sources of bias. Results: A total of 2960 studies were identified in the PubMed/MEDLINE database using the above-mentioned search criteria. A total of 461 abstracts were reviewed in Scopus, 340 in CINAHL, 179 in PsycINFO, and 7632 in Embase. A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: NSAIDs’ effectiveness after SCI is largely determined by its ability to inhibit Rho-A. NSAIDs are a promising therapeutic option in acute SCI patients because they appear to decrease cord edema and inflammation, increase axonal sprouting, and improve motor function with minimal side effects. Studies are limited by heterogeneity, small sample size, and the use of animal models, which might not replicate the therapeutic effects in humans. There are no published human studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of these drugs after a traumatic cord injury. There is a need for well-designed prospective studies evaluating ibuprofen or indomethacin after adult spinal cord injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document