scholarly journals “Making the best of what we have”: The lived experiences of community psychiatric nurses, day centre managers and social workers supporting clients with dementia attending a generic day care service

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e12157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Laird ◽  
Phyllis McGurk ◽  
Bernie Reid ◽  
Assumpta Ryan
1978 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. H. Anstee

SummaryThis paper describes a supported lodgings scheme as an alternative to group homes. It is pointed out that the County Council has a statutory duty to finance supported lodgings and that schizophrenics are ideally suited to such a scheme. Some short-stay, the majority of the ‘new’ non-demented long-stay, and a large number of the ‘old’ long-stay patients have been discharged by this means. Aftercare facilities were important, as nearly half attended the day centre and over one third were regularly visited in their lodgings by the community psychiatric nurses and social workers.


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant Blair ◽  
Carl Deaney

A survey of people with schizophrenia in an inner-city general practice was undertaken to identify levels of social disability, service receipt and patterns of care received. Contacts with general practitioners, psychiatrists, community psychiatric nurses and social workers were quantified, and the nature of the contacts assessed. Overall social disability for the group was marked (mean Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) rating 55.5). There was a correlation coefficient of +0.899 between the numbers of agencies involved and the overall HoNOS scores suggesting appropriate targeting of care. While there were few differences in the HoNOS ratings of the various contact subsets, there were significant differences in the extent of agencies contact with patients, the greatest number of contacts being in general practice. Limited information sharing, the absence of a formal shared care plan and sectorisation of services are thought to obstruct more effective general practice involvement in care.


1988 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wooff ◽  
D. P. Goldberg

Differences in the clinical characteristics of clients have not been found to account for the interprofessional differences in community psychiatric nurses' and mental health social workers' practice in Salford. We found the consultant-attached mental health social workers, who worked closely with the specialist psychiatric team and who received supportive supervision from their professional managers, maintained stable case-loads, but the primary-care attached community psychiatric nurses, who were isolated from the specialist psychiatric team, and who received little supportive supervision from their professional managers, carried case-loads of increasing size. Failure to improve the way in which services for the mentally ill in the community are co-ordinated is likely to perpetuate the worst characteristics of life in the old back wards into the era of ‘community care’.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Gask ◽  
Justine Croft

By the 1980s, one-fifth of all general psychiatrists in England and Wales (Strathdee & Williams, 1984) and one-half in Scotland (Pullen & Yellowlees, 1988) were spending some proportion of their time working in primary care. Rather than limit this process, the growth of general practice fundholding fostered it and developments in general practice total purchasing and extended fundholding have encouraged it further (Lee et al, 1999). At the same time, nationally there has been a gradual increase in referrals directly from general practitioners (GPs) to community psychiatric nurses (CPNs). Referrals from GPs constituted 37% of all referrals to CPNs in 1990 and 46% in 1996 (Brooker & White, 1997: further details available from L.G. upon request), even though there has been a trend away from the primary care service base (21% in 1990 compared with 14% in 1996).


1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 419-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Stevenson

Today the practice of psychiatry often involves a multi-disciplinary team comprising doctors, nurses, psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists, community psychiatric nurses and physiotherapists. Each discipline has its own contribution to make to the planning of care programmes for patients in the context of a team approach.


1991 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Peet ◽  
Norman S. Harvey

A videotape lecture and written hand-out containing factual information about lithium were given to 30 attenders at a lithium clinic. A further 30 patients acted as a control group and were not given the programme until later in the study. The educational programme resulted in substantial and significant increases in patient knowledge about lithium, such that knowledge increased from a baseline comparable with that of social workers to a level similar to that of community psychiatric nurses. Patients' attitudes to lithium also became more favourable after education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document