Do analgesics used for the pain experienced after orthodontic procedures affect tooth movement rate? A systematic review based on animal studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-150
Author(s):  
Eleftherios G. Kaklamanos ◽  
Miltiadis A. Makrygiannakis ◽  
Athanasios E. Athanasiou
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Movement Rate ◽  
Tooth Movement Rate

scholarly journals Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre da C. Monini ◽  
Luiz G. Gandini ◽  
Alexandre P. Vianna ◽  
Renato P. Martins ◽  
Helder B. Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
The Other ◽  
Movement Rate ◽  
Canine Retraction ◽  
Lower Canine ◽  
Anchorage Loss ◽  
Tooth Movement Rate

ABSTRACT Objectives: To investigate the canine retraction rate and anchorage loss during canine retraction using self-ligating (SL) brackets and conventional (CV) brackets. Differences between maxillary and mandibular rates were computed. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five subjects requiring four first premolar extractions were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Each patient had one upper canine and one lower canine bonded randomly with SL brackets and the other canines with CV brackets but never on the same side. NiTi retraction springs were used to retract canines (100 g force). Maxillary and mandibular superimpositions, using cephalometric 45° oblique radiographs at the beginning and at the end of canine retraction, were used to calculate the changes and rates during canine retraction. Paired t-tests were used to compare side and jaw effects. Results: The SL and CV brackets did not show differences related to monthly canine movement in the maxilla (0.71 mm and 0.72 mm, respectively) or in the mandible (0.54 mm and 0.60 mm, respectively). Rates of anchorage loss in the maxilla and in the mandible also did not show differences between the SL and CV brackets. Maxillary canines showed greater amount of tooth movement per month than mandibular canines (0.71 mm and 0.57 mm, respectively). Conclusions: SL brackets did not show faster canine retraction compared with CV brackets nor less anchorage loss. The maxillary canines showed a greater rate of tooth movement than the mandibular canines; however, no difference in anchorage loss between the maxillary and mandibular posterior segments during canine retraction was found.

Tooth Movement in Orthodontic Treatment with Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Systematic Review of Human and Animal Studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Carvalho-Lobato ◽  
Valentin Javier Garcia ◽  
Khaled Kasem ◽  
Josep Maria Ustrell-Torrent ◽  
Victòria Tallón-Walton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

scholarly journals Applicative Characteristics of a New Zirconia Bracket with Multiple Slots

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koutaro Maki ◽  
Katsuyoshi Futaki ◽  
Satoru Tanabe ◽  
Mariko Takahashi ◽  
Yuta Ichikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Movement Rate ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tooth Movement Rate

We have developed a new orthodontic bracket with three slots with lubricative properties on the working surfaces and proposed a new orthodontic treatment system employing 0.012−0.014-inch Ni-Ti arch wires. We recruited 54 patients, of which 27 received treatment with the new zirconia bracket with multiple slots system (M group), and the others received treatment with standard edge-wise appliances (control group [C group]). We compared the (1) tooth movement rate at the early stage of leveling; (2) changes in the dental arch morphology before and after leveling; and (3) pain caused by orthodontic treatment. Student’st-test was used in all assessments. The tooth movement rate in the maxillomandibular dentition was higher in the M group. The basal arch width, anterior length, and the intercanine width in the maxillary dentition were not significantly different in the two groups; however, the intercanine width in the mandibular dentition was higher in the C group. In assessments of treatment-related pain, the visual analogue pain score was 56.0 mm and 22.6 mm in the C and M groups, respectively. A new zirconia bracket with multiple slots system provided better outcomes with respect to tooth movement rate, treatment period, and postoperative pain, thus indicating its effectiveness over conventional orthodontic systems.

scholarly journals Vibratory stimulation in non-growing patients and its effect on the orthodontic tooth movement

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Tanushree Sharma ◽  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Aseem Sharma ◽  
Pulkit Vaid ◽  
Kamlesh Singh
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vibratory Stimulation ◽  
Movement Rate ◽  
Canine Retraction ◽  
And Control ◽  
Tooth Movement Rate ◽  
The Impact

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Objectives of the study were to determine the impact of vibratory stimulation in non-growing patients on the orthodontic tooth movement rate and to differentiate the orthodontic tooth movement rate in both experimental and control sides.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> 30 non-growing patients were selected for a split-mouth study with fixed appliance therapy orthodontic treatment undergoing bilateral first premolar extractions in maxillary arch. Type 1 active tiebacks were used to perform single canine retraction in all the patients. Vibratory stimulation was provided for 15 minutes daily with the help of Oral-B battery powered toothbrushes of 125 Hz frequency. Measurement was taken with calibrated digital vernier caliper clinically and OPG were taken at regular time intervals using grid method for the tooth movement calculation.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> P value obtained by statistical calculation shows non-significant results in both experimental and control sides in non-growing patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Cyclic loading in non-growing patients with fixed orthodontic appliance shows no change in orthodontic tooth movement in experimental and control group.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document