scholarly journals How does the food environment influence people engaged in weight management? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley L. Neve ◽  
Anna Isaacs
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Food Environment ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Literature ◽  
Environment Influence

scholarly journals Experiences of loneliness: a study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley ◽  
Jenny M. Groarke ◽  
Rhiannon N. Turner ◽  
Keming Yang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Holistic Understanding ◽  
Qualitative Literature

Abstract Background Loneliness is a highly prevalent, harmful, and aversive experience which is fundamentally subjective: social isolation alone cannot account for loneliness, and people can experience loneliness even with ample social connections. A number of studies have qualitatively explored experiences of loneliness; however, the research lacks a comprehensive overview of these experiences. We present a protocol for a study that will, for the first time, systematically review and synthesise the qualitative literature on experiences of loneliness in people of all ages from the general, non-clinical population. The aim is to offer a fine-grained look at experiences of loneliness across the lifespan. Methods We will search multiple electronic databases from their inception onwards: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, CINAHL, and the Education Resource Information Center. Sources of grey literature will also be searched. We will include empirical studies published in English including any qualitative study design (e.g. interview, focus group). Studies should focus on individuals from non-clinical populations of any age who describe experiences of loneliness. All citations, abstracts, and full-text articles will be screened by one author with a second author ensuring consistency regarding inclusion. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Thematic synthesis will be used to synthesise this literature, and study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The planned review will be reported according to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. Discussion The growing body of research on loneliness predictors, outcomes, and interventions must be grounded in an understanding of the lived experience of loneliness. This systematic review and thematic synthesis will clarify how loneliness is subjectively experienced across the lifespan in the general population. This will allow for a more holistic understanding of the lived experience of loneliness which can inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers working in this important area. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020178105.

scholarly journals Stigma-related barriers and facilitators to help seeking for mental health issues in the armed forces: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1880-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Coleman ◽  
S. A. M. Stevelink ◽  
S. L. Hatch ◽  
J. A. Denny ◽  
N. Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Help Seeking ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Mental Health Issues ◽  
Current Systematic Review ◽  
Qualitative Literature

A recent quantitative review in the area of stigma and help seeking in the armed forces has questioned the association between these factors (Sharp et al. 2015). To date, the contribution of qualitative literature in this area has largely been ignored, despite the value this research brings to the understanding of complex social constructs such as stigma. The aim of the current systematic review of qualitative studies was to identify appropriate literature, assess the quality and synthesize findings across studies regarding evidence of stigma-related barriers and facilitators to help seeking for mental health issues within the armed forces. A multi-database text word search incorporating searches of PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Social Policy and Practice, Social Work Abstracts, EMBASE, ERIC and EBM Review databases between 1980 and April 2015 was conducted. Literature was quality assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Thematic synthesis was conducted across the literature. The review identified eight studies with 1012 participants meeting the inclusion criteria. Five overarching themes were identified across the literature: (1) non-disclosure; (2) individual beliefs about mental health; (3) anticipated and personal experience of stigma; (4) career concerns; and (5) factors influencing stigma. The findings from the current systematic review found that unlike inconsistent findings in the quantitative literature, there was substantial evidence of a negative relationship between stigma and help seeking for mental health difficulties within the armed forces. The study advocates for refinement of measures to accurately capture the complexity of stigma and help seeking in future quantitative studies.

scholarly journals Patient barriers and facilitators of colonoscopy use: A rapid systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 106413
Author(s):  
Robert S. Kerrison ◽  
Dahir Sheik-Mohamud ◽  
Emily McBride ◽  
Katriina L. Whitaker ◽  
Colin Rees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Patient Barriers ◽  
Qualitative Literature

Older people's perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (19) ◽  
pp. 1268-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia R Franco ◽  
Allison Tong ◽  
Kirsten Howard ◽  
Catherine Sherrington ◽  
Paulo H Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Literature

scholarly journals Personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health: systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Senneseth ◽  
Charlotte Pollak ◽  
Ragnar Urheim ◽  
Caroline Logan ◽  
Tom Palmstierna
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Forensic Mental Health ◽  
Personal Recovery ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Recovery Processes ◽  
Qualitative Literature

Background There has been a call for a framework to guide recovery-oriented practices in forensic mental health services. Aims This study aims to examine personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health settings in relation to the established framework for personal recovery in mental illness: connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME). Method This study is an updated and expanded systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. A systematic search of six electronic databases (Web of Science, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and SocIndex) was carried out in January 2019, using the terms [Recover*] AND [Forensic OR Secure] AND [Patient* OR Offend* OR Service User*]. Only studies that included service user's own perceptions and were published from 2014 onward were included in the review. Data were examined with thematic synthesis and subsequently analysed in relation to the CHIME framework. Results Twenty-one studies were included in the review. Findings suggest that some adjustments to the original CHIME framework are needed for it to be more relevant to forensic populations, and that an additional recovery process regarding feeling safe and being secure (safety and security) could be added to CHIME, providing the CHIME-Secure framework (CHIME-S). Specific challenges and barriers for forensic recovery were identified and found to represent the opposite of the recovery processes defined by CHIME (e.g. hopelessness). Conclusions We present the CHIME-S as a framework for the personal recovery processes of forensic mental health service users. The CHIME-S may guide the recovery-oriented work of forensic mental health services.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary Communication in the Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i11-i12
Author(s):  
L Gleeson ◽  
G L O’Brien ◽  
D O’Mahony ◽  
S Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Thematic Synthesis ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
Qualitative Literature

Abstract Introduction Communication is widely recognised to play a key role in patient care. The US Institute of Medicine’s 2002 report, ‘Crossing the Quality Chasm’, stated that ‘effective methods of communication, both among caregivers and between caregivers and patients, are critical to providing high-quality care’.(1) Interdisciplinary communication (IDC) can be challenging due to differences in training, education and roles between healthcare professions. Due to the nature of IDC, the majority of research on this subject has been qualitative, exploring the views of healthcare professionals on IPC. To date, however, the qualitative evidence on IDC has not been synthesised in a systematic manner. Therefore, a systematic review of the qualitative literature on healthcare providers’ experiences of interprofessional communication was conducted and registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020177967). Aim The primary aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the qualitative evidence regarding healthcare providers’ perceptions of IDC in the hospital setting. A secondary aim was to identify the barriers and facilitators to IDC in the hospital setting. Methods Studies were eligible for inclusion in the review if they met the following criteria: 1) studies examining healthcare professionals’ experiences of IDC, 2) studies conducted in the hospital setting, and 3) studies conducted using qualitative research methods. Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Embase) were searched from inception until May 2020. Quality appraisal of the identified studies was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative research. Data from the results sections of eligible studies were synthesised using thematic synthesis as described by Thomas and Harden.(2) Thematic synthesis consists of three stages: 1) line-by-line coding of all text relevant labelled ‘results’ or ‘findings’ in the included studies, 2) organisation of codes into descriptive themes that reflect the results of the included studies, and 3) development of descriptive themes into analytical themes that address the review question. Results Eighteen studies were identified as being eligible for inclusion in this review (Figure 1). Five descriptive themes emerged during thematic synthesis: 1) ‘Hierarchy’, 2) ‘Interprofessional Ethos’, 3) ‘Healthcare Environment’, 4) ‘Personal Factors’ and 5) ‘Methods of Communication’, which were developed into two analytical themes: ‘Barriers to IDC’ and ‘Facilitators to IDC’. Personal factors, such as strong interprofessional relationships, were found to facilitate IDC, while organisational factors, such as challenging and hierarchical working environments, were found to pose barriers to IPC. Conclusion We believe that this review makes a significant contribution to the literature. To our knowledge, it is the first study to synthesis the qualitative evidence on healthcare providers’ perceptions of IDC in hospitals. Maintaining an interprofessional ethos and building positive working relationships were identified as facilitators to IDC, while hierarchy and challenging working conditions were identified as barriers. A key finding is the significance that healthcare providers associate with personal aspects of IDC, such as mutual respect and understanding among healthcare professionals. Future research should involve the theory- and evidence-driven design of interventions to improve personal aspects of IDC, such as interprofessional education and engagement. References 1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century - Institute of Medicine. Institute of Medicine. 2001. 2. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(45).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document