From expert to novice: Shocking transitions in nursing

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. e12224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Sellman
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vashti Jude Forbes ◽  
Anna Loomis Jessup
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 386-400
Author(s):  
Shamsi S. Monfared ◽  
Gershon Tenenbaum ◽  
Jonathan R. Folstein ◽  
K. Anders Ericsson

This study examined attention allocation in 30 marksmen categorized into 3 skill levels ranging from expert to novice. Each shooter performed 336 shooting trials. Half of the trials were performed under an occluded-vision condition and the rest under regular, unoccluded conditions. Immediately after completion of a random subset of shots (96 trials), shooters estimated the actual location of each shot, and on a random subset of trials (48 trials), shooters gave retrospective verbal reports. A mixed 3 × 2 factorial analysis of variance revealed that the expert marksmen performed and estimated their shots more accurately than the intermediate and novice marksmen, the intermediates performed like the experts under the full-vision condition and like novices under the occluded-vision condition, and the experts reported attending more to nonvisual information while they estimated their shots than did the novices. The findings advance our understanding of the mechanisms mediating expertise.


2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 428-432
Author(s):  
Heather Sampson ◽  
John Beesley
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 510-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Hatfield
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Wiklund ◽  
Joseph S. Dumas ◽  
Lawrence R. Hoffman

Human factors experimentation facilitated the design of a portable terminal keyboard for combined one-handed and two-handed operation. To ensure a comfortable grip, the terminal had to be made smaller by reducing the size of its keyboard. The product design team needed to know how small the keyboard could be before it degraded the usability of the keyboard and the overall product. The keyboard experiment was designed primarily to determine the effect of both the number of hands used in typing and key spacing on typing speed and accuracy. A total of six commercially available keyboards with key spacings varying from 0.75 to 0.45 inches were tested. Test subjects with typing skills ranging from expert to novice typed separate samples of text on each keyboard, once using one hand and once using two hands. The difference in typing speed between two and one-handed typing averaged 2—1. A key spacing less than about 0.7 inches substantially reduced typing speed but did not increase errors. Poor typists typed at roughly the same speed no matter the key spacing or number of hands used. These findings and additional human factors studies provided parameters for a keyboard smaller than standard size that is expected to allow users to achieve 90 percent of the typing speed possible on a standard size keyboard without decreasing accuracy.


1993 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Khan ◽  
Patricia L. Schmidt ◽  
Rhonda Schoville ◽  
Michael Williams
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 235-237
Author(s):  
BARBARA S. BLAICH
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 288-288
Author(s):  
Ian Costello
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document