Selective Radiofrequency Stimulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) as a Method for Predicting Targets for Neuromodulation in Patients With Post Amputation Pain: A Case Series

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 708-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey W. Hunter ◽  
Ajax Yang ◽  
Tim Davis
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Stimulation Of

Stimulation of Dorsal Root Ganglia for the Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Case Series

Pain Practice ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Van Buyten ◽  
Iris Smet ◽  
Liong Liem ◽  
Marc Russo ◽  
Frank Huygen
Keyword(s):  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglia ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Prospective Case Series ◽  
Stimulation Of

scholarly journals Pulsed Radiofrequency Application at Some Dorsal Root Ganglions Could Cause Drastic Neuromodulation throughout the Whole Body

2017 ◽  
pp. 223-229
Author(s):  
Young-Chang Arai
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Nervous Tissue ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Modified Technique

Background: The modified technique, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) procedure, applied to nervous tissue has been providing anecdotal benefits for the management of chronic and intractable pain conditions. Although PRF has a neuromodulatory effect instead of thermally lesioning nervous tissue, the mechanism underlying the analgesic effect of PRF has not been fully clarified yet. Objectives: To see the changes of electricallyevoked responses of peripheral A-δ and A-β nerve fibers and the analgesic effect induced by PRF. Study Design: Case series. Setting: Inpatient. Methods: This study investigated how dorsal root ganglion (DRG) PRF influenced electricallyevoked responses of peripheral A-δ and A-β nerve fibers at the treated root ganglion dominating areas in five patients with intractable vertebral metastatic pain. Results: DRG PRF provided sound pain relief for patients with intractable vertebral metastatic pain. PRF application at DRGs had a different effect on electrically-evoked responses of peripheral A-δ and A-β nerve fibers at not only the treated root ganglion dominating areas but also the nontreated root ganglion dominating areas far from the treated root ganglion dominating areas in each patient. Limitation: This report is a case series. Conclusions: PRF application at some peripheral nerves could cause drastic neuromodulation throughout the whole body. Key words: Pulsed radiofrequency, dorsal root ganglion block, neuromodulation

THE EFFECT OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A ON CHEMICAL STIMULATION OF RAT DORSAL ROOT GANGLION CELLS

2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 77-77
Author(s):  
W Stuart Reynolds ◽  
Alvaro Lucioni ◽  
David E Rapp ◽  
Gregory T Bales ◽  
Daniel S McGehee
Keyword(s):  
Botulinum Toxin ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Botulinum Toxin A ◽  
Chemical Stimulation ◽  
Toxin A ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion Cells ◽  
Stimulation Of

scholarly journals The Effect of Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment on Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Refractory to Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E97-E103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Cheol Chang
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy ◽  
Radiofrequency Treatment ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Stimulation Of

Background: Patients with lumbosacral radicular pain may complain of persisting pain after monopolar pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment. Objective: We evaluated the effect of bipolar PRF stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain who were unresponsive to both monopolar PRF stimulation of the DRG and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). Study Design: This is a prospective observational study. Setting: The outpatient clinic of a single academic medical center in Korea. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 102 patients who had received monopolar PRF to the DRG for management of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Of these, 32 patients had persistent radicular pain that was scored at least 5 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Twenty-three of them were included in this study and underwent bipolar PRF of the DRG. The outcomes after the procedure were evaluated using the NRS for radicular pain before treatment and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Successful pain relief was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the NRS score compared with the score prior to treatment. Furthermore, at 3 months after treatment, patient satisfaction levels were examined. Patients reporting very good (score = 7) or good results (score = 6) were considered to be satisfied with the procedure. Results: The NRS scores changed significantly over time. At 1, 2, and 3 months after bipolar PRF, the NRS scores were significantly reduced compared with the scores before the treatment. Twelve (52.2%) of the 23 patients reported successful pain relief and were satisfied with treatment results 3 months after bipolar PRF. No serious adverse effects were recorded. Limitations: A small number of patients were recruited and we did not perform long-term follow-up. Conclusion: We believe the use of bipolar PRF of the DRG can be an effective and safe interventional technique for chronic refractory lumbosacral radiculopathy. It appears to be a potential option that can be tried before proceeding to spinal surgery. Key words: Bipolar, pulsed radiofrequency, lumbosacral radicular pain, chronic pain, dorsal root ganglion, spinal stenosis, herniated disc

scholarly journals Comparison of FDA-Approved Electrical Neuromodulation Techniques for Focal Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review of DRG, HF10, and Burst Neuromodulation

2021 ◽  
pp. E407-E423
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Small Sample

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a more effective treatment for focal neuropathic pain (FNP) compared with tonic, paresthesia-based dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). However, new advancements in waveforms for dorsal column SCS have not been thoroughly studied or compared with DRGS for the treatment of FNP. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to examine the evidence for these novel technologies; to highlight the lack of high-quality evidence for the use of neuromodulation to treat FNP syndromes other than complex regional pain syndrome I or II of the lower extremity; to emphasize the absence of comparison studies between DRGS, burst SCS, and high-frequency SCS; and to underscore that consideration of all neuromodulation systems is more patient-centric than a one-size-fits-all approach. STUDY DESIGN: This is a review article summarizing case reports, case series, retrospective studies, prospective studies, and review articles. SETTING: The University of Miami, Florida. METHODS: A literature search was conducted from February to March 2020 using the PubMed and EMBASE databases and keywords related to DRGS, burst SCS, HF10 (high-frequency of 10 kHz), and FNP syndromes. All English-based literature from 2010 reporting clinical data in human patients were included. RESULTS: Data for the treatment of FNP using burst SCS and HF10 SCS are limited (n = 11 for burst SCS and n = 11 for HF10 SCS). The majority of these studies were small, single-center, nonrandomized, noncontrolled, retrospective case series and case reports with short follow-up duration. To date, there are only 2 randomized controlled trials for burst and HF10 for the treatment of FNP. LIMITATIONS: No studies were available comparing DRGS to HF10 or burst for the treatment of FNP. Data for the treatment of FNP using HF10 and burst stimulation were limited to a small sample size reported in mostly case reports and case series. CONCLUSIONS: FNP is a complex disease, and familiarity with all available systems allows the greatest chance of success. KEY WORDS: Dorsal root ganglion, high frequency, burst, spinal cord stimulation, neuromodulation, focal neuropathic pain

scholarly journals A Case Series of Permanent Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

Cureus ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Omosor ◽  
Taejun Lee ◽  
Namath Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Case Series

scholarly journals Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Retrospective Case Series during Four Years follow-up in a Single Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Alfonso Papa ◽  
Elisabetta Saracco ◽  
Maria Teresa Di Dato ◽  
Pietro Buonavolontà ◽  
Anna Maria Salzano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Chronic Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Neuropathic Pain Syndrome

Objectives: The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is involved in the transduction of pain signals to the central nervous system (CNS) and undergoes a number of physiopathological changes during chronic pain. The purpose of this data collection was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of DRG stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain and its impact on functional aspects. Materials and Methods: Forty-four subjects with non-reactive chronic neuropathic pain syndrome were implanted with DRG stimulation. Patients were evaluated at baseline as well as at 15, and 30 days, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after medical intervention/surgery using the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), which measures pain intensity, and the Oswestry Scale, for the estimation of disability (ODI). Results: After four years of simulation, VAS and ODI showed a statistically significant reduction throughout the follow-up period. The average pain relief obtained after 48 months of treatment was 74.1% ± 3.4. Conclusion: The results of this data collection demonstrate the feasibility of DRG stimulation, the correspondence between the clinical indications at the DRG implant and what is commonly found in the literature on this technique.(18,20) Patients defined as clinical responders to DRG stimulation and so implanted with definitive IPG showed a sustained and long term efficacy. Eight patients had previously been implanted with a traditional SCS without any clinically relevant efficacy; they were then explained for unsatisfactory results. Six of them (75%) were later implanted with DRG, with long-term effectiveness. Another advantage of this therapy is the absence of positional effects and lead migration. The adverse events proved to be independent of the anatomical level of insertion; moreover, this series of cases show a lower incidence of lead migration than reported in the literature. In summary, DRGs have been ignored for too long, probably due to the technical difficulty of reaching their deep, almost extra-spinal anatomical position.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document