Integrative Health Care in Israel and Traditional Arab Herbal Medicine: When Health Care Interfaces with Culture and Politics

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 368-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Keshet ◽  
Ariela Popper-Giveon
EXPLORE ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-309
Author(s):  
Mary Jo Kreitzer ◽  
Victor S. Sierpina

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruiping Fan

It is generally recognized that China, while attempting to develop modern scientific medicine in carrying out its national policy for modernization, has also made significant efforts to integrate traditional Chinese medicine into its health care system. For instance, the World Health Organization's first global strategy on traditional and alternative medicine (released in May 2002) lists China as one of only four of its member states to have attained an integrative health care system. However, medical integration can take many different forms and involve quite different health care standards. A health care standard is a set of mechanisms by which distinct diagnostic and therapeutic practices and products are validated or accredited for use in health care delivery. Traditional Chinese medicine and modern scientific medicine adopt different sets of such mechanisms and thereby engage different health care standards. Accordingly, in appraising the Chinese integrative health care system, it is important to investigate which health care standard has been appealed to.


Author(s):  
Jean-Lionel Bagot ◽  
Ingrid Theunissen ◽  
Jean-Loup Mouysset ◽  
Jean-Philippe Wagner ◽  
Nicolas Magné ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 216495612097397
Author(s):  
Ariana Thompson-Lastad ◽  
Paula Gardiner

There is strong evidence for clinical benefits of group medical visits (GMVs) (also known as shared medical appointments) for prenatal care, diabetes, chronic pain, and a wide range of other conditions. GMVs can increase access to integrative care while providing additional benefits including increased clinician-patient contact time, cost savings, and support with prevention and self-management of chronic conditions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many clinical sites are experimenting with new models of care delivery including virtual GMVs using telehealth. Little research has focused on which clinicians offer this type of care, how the GMV approach affects the ways they practice, and their job satisfaction. Workplace-based interventions have been shown to decrease burnout in individual physicians. We argue that more research is needed to understand if GMVs should be considered among these workplace-based interventions, given their potential benefits to clinician wellbeing. GMVs can benefit clinician wellbeing in multiple ways, including: (1) Extended time with patients; (2) Increased ability to provide team-based care; (3) Understanding patients’ social context and addressing social determinants of health. GMVs can be implemented in a variety of settings in many different ways depending on institutional context, patient needs and clinician preferences. We suggest that GMV programs with adequate institutional support may be beneficial for preventing burnout and improving retention among clinicians and health care teams more broadly, including in integrative health care. Just as group support benefits patients struggling with loneliness and social isolation, GMVs can help address these and other concerns in overwhelmed clinicians.


2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Boon ◽  
Marja Verhoef ◽  
Dennis O'Hara ◽  
Barb Findlay

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0122125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Andermo ◽  
Tobias Sundberg ◽  
Christina Forsberg ◽  
Torkel Falkenberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document