Acute sleep deprivation elevates brain and body temperature in rats

Author(s):  
Lal Chandra Vishwakarma ◽  
Binney Sharma ◽  
Vishwajeet Singh ◽  
Ashok Kumar Jaryal ◽  
Hruda Nanda Mallick
SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Guisle ◽  
Maud Gratuze ◽  
Séréna Petry ◽  
Françoise Morin ◽  
Rémi Keraudren ◽  
...  

Abstract Study Objectives Aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau protein are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other tauopathies. Sleep disturbances are common in AD patients, and insufficient sleep may be a risk factor for AD. Recent evidence suggests that tau phosphorylation is dysregulated by sleep disturbances in mice. However, the physiological regulation of tau phosphorylation during the sleep–wake cycle is currently unknown. We thus aimed to determine whether tau phosphorylation is regulated by circadian rhythms, inherently linked to the sleep–wake cycle. Methods To answer these questions, we analyzed by Western blotting tau protein and associated kinases and phosphatases in the brains of awake, sleeping, and sleep-deprived B6 mice. We also recorded their temperature. Results We found that tau phosphorylation undergoes sleep-driven circadian variations as it is hyperphosphorylated during sleep but not during acute sleep deprivation. Moreover, we demonstrate that the mechanism behind these changes involves temperature, as tau phosphorylation was inversely correlated with circadian- and sleep deprivation-induced variations in body temperature, and prevented by housing the animals at a warmer temperature. Notably, similar changes in tau phosphorylation were reproduced in neuronal cells exposed to temperatures recorded during the sleep–wake cycle. Our results also suggest that inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) may explain the hyperphosphorylation of tau during sleep-induced hypothermia. Conclusion Taken together, our results demonstrate that tau phosphorylation follows a circadian rhythm driven mostly by body temperature and sleep, and provide the physiological basis for further understanding how sleep deregulation can affect tau and ultimately AD pathology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 96-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Lima Giacobbo ◽  
Márcio Silveira Corrêa ◽  
Kelem Vedovelli ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Bruhn de Souza ◽  
Letícia Martins Spitza ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 113545
Author(s):  
Xintong Lyu ◽  
Guohua Wang ◽  
Zhuang Pi ◽  
Lan Wu

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 73a
Author(s):  
Terence L. Tyson ◽  
Nathan H. Feick ◽  
Patrick F. Cravalho ◽  
Erin E. Flynn-Evans ◽  
Leland S. Stone

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A46-A46
Author(s):  
Anna Marie Nguyen ◽  
Rebecca Campbell ◽  
Abigail Vance ◽  
Ellen Leen-Feldner

Abstract Introduction Recent literature highlights the need to focus on the impact of intrusive symptoms as a possible risk factor for the development and maintenance of PTSD. Cognitive and sleep models also contribute to the further understanding of intrusive symptoms. Further emotion work emphasizes that disgust is an emotion closely associated with the emergence of posttraumatic stress symptomology following traumatic events. Methods This study utilized a film eliciting disgust to examine the effects of acute sleep deprivation on the intensity of intrusive symptoms and emotion reactivity. Forty-nine college students were randomly assigned to sleep as usual or an acute sleep deprivation after watching a disturbing film. It was hypothesized that, relative to the control group, participants who were acutely sleep deprived would report higher frequency of intrusive symptoms and higher negative valence. Results Findings were partially consistent with hypotheses. There were no group or interaction effects on intrusive symptoms, although participants across both groups reported significant decreases in negative valence and intrusive symptoms across the study (F(1, 47) = 10.30, p < 0.01). There was a significant interaction effect between sleep group and self-reported negative valence, where individuals in the sleep deprived group reported significantly higher valence than individuals in the control group, despite significant decreases in negative valence over time (F(1, 48) = 7.869, p < 0.01). Conclusion Possible mechanisms that may contribute to the significant difference in valence may be due to higher order emotion regulation strategies that are compromised due to sleep loss. However, the significant decreases in negative valence and intrusive symptoms over time may be due to methodological factors or the type of sleep manipulation. Further work can address these challenges by using a larger sample size or examining the effects of chronic, partial sleep deprivation. Support (if any):


Author(s):  
Courtney E. Casale ◽  
Tess E. Brieva ◽  
Erika M. Yamazaki ◽  
Caroline A. Antler ◽  
Namni Goel

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 383-391
Author(s):  
Isa Tuncay Batuk ◽  
Merve Ozbal Batuk ◽  
Songul Aksoy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Few studies have suggested a relationship between vestibular system and sleep deprivation. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of acute sleep deprivation lasting 24 hours or more on the postural balance and the visual abilities related to the vestibular system in healthy young adults. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy young adults (8 males, 23 female; ages 18– 36 years) who had experienced at least 24 hours of sleep deprivation were included in the study. Subjects made two visits to the test laboratory. One visit was scheduled during a sleep deprivation (SD) condition, and the other was scheduled during a daily life (DL) condition. Five tests— the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Static Visual Acuity Test (SVA), Minimum Perception Time Test (mPT), Dynamic Visual Acuity Test (DVA), and Gaze Stabilization Test (GST)— were performed using a Computerized Dynamic Posturography System. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between SD and DL measurements in somatosensorial (p = 0.003), visual (p = 0.037), vestibular (p = 0.008) ratios, and composite scores (p = 0.001) in SOT. The mPT results showed a statistically significant difference between SD and DL conditions (p = 0.001). No significant difference was found between SD and DL conditions in the comparison of the mean SVA (p = 0.466), DVA (p = 0.192), and GST head velocity values (p = 0.160). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep deprivation has a considerable impact on the vestibular system and visual perception time in young adults. Increased risk of accidents and performance loss after SD were thought to be due to the postural control and visual processing parameters rather than dynamic visual parameters of the vestibular system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document