scholarly journals Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill full term neonates: A systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 49-49 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Term Neonates

The Hemodynamically Significant Ductus Arteriosus in Critically Ill Full-Term Neonates

Neonatology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linh G. Ly ◽  
Judith Hawes ◽  
Hilary E. Whyte ◽  
Lilian S. Teixeira ◽  
Patrick J. McNamara
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Ductus Arteriosus ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Term Neonates

Blood pressure in non-critically ill preterm and full-term neonates

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bijana Pejovic ◽  
Amira Peco-Antic ◽  
Jelena Marinkovic-Eric
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Term Neonates

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of olfactive stimulation interventions to manage procedural pain in preterm and full-term neonates

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 103697
Author(s):  
Gwenaëlle De Clifford-Faugere ◽  
Andréane Lavallée ◽  
Christelle Khadra ◽  
Ariane Ballard ◽  
Sébastien Colson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Term Neonates

scholarly journals Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2968
Author(s):  
Dalal J. Alsharif ◽  
Farah J. Alsharif ◽  
Ghadeer S. Aljuraiban ◽  
Mahmoud M. A. Abulmeaty
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Enteral nutrition (EN) is considered the first feeding route for critically ill patients. However, adverse effects such as gastrointestinal complications limit its optimal provision, leading to inadequate energy and protein intake. We compared the clinical outcomes of supplemental parenteral nutrition added to EN (SPN + EN) and EN alone in critically ill adults. Electronic databases restricted to full-text randomized controlled trials available in the English language and published from January 1990 to January 2019 were searched. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and the meta-analysis was conducted using the MedCalc software. A total of five studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared to EN alone, SPN + EN decreased the risk of nosocomial infections (relative risk (RR) = 0.733, p = 0.032) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR = 0.569, p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed between SPN + EN and EN in the length of hospital stay, hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In conclusion, when enteral feeding fails to fulfill the energy requirements in critically ill adult patients, SPN may be beneficial as it helps in decreasing nosocomial infections and ICU mortality, in addition to increasing energy and protein intakes with no negative effects on other clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document