Prospective study of bidet toilet use: Association of abnormal vaginal colonization and preterm birth in high‐risk pregnant women

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1134-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoo‐Min Kim ◽  
Ji Y. Kim ◽  
Mi‐Young Lee ◽  
Suk‐Joo Choi ◽  
Soo‐young Oh ◽  
...  
Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enav Yefet ◽  
Raul Colodner ◽  
Merav Strauss ◽  
Yifat Gam Ze Letova ◽  
Zohar Nachum

Lactobacilli administration has been suggested for the treatment and prevention of bacterial vaginosis, which increases the risk for preterm birth. We aimed to evaluate the vaginal colonization of lactobacilli orally administered to pregnant women at risk for preterm birth. We performed a randomized and controlled crossover study between January 2016 and May 2017. Forty pregnant women at high risk for preterm birth with normal vaginal flora (Nugent score ≤ 3) were randomized to either receive two oral capsules/day each containing 5 × 109 Lactobacilli (L.) rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 (n = 20) or no treatment (n = 20) for 2 months. Treatments were then crossed over for an additional two months. A vaginal examination and swabbing were performed for assessment of bacterial vaginosis at baseline and every month until study completion. At the same time points, vaginal samples were cultured and subjected to matrix-assisted-laser-desorption/ionization-time-of-flight-mass-spectrometry (MALDI TOF-MS) for the detection of the specific bacterial strains contained in the capsules. The primary endpoint was the presence of the administered lactobacilli strains in the vagina during the first two months of follow-up. Thirty-eight women completed the study. During the first two months of treatment, L. rhamnosus GR-1 was detected in one (5%) woman on the probiotic treatment and 2 (11%) women receiving no treatment (p = 0.6). L. rhamnosus GR-1 was detected in vaginal samples of 4 (11%) women during probiotic treatment (of both groups) and L. reuteri RC-14 was not detected in any samples. The rest of the endpoints were not different between the groups. Altogether, vaginal colonization of lactobacilli following oral administration is low during pregnancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. S258
Author(s):  
Courtney Olson-Chen ◽  
Kam Szlachetka ◽  
Dzhamala Gilmandyar ◽  
Erica Faske ◽  
Elizabeth Fountaine ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8_2020 ◽  
pp. 82-87
Author(s):  
Khodzhaeva Z.S. Khodzhaeva ◽  
Gorina K.A. Gorina ◽  
Muminova K.T. Muminova ◽  
Ivanets T.Yu. Ivanets ◽  
Kessler Yu.V. Kessler ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 307 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Auray-Blais ◽  
Evelyne Raiche ◽  
René Gagnon ◽  
Maryse Berthiaume ◽  
Jean-Charles Pasquier

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarahn M. Wheeler ◽  
Kelley E. C. Massengale ◽  
Konyin Adewumi ◽  
Thelma A. Fitzgerald ◽  
Carrie B. Dombeck ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pregnant women with a history of preterm birth are at risk for recurrence, often requiring frequent prenatal visits for close monitoring and/or preventive therapies. Employment demands can limit uptake and adherence to recommended monitoring and preterm birth prevention therapies. Method: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) of pregnant women with a history of preterm birth. IDIs were conducted by trained qualitative interviewers following a semi-structured interview guide focused on uncovering barriers and facilitators to initiation of prenatal care, including relevant employment experiences, and soliciting potential interventions to improve prompt prenatal care initiation. The IDIs were analyzed via applied thematic analysis. Results: We described the interview findings that address women’s employment experiences. The current analysis includes 27 women who are majority self-described as non-Hispanic Black (74%) and publically insured (70%). Participants were employed in a range of professions; food services, childcare and retail were the most common occupations. Participants described multiple ways that being pregnant impacted their earning potential, ranging from voluntary work-hour reduction, involuntary duty hour reductions by employers, truncated promotions, and termination of employment. Participants also shared varying experiences with workplace accommodations to their work environment and job duties based on their pregnancy. Some of these accommodations were initiated by a collaborative employee/employer discussion, others were initiated by the employer’s perception of safe working conditions in pregnancy, and some accommodations were based on medical recommendations. Participants described supportive and unsupportive employer reactions to requests for accommodations. Conclusions: Our findings provide novel insights into women’s experiences balancing a pregnancy at increased risk for preterm birth with employment obligations. While many women reported positive experiences, the most striking insights came from women who described negative situations that ranged from challenging to potentially unlawful. Many of the findings suggest profound misunderstandings likely exist at the patient, employer and clinical provider level about the laws surrounding employment in pregnancy, safe employment responsibilities during pregnancy, and the range of creative accommodations that often allow for continued workplace productivity even during high risk pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document