The Patient as Consumer: Empowerment or Commodification? Currents in Contemporary Bioethics

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Goldstein ◽  
Daniel G. Bowers

Language matters. Thus when market language is imposed on the health care system, it seems natural to transform patients into consumers, and patient rights into consumer rights. But patients are not consumers who pick and choose among physicians and treatments on the basis of price and quality. Patients are sick and vulnerable people who are truly not themselves and are incapable of shopping around for the best deal.Discussions surrounding patient engagement and empowerment often appear to use the terms “patient” and “consumer” interchangeably. But do the two terms hold the same meaning, or is a “patient” a passive actor in the health care arena and a “consumer” an informed, rational decision-maker? Has there been a shift in our usage of the two terms that aligns with the increasing commercialization of health care in the U.S.

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
KEVIN GRUMBACH ◽  
ROBERT MOFFIT

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
KEVIN GRUMBACH ◽  
ROBERT MOFFIT

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
KEVIN GRUMBACH ◽  
ROBERT MOFFIT

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 387-402
Author(s):  
Arti K. Rai

Over the last few decades, the U.S. health care system has been the beneficiary of tremendous growth in the power and sheer quantity of useful medical technology. As a consequence, our society has, for some time, had to make cost-benefit tradeoffs in health care. The alternative—funding all health care interventions that would produce some health benefit for some patient—is not feasible, because it would effectively consume all of our resources.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon C. Schommer ◽  
Caroline A. Gaither ◽  
William R. Doucette ◽  
David H. Kreling ◽  
David A. Mott

Type: Original Research


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document