Progression of Physical Frailty and the Risk of All‐Cause Mortality: Is There a Point of No Return?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian‐Li Xue ◽  
Karen Bandeen‐Roche ◽  
Jing Tian ◽  
Judith D. Kasper ◽  
Linda P. Fried
Keyword(s):  
Physical Frailty ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Point Of No Return

Physical Frailty, Multimorbidity, and All-Cause Mortality in an Older Population From Southern Italy: Results from the Salus in Apulia Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-605
Author(s):  
Fabio Castellana ◽  
Luisa Lampignano ◽  
Ilaria Bortone ◽  
Roberta Zupo ◽  
Madia Lozupone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern Italy ◽  
Physical Frailty ◽  
Older Population ◽  
All Cause Mortality

scholarly journals Effect of social support on all-cause mortality risk in physical frailty Japanese elderly

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (0) ◽  
pp. PR-004-PR-004
Author(s):  
Chikako Tange ◽  
Yukiko Nishita ◽  
Makiko Tomida ◽  
Takeshi Nakagawa ◽  
Rei Otsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Physical Frailty ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Japanese Elderly

A Longitudinal Study on the Association of Interrelated Factors Among Frailty Dimensions, Cognitive Domains, Cognitive Frailty, and All-Cause Mortality

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jen-Hau Chen ◽  
Hua-San Shih ◽  
Jennifer Tu ◽  
Jeng-Min Chiou ◽  
Shu-Hui Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Physical Frailty ◽  
Cognitive Frailty ◽  
Cognitive Domains ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Models ◽  
Global Cognition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Over Time

Background: Cognitive frailty integrating impaired cognitive domains and frailty dimensions has not been explored. Objective: This study aimed to explore 1) associations among frailty dimensions and cognitive domains over time and 2) the extended definitions of cognitive frailty for predicting all-cause mortality. Methods: This four-year cohort study recruited 521 older adults at baseline (2011–2013). We utilized 1) generalized linear mixed models exploring associations of frailty dimensions (physical dimension: modified from Fried et al.; psychosocial dimension: integrating self-rated health, mood, and social relationship and support; global frailty: combining physical and psychosocial frailty) with cognition (global and domain-specific) over time and 2) time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models assessing associations between extended definitions of cognitive frailty (cognitive domains-frailty dimensions) and all-cause mortality. Results: At baseline, the prevalence was 3.0%for physical frailty and 37.6%for psychosocial frailty. Greater physical frailty was associated with poor global cognition (adjusted odds ratio = 1.43–3.29, β: –1.07), logical memory (β: –0.14 to –0.10), and executive function (β: –0.51 to –0.12). Greater psychosocial frailty was associated with poor global cognition (β: –0.44) and attention (β: –0.15 to –0.13). Three newly proposed definitions of cognitive frailty, “mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-psychosocial frailty,” “MCI-global frailty,” and “impaired verbal fluency-global frailty,” outperformed traditional cognitive frailty for predicting all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.49, 6.83, 3.29 versus 4.87; AIC = 224.3, 221.8, 226.1 versus 228.1). Conclusion: Notably, extended definitions of cognitive frailty proposed by this study better predict all-cause mortality in older adults than the traditional definition of cognitive frailty, highlighting the importance of psychosocial frailty to reduce mortality in older adults.

486 Clinical composite endpoint classification of REVIVE II corresponds to all-cause mortality risk

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-107
Author(s):  
J TEERLINK ◽  
L DELGADOHERRERA ◽  
R THAKKAR ◽  
B HUANG ◽  
R PADLEY
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
All Cause Mortality
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document