Effect of self-performed mechanical plaque control frequency on gingival inflammation revisited: a randomized clinical trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Camponogara de Freitas ◽  
Tatiana Militz Perrone Pinto ◽  
Alessandra Pascotini Grellmann ◽  
Danilo Antonio Milbradt Dutra ◽  
Cristiano Susin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Gingival Inflammation ◽  
Control Frequency ◽  
Plaque Control

Effect of self‐performed mechanical plaque control frequency on gingival health in subjects with a history of periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 834-841
Author(s):  
Juliana Maier ◽  
Ana Paula Pereira Reiniger ◽  
Camila Silveira Sfreddo ◽  
Ulf ME Wikesjö ◽  
Karla Zanini Kantorski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Control Frequency ◽  
Gingival Health ◽  
History Of ◽  
Plaque Control

The Effect of the Bass Intrasulcular Toothbrushing Technique on the Reduction of Gingival Inflammation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Ausenda ◽  
Natalie Jeong ◽  
Peter Arsenault ◽  
Robert Gyurko ◽  
Matthew Finkelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Gingival Inflammation ◽  
Toothbrushing Technique

Frequency of mechanical removal of plaque as it relates to gingival inflammation: a randomized clinical trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 948-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana M. P. Pinto ◽  
Guilherme C. de Freitas ◽  
Danilo A. Dutra ◽  
Karla Z. Kantorski ◽  
Carlos H. Moreira
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Gingival Inflammation ◽  
Mechanical Removal

Effectiveness of a miswak extract-containing toothpaste on gingival inflammation: a randomized clinical trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Azaripour ◽  
B Mahmoodi ◽  
E Habibi ◽  
I Willershausen ◽  
I Schmidtmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Gingival Inflammation

Evaluation of periodontal indices in young adults submitted to chlorhexidine 0.12% mouthwash: a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathale Cruz BATISTA ◽  
Camila Possal de PAULA ◽  
Isis Andréa Venturini Pola POIATE ◽  
Edgard POIATE JUNIOR ◽  
Elizangela Cruvinel ZUZA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Gingival Inflammation ◽  
Inflammatory Agent ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Periodontal Indices

Abstract Introduction Gingivitis is a gingival inflammation which can often be treated with oral hygiene such as brushing, flossing, and an antiseptic mouthwash. Objective The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) solution as an anti-inflammatory agent and for reducing the presence of plaque and inflammation in young adults. Material and method Thirty patients with gingivitis aged 18 to 30 years with a probing depth ≤ 3 mm and a minimum of 20 teeth in the whole mouth were selected and evaluated at baseline and 30 days after treatment. Periodontal clinical parameters were verified: plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), Simplified Debris Index (DI-S), and Simplified Calculus Index (CI-S) Patients were then randomly allocated into two groups: CHX Group, received chlorhexidine 0.12% labeled as solution 1, and Placebo Group, received saline solution labeled as solution 2. Both groups were included in a hygiene program and received mouthwash. Result Statistically significant differences between CHX and Placebo groups were observed for the variables PI, GI, DI-S, CI-S, and OHI-S (p<0.05 - Paired T Test) after 30 days. The CHX group presented improved GI compared to Placebo at 30 days. Chlorhexidine 0.12% was efficient in the control of periodontium inflammation. Conclusion It can be concluded that chlorhexidine as a mouthwash is efficient in improving periodontal indices in young adults, but it is still controversial whether age can influence GI and OHI-S.

Effect on plaque control in children patients with Down syndrome using Digital Brush with or without chlorhexidine: a randomized clinical trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Stefanini ◽  
Matteo Sangiorgi ◽  
Marisa Roncati ◽  
Giovanni D'Alessandro ◽  
Gabriela Piana
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Plaque Control

scholarly journals A Randomized Clinical Trial ofSchinus terebinthifoliusMouthwash to Treat Biofilm-Induced Gingivitis

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irlan de Almeida Freires ◽  
Livia Araújo Alves ◽  
Gabriela Lacet Silva Ferreira ◽  
Vanessa de Carvalho Jovito ◽  
Ricardo Dias de Castro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Gingival Inflammation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Gingival Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intervention Protocol ◽  
And Control

Objectives. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of aSchinus terebinthifolius(ST) mouthwash in reducing gingival inflammation levels (GI) and biofilm accumulation (BA) in children with gingivitis.Methods. This was a randomized, controlled, triple blind, and phase II clinical trial, with children aged 9–13 years presenting with biofilm-induced gingivitis. The sample was randomized into experimental (0.3125% ST, ) and control (0.12% chlorhexidine/CHX, ) groups. Products were masked as regards color, flavor and aroma. Intervention protocol consisted in supervised rinsing of 10 mL/day for 01 minute for 10 days. Gingival bleeding and simplified oral hygiene indexes were used to assess the efficacy variables, measured at baseline and after intervention by calibrated examiners. Data were statistically treated with pairedt-test, unpairedt-test, and Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests (α= .05).Results. It was found that both ST and CHX were able to significantly reduce GI levels after 10 days and there was no significant difference between them . CHX was the only product able to significantly reduce BA after 10 days when compared to baseline .Conclusion. ST mouthwash showed significant anti-inflammatory activity (equivalent to CHX), but it was not able to reduce biofilm accumulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document