scholarly journals An introduction: “Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and Domestic Politics: Policy Coordination in the EU from the European Semester to the Covid‐19 Crisis”*

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie D'Erman ◽  
Amy Verdun
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Politics ◽  
Macroeconomic Policy ◽  
Policy Coordination ◽  
The Eu

The Changing Nature of Irish International Development Policy

2021 ◽  
pp. 176-194
Author(s):  
Paul Walsh ◽  
Ciara Whelan
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Development Policy ◽  
Domestic Politics ◽  
Development Aid ◽  
Policy Framework ◽  
Foreign Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Development Policy ◽  
International Commitments ◽  
National Economic ◽  
The Eu

Ireland’s involvement in international development has become a significant aspect of its foreign economic policy. Its engagement has moved from priorities that were largely domestically determined in the early 1970s and based on bilateral relationships between Ireland as donor and the recipient programme countries, toward priorities and involvements within a multilateral policy framework. This has come about through Ireland’s increasing engagement with international organizations, particularly the UN and the EU. However as the boundaries blur between Overseas Development Aid (ODA) policy and shared global goals, such as addressing climate breakdown and mitigating the scale of international distributive inequality, this can lead to tensions within countries about the implications of international commitments for the priorities at play in domestic politics. This is evident where Ireland’s ODA-driven commitments in the international field are in tension with domestic policy priorities, but also where tension arises in the area of national economic development policy.

scholarly journals Territorial cohesion through cross-border landscape policy? The European case of the Three Countries Park (BE-NL-DE)

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Brüll ◽  
Timo Matti Wirth ◽  
Frank Lohrberg ◽  
Annet Kempenaar ◽  
Marlies Brinkhuijsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Green Infrastructure ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Landscape Management ◽  
Policy Coordination ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Adaptive Landscape ◽  
Vital Functions ◽  
Constant Change ◽  
Territorial Cohesion ◽  
The Eu

AbstractLandscapes can be understood as socialecological systems under constant change. In Europe various territorial dynamics pose persistent challenges to maintaining diverse landscapes both as European heritage and in their capacity to provide vital functions and services. Concurrently, under the competence of cohesion policy, the EU is attempting to improve policy making by better policy coordination and respecting regional specifics. This paper explores the question how a policy dedicated to landscape can help to handle territorial change and support territorial cohesion. It presents results and performances of the ESPON applied research study LP3LP: (1) a common landscape policy for the Three Countries Park, across the Dutch, German and Belgium borders, including a spatial landscape vision, a governance proposal of adaptive landscape management, and thematic strategies dealing with green infrastructure, cultural heritage, complementary biomass and quality production; (2) recommendations at the EU level. In discussing the significance of a landscape approach for EU policy,three dimensions of landscape are linked withimportant aspects of territorial cohesion: ‘landscape as asset’ addressing natural-cultural territorial capital as an indigenous base forsmart, sustainable, and inclusivedevelopment;‘landscape as place’ stressing the relevance of landscape for place-based policies; and ‘landscape as common ground’ highlighting its potential for horizontal, vertical, and territorial integration.

Central and Eastern Europe: The New Core or the Periphery of Europe?

2020 ◽  
pp. 162-181
Author(s):  
Ireneusz Paweł Karolewski
Keyword(s):  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Central And Eastern Europe ◽  
Domestic Politics ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
Refugee Crisis ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Policy Fields ◽  
Visegrad Group ◽  
The Eu

This chapter focuses on Central and Eastern European (CEE) member states of the EU, and how they positioned themselves in the new constellation of conflicts within the EU in the aftermath of the multiple crisis. It deals mainly with the Visegrad Group (V4) and explores its ‘repositioning’ in regard to two crisis-ridden policy fields of the EU: controversies about the rule of law and the refugee crisis. With regard to the former issue, the chapter discusses Poland as the most prominent case among the CEE countries. Against this background, it highlights two specific aspects of domestic politics: the memory games that the V4 countries play with their past and the Euroscepticism of government circles as well as a broader public.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document