Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 435-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gielen ◽  
B. De Wever
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Peer Feedback ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Multilevel Approach ◽  
Feedback Quality ◽  
Product Improvement ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meskuere Capan Melser ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Andjela Bäwert ◽  
Claudia Puttinger ◽  
Anita Holzinger
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Passive Learning ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Alternative assessments engage students in the assessment process to improve both short- and long-term outcomes by developing their judgments and responsibility about their own learning, and that of their peers. In this study, we investigated students’ perception towards self- and peer-assessment, their objectivity and impact on students’ learning. Methods The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of second year undergraduate medical students towards self- and peer-assessment, and their objectivity, appropriateness, and the impact of these assessments on students’ learning activities, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire. Results 423 students participated in this study. Self-assessment was found more appropriate method to assess students’ knowledge. Most of students agreed that peer-assessment is not objective (M= -0.07). Majority of students evaluated that peer assessment has no or little impact on their active and passive learning (M= -0.23, -0.35), on the other hand self-assessment was reported as a helpful tool for gaining long-term knowledge (M= 0.13) and following the content of courses (M= 0.16). Conclusion Based on our results, students’ perspective on peer assessment were negative, on the whole, students had positive attitudes towards self-assessment and negative attitudes towards peer-assessment. This study also determined that self-assessment leads to the promotion of students’ learning.

scholarly journals Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meskuere Capan Melser ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Andjela Bäwert ◽  
Claudia Puttinger ◽  
Anita Holzinger
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Passive Learning ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Alternative assessments engage students in the assessment process to improve both short- and long-term outcomes by developing their judgments and responsibility about their own learning, and that of their peers. In this study, we investigated students’ perception towards self- and peer-assessment, their objectivity and impact on students’ learning. Methods: The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of second year undergraduate medical students towards self- and peer-assessment, and their objectivity, appropriateness, and the impact of these assessments on students’ learning activities, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire. Results: 423 students participated in this study. Self-assessment was found more appropriate method to assess students’ knowledge. Most of students agreed that peer-assessment is not objective (M= -0.07). Majority of students evaluated that peer assessment has no or little impact on their active and passive learning (M= -0.23, -0.35), on the other hand self-assessment was reported as a helpful tool for gaining long-term knowledge (M= 0.13) and following the content of courses (M= 0.16). Conclusion: Based on our results, students’ perspective on peer assessment were negative, on the whole, students had positive attitudes towards self-assessment and negative attitudes towards peer-assessment. This study also determined that self-assessment leads to the promotion of students’ learning.

The Impact of Rubric-Based Peer Assessment on Feedback Quality in Blended MOOCs

2016 ◽  
pp. 462-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef ◽  
Usman Wahid ◽  
Mohamed Amine Chatti ◽  
Ulrik Schroeder ◽  
Marold Wosnitza
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Feedback Quality ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meskuere Capan Melser ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Andjela Bäwert ◽  
Claudia Puttinger ◽  
Anita Holzinger
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Passive Learning ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Alternative assessments engage students in the assessment process to improve both short- and long-term outcomes by developing their judgments and responsibility about their own learning, and that of their peers. In this study, we investigated students’ perception towards self- and peer-assessment, their objectivity and impact on students’ learning. Methods: The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of second year undergraduate medical students towards self- and peer-assessment, and their objectivity, appropriateness, and the impact of these assessments on students’ learning activities, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire. Results: 423 students participated in this study. Self-assessment was found more appropriate method to assess students’ knowledge. Most of students agreed that peer-assessment is not objective (M= -0.07). Majority of students evaluated that peer assessment has no or little impact on their active and passive learning (M= -0.23, -0.35), on the other hand self-assessment was reported as a helpful tool for gaining long-term knowledge (M= 0.13) and following the content of courses (M= 0.16). Conclusion: Based on our results, students’ perspective on peer assessment were negative, on the whole, students had positive attitudes towards self-assessment and negative attitudes towards peer-assessment. This study also determined that self-assessment leads to the promotion of students’ learning.

scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF PEER ASSESSMENT ON STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Nur Laili Indasari ◽  
Oikurema Purwati ◽  
Syafiul Anam
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
University Students ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Students First ◽  
The University ◽  
Giving Feedback ◽  
The Impact

Peer Assessment is one of the alternative methods to enhance the students’ motivation and ability in writing. Providing feedback is the goal of peer assessment. It is not an easy task as it is required an ability to deliver the feedback critically and competence to master the knowledge of writing. Therefore, the present study is going to explore the impact of giving feedback in the peer assessment process on students’ recount text and to acknowledge the students’ challenges while giving and receiving feedback in that process. Qualitative study assisted the researcher to get the data. The university students in the second semester became the subjects of the study. Documents and interviews were techniques to collect the data. The results revealed that the students’ first draft and the last draft of recount text got improvements mainly on the aspect of grammar. Meanwhile, most students’ challenges while giving and receiving feedback in the process of peer assessment were the aspect of psychology and the knowledge of grammar. In conclusion, the process of peer assessment which involves giving and receiving feedback provides a positive impact on the students’ recount text and the challenges which are faced by the students can be used as inputs for the lecturer in teaching.

scholarly journals Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meskuere Capan Melser ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Andjela Bäwert ◽  
Claudia Puttinger ◽  
Anita Holzinger
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Passive Learning ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Alternative assessments engage students in the assessment process to improve both short- and long-term outcomes by developing their judgments and responsibility about their own learning, and that of their peers. In this study, we investigated students’ perception towards self- and peer-assessment, their objectivity and impact on students’ learning. Methods The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of second year undergraduate medical students towards self- and peer-assessment, and their objectivity, appropriateness, and the impact of these assessments on students’ learning activities, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire. Results Four hundred twenty-three students participated in this study. Self-assessment was found more appropriate method to assess students’ knowledge. Most of students agreed that peer-assessment is not objective (M = − 0.07). Majority of students evaluated that peer assessment has no or little impact on their active and passive learning (M = − 0.23, − 0.35), on the other hand self-assessment was reported as a helpful tool for gaining long-term knowledge (M = 0.13) and following the content of courses (M = 0.16). Conclusion Based on our results, students’ perspective on peer assessment were negative, on the whole, students had positive attitudes towards self-assessment and negative attitudes towards peer-assessment. This study also determined that self-assessment leads to the promotion of students’ learning.

Developing enterprise skills through peer-assessed pitch presentations

2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Faherty
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Creative Industries ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Traditional Assessment ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
Enterprise Education ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of using summative peer assessment to develop enterprise skills within higher education. Design/methodology/approach – An empirical investigation analysing students own perceptions of the peer assessment process to evaluate its impact. Findings – Participating students indicate that peer assessment aided the achievement of an enterprise learning outcome relating to persuading and influencing. They also report developing skills that will be useful for the workplace, and identify additional learning benefits. Qualitative feedback suggests some discomfort with the inherent non-traditional instructor-learner relationship. Research limitations/implications – Acknowledging the limitations of using students’ own perceptions, the narrow focus on one course and the singular experience of summative peer assessment this investigation highlights the need for additional research into the impact of pedagogies where “teachers” deliver more of a facilitation role. Practical implications – The study reinforces the need for educators to invest time and effort in explaining the processes and issues involved with peer assessment. It highlights the contribution that creative industries’ educators might be able to make to the wider development of enterprise skills across higher education disciplines. Originality/value – The study contributes to two important but under-explored areas of educational research: the development of enterprise skills outside the business school and the use of peer assessment within enterprise education. It provides a case study for non-traditional assessment and identifies a key challenge associated with the emergent pedagogical approach of heutagogy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document