Effect of Extending the Growing Period on Yield Formation of Sugar Beet

2015 ◽  
Vol 202 (6) ◽  
pp. 530-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Schnepel ◽  
C. M. Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Yield Formation

Tissue composition and arrangement in sugar beet genotypes of different tissue strength with regard to damage and pathogen infestation

2020 ◽  
pp. 114-123
Author(s):  
Nelia Nause ◽  
Tobias Meier ◽  
Christa M. Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Sugar Yield ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Genotypic Differences ◽  
Tissue Composition ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Puncture Resistance ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Yield Formation

Drought stress affects yield formation and quality of sugar beet. The aim of this study was to identify the growing period, in which drought stress has the greatest impact on growth, and furthermore, to analyze the response of different sugar beet genotypes. Causes for a different response should be identified. In pot experiments in the greenhouse, drought stress was simulated by reducing irrigation to 60% of the water holding capacity (WHC) for four weeks at various growth stages followed by re-watering. Growth reduction was greatest when drought stress occurred early in the season: the content of the quality-determining non-sugars was highest, sugar yield and beet diameter were lowest. Responses of the genotypes in sugar yield, but primarily in the accumulation of osmotically active substances differed. Despite re-watering after drought stress the restrictions could not be compensated during growth. The transpiration coefficient of the drought-stressed treatments was only slightly different to the control, because water consumption in the control did not either increase at average air temperatures beyond 23 °C. The strong effect of early drought stress could be attributed to the high growth rates, so that a limited water supply affected yield formation more than at later growth stages. The storage losses of sugar beet genotypes are closely related to damage during harvest and subsequent infestation with mould and rots. Genetic variation for storability seems to be primarily linked to textural properties of the roots such as the resistance against mechanical damage. However, no information is available about the tissue strength, tissue composition and structural organization leading to an enhanced resistance against damage and pathogen attack. Therefore, the aims of the study were the identification of genotypic differences concerning tissue strength of the beet, the relation to damage and pathogen infestation and the underlying physiological basis of tissue strength. Field trials were carried out with 6 genotypes at 2 locations in 2018. The roots were harvested in August and November. After harvest in November, a storage trial was carried out. The root strength increased from August to November. Beets with a high puncture resistance of the periderm also had a firm inner tissue. Genotypic differences in puncture resistance were not affected by the harvest time, indicating that this trait is stable throughout the growing period. A higher puncture resistance of the beet was related to a lower mould growth during storage. Genotypes with varying tissue strength also differed in fiber content (AIR), but the composition of AIR was stable over genotypes. The number of cambium rings seems not to essentially influence the tissue strength of the beet. In the further course of the project, microscopic analyzes will clarify, whether genotypic differences in tissue strength can be attributed to cell size or cell wall thickness.

Early drought stress: Effects on yield formation and quality of sugar beet

2020 ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Henning Ebmeyer ◽  
Christa M. Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
High Growth ◽  
Sugar Yield ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Different Response ◽  
Yield Formation

Drought stress affects yield formation and quality of sugar beet. The aim of this study was to identify the growing period, in which drought stress has the greatest impact on growth, and furthermore, to analyze the response of different sugar beet genotypes. Causes for a different response should be identified. In pot experiments in the greenhouse, drought stress was simulated by reducing irrigation to 60% of the water holding capacity (WHC) for four weeks at various growth stages followed by re-watering. Growth reduction was greatest when drought stress occurred early in the season: the content of the quality-determining non-sugars was highest, sugar yield and beet diameter were lowest. Responses of the genotypes in sugar yield, but primarily in the accumulation of osmotically active substances differed. Despite re-watering after drought stress the restrictions could not be compensated during growth. The transpiration coefficient of the drought-stressed treatments was only slightly different to the control, because water consumption in the control did not either increase at average air temperatures beyond 23 °C. The strong effect of early drought stress could be attributed to the high growth rates, so that a limited water supply affected yield formation more than at later growth stages.

scholarly journals Potassium dynamics in the soil and yield formation in a long-term field experiment

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (No. 12) ◽  
pp. 531-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.W. Scherer ◽  
H.E. Goldbach ◽  
J. Clemens
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Field Experiment ◽  
Sharp Decline ◽  
Saturation Extract ◽  
Potassium Dynamics ◽  
Fixation Capacity ◽  
Yield Formation ◽  
Term Field

The influence of an interrupted K fertilisation on different K fractions of the soil, yield formation and K uptake by different crops was investigated in a long-term field experiment on Luvisol derived from loess. Irrespective of the previous K fertilisation, the interruption of K fertilisation resulted in a sharp decline of CAL extractable K. K concentration in the saturation extract as well as HCl extractable K were reduced while K fixation capacity increased within 10 years after omitting K. Omitting K fertilisation decreased yields of sugar beet and potatoes while cereals were not affected, although K uptake of all crops reacted to the differentiated K supply to a different extent.

scholarly journals Impact of Superabsorbent Polymers and Variety on Yield, Quality and Physiological Parameters of the Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris prov. Altissima Doell)

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 757
Author(s):  
Vladimír Pačuta ◽  
Marek Rašovský ◽  
Beata Michalska-Klimczak ◽  
Zdzislaw Wyszyňski
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Sugar Content ◽  
Photosynthetic Apparatus ◽  
Vegetation Period ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Superabsorbent Polymers ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Close Relationship

In this study, we focus on the mitigation of the negative impact of drought using the application of superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) to seed. One way to monitor drought and quantify its impact on crops in field conditions is the nondestructive measurement of physiological processes of the crops using spectral indexes LAI and PRI during vegetation. Therefore, during 2018 and 2019, the increase in biomass and intensity of photosynthetic activity was monitored, and the effect of the SAPs application on the yield parameters of the sugar beet was evaluated in the trial conditions (control, SAPs) at the end of the vegetation period. Through statistical analysis, the significant impact (α ≤ 0.01) of SAPs application on the values of spectral indexes LAI and PRI as well as root and white sugar yields was found. Although the sugar content difference between SAPs and control conditions was not statistically significant, SAPs had a positive influence on the value of this parameter. It was found through periodic monitoring of spectral indexes during the growing period that the crop in the SAPs condition showed higher values of PRI at the beginning of vegetation, which was caused by the accumulation of moisture in the vicinity of the seed and subsequent faster growth of roots and photosynthetic apparatus. Moreover, the values of LAI were significantly higher (α ≤ 0.01) in the SAPs condition throughout the vegetation period. In the interaction evaluation, we confirmed that in both years the values of LAI were higher in the condition with SAPs compared with the control. In contrast, the PRI values were significantly different across conditions. The interaction of conditions with variety showed that the variety Brian obtained higher values of LAI and PRI in the SAPs condition. The correlation analysis found a positive correlation between spectral indexes LAI:PRI (r = 0.6184**), and between LAI:RY (r = 0.6715**), LAI:WSY (r = 0.5760**), and PRI:RY (r = 0.5038*), which confirms the close relationship between physiological processes in the plant and the size of its yield.

The effect of sowing date and harvesting date on the yield of sugar beet

1970 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hull ◽  
D. J. Webb
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Field Experiment ◽  
Sowing Date ◽  
Sugar Yield ◽  
Negligible Effect ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Harvest Dates ◽  
Sowing Dates ◽  
Effect On Yield ◽  
The Relationship

SUMMARYA field experiment in each year 1963 to 1967 in Suffolk, England, tested the effect on yield of sugar beet of sowing dates ranging from 13 March to 11 May and harvest dates ranging from 20 September to 8 December. Sowings in March or early April gave similar yields of sugar but with later sowings yield decreased progressively faster. The relationship is represented by the equationy = 106·3 (±2·24) + 0·212 (±0·184)x-0·009 (±0·003)x2,y = yield as percentage of mean (60·1 cwt/acre of sugar), x = number of days after 12 March.Delayed harvest increased sugar yield; the relationship is represented by the equationy = 80·22 (±1·51) + 0·836 (±0·09)z-0·006 (±0·001)z2,z = number of days after 19 September. This represents an increase of 0·247 cwt/acre/day of sugar in October and 0·083 cwt/acre/day in November, equivalent to about 2½ tons/acre of roots in October and 1 ton/acre in November.The effect on sugar yield of different lengths of growing period, which ranged from 138 to 271 days, is represented by the equationy = 38·7 (±26·6) + 1·045 (±0·267)a-0·0017 (±0·0007)a2,a = number of days between sowing and harvest.On average, sowing date had negligible effect on sugar percentage at harvest. In 3 years sugar percentage increased after the first harvest to a maximum and then decreased; in 2 years it decreased with consecutive harvests.

The effect of time of sowing and harvesting on growth, yield and nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet

1973 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Draycott ◽  
D. J. Webb ◽  
E. M. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Sugar Yield ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Stages Of Growth ◽  
Nitrogen Requirement ◽  
Fertilizer Requirement

SummaryFour field experiments (1968–71) investigated the effect of changing the length of the growing period on the nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. The crop was sown on three occasions (March–May), harvested on three occasions (September–December) and given four amounts of fertilizer (0–225 kg N/ha). Plant samples were analysed at several stages of growth (1969–71) in an attempt to predict the amount of nitrogen fertilizer needed for maximum sugar yield and also at the end of the season to determine the nitrogen uptake. Increasing the length of the growing period increased sugar yield greatly but the amount of nitrogen fertilizer needed for maximum sugar yield was unchanged. The crop given the largest dressing of nitrogen and with the longest growing period contained most total nitrogen, but in every experiment, giving more than 75 kg N/ha neither increased nor decreased the sugar yield significantly. As a result of the small variations in nitrogen requirement, the plant analyses during the growing season were of little value in predicting the needs of the crop.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document