scholarly journals Prevalence of hypomineralised second primary molars (HSPM): A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte McCarra ◽  
Isabel Cristina Olegário ◽  
Anne C. O’Connell ◽  
Rona Leith
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Hypomineralised Second Primary Molars

scholarly journals Early detection of esophageal second primary tumors using Lugol chromoendoscopy in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Head & Neck ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1122-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oisín Bugter ◽  
Steffi E. M. van de Ven ◽  
Jose A. Hardillo ◽  
Marco J. Bruno ◽  
Arjun D. Koch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Second Primary Tumors

Risk of second primary tumors in GIST survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Gianluca Tomasello ◽  
Sandro Barni ◽  
Antonio Varricchio ◽  
Antonio Costanzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Second Primary Tumors

Risk factors of hypomineralised second primary molars in a group of Iraqi schoolchildren

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Ghanim ◽  
M. V. Morgan ◽  
R. J. Mariño ◽  
D. L. Bailey ◽  
D. J. Manton
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Hypomineralised Second Primary Molars

scholarly journals Second Primary Malignancy Risk After Radioactive Iodine Treatment for Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Thyroid ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Sawka ◽  
Lehana Thabane ◽  
Luciana Parlea ◽  
Irada Ibrahim-Zada ◽  
Richard W. Tsang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Radioactive Iodine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Primary Malignancy ◽  
Primary Malignancy ◽  
Malignancy Risk ◽  
Iodine Treatment

scholarly journals Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e054157
Author(s):  
Julian Hirt ◽  
Gero Langer ◽  
Fabian Wilde ◽  
Dorothee Bauernschmidt ◽  
Gabriele Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Informal Carers ◽  
Study Designs

IntroductionInformation technology can enhance timely and individual support for people with dementia and informal carers. There is some evidence that people with dementia and informal carers would benefit from technology-based counselling. However, it remains unclear which features of those interventions relate to beneficial outcomes and which aspects are necessary for a successful implementation. Therefore, the primary objectives are: (1) to identify conditions of successful implementation of technology-based counselling interventions in dementia and (2) to investigate the effectiveness of those interventions.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review. The first primary objective requires evidence from various study designs addressing aspects on effective and non-effective implementation of technology-based counselling. This could be telephone-based, web-based or mobile-based interventions for people with dementia and informal carers. For the second primary objective, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with any outcomes will be included. Year of publication and language will not be restricted. We will search CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science up to April 2021. Additionally, we will perform web searching and citation tracking. To achieve the first primary objective, a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) will be conducted. The QCA enables us to identify necessary or sufficient components for a successful implementation. To reach the second primary objective, a meta-analysis will be performed with respect to potential clinical and statistical heterogeneity of RCTs. The revised Risk of Bias tool 2.0 will be used to check the risk of bias in RCTs. For all other study designs, the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool will be used.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this review. We will disseminate our findings through scientific and non-scientific journal articles and conference presentations as well as formats directed to the public and decision-makers in healthcare.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021245473.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document