scholarly journals Factors influencing the perception and decision‐making process of consumers on the choice of healthier foods in the United Kingdom: A systematic review using narrative synthesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Ogundijo ◽  
Ayten A. Tas ◽  
Bukola A. Onarinde
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing

scholarly journals A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents’ vaccination decision-making in the United Kingdom

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 603-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice S. Forster ◽  
Lauren Rockliffe ◽  
Amanda J. Chorley ◽  
Laura A.V. Marlow ◽  
Helen Bedford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Qualitative Systematic Review ◽  
Vaccination Decision

THE DEFENCE SECTOR AND ITS EFFECT ON NATIONAL SECURITY DURING THE CZECHOSLOVAK (MUNICH)

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-84
Author(s):  
Ales BINAR
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Security ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
International Conference ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Defence Sector

The Czechoslovak (Munich) Crisis of 1938 was concluded by an international conference that took place in Munich on 29-30 September 1938. The decision of the participating powers, i.e. France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, was made without any respect for Czechoslovakia and its representatives. The aim of this paper is to examine the role of the defence sector, i.e. the representatives of the ministry of defence and the Czechoslovak armed forces during the Czechoslovak (Munich) Crisis in the period from mid-March to the beginning of October 1938. There is also a question as to, whether there are similarities between the position then and the present-day position of the army in the decision-making process.

scholarly journals Influences on prescribing decision-making among non-medical prescribers in the United Kingdom: systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trudi McIntosh ◽  
Derek Stewart ◽  
Katrina Forbes-McKay ◽  
Dorothy McCaig ◽  
Scott Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United Kingdom

scholarly journals Delivering genomic medicine in the United Kingdom National Health Service: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2667-2675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Pearce ◽  
Emma Goettke ◽  
Nina Hallowell ◽  
Pauline McCormack ◽  
Frances Flinter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health ◽  
Genomic Medicine ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
The United Kingdom

scholarly journals Appraisal: a process for control or development?: a study of teacher accountability, power and decision-making with emphasis on the New Zealand context

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sandra Wendy Aikin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Teacher Appraisal ◽  
Historical Study ◽  
Teacher Accountability ◽  
Professional Performance ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing

<p>This sociological-historical study aims to contribute to the understanding and analysis of the changing pattern of power and decision-making in education apparent in the development of teacher appraisal policy. The study provides an account of the factors influencing the New Zealand teacher appraisal policy draft which at the time of writing is still to be released. A range of considerations to be taken into account is exposed and the signposts for the development of teacher appraisal policy are made explicit. This is achieved by making the process transparent as well as recognising and evaluating the contribution made by participants. A key feature of this study is the examination of the 'policy importation' process as the emerging demand for greater teacher accountability in both the United Kingdom and New Zealand has resulted in the formalisation of the assessment of teachers' professional performance through appraisal policies. This study argues that three perspectives have shaped the debate on teacher appraisal: neo-liberal market; managerial; and professional. It posits that a noticeable shift has been made towards the requirements of managerial accountability and examines the reasons for this.</p>

The penholder system and the rule of law in the Security Council decision-making: Setback or improvement?

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-156
Author(s):  
Marie-Eve Loiselle
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Security Council ◽  
The United States ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Council Decision

AbstractThis article analyses the decision-making process of the UN Security Council when it adopts outcome documents, such as resolutions, Presidential statements and press statements. It is commonly assumed that because of their veto power and permanency China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have greater influence than their elected counterparts in shaping those outcomes. In recent years, that control has been strengthened by the penholdership system. Under this practice, one or more members, usually France, the United States or the United Kingdom (P3), take leadership over a situation on the agenda of the Council. When ‘holding the pen’ a member often decides what action the Council should take, then drafts an outcome document that it negotiates with other permanent members before sharing the text with elected members. This article explores the development of this practice and its impact on the respect for the rule of law in the Security Council’s decision-making process. It argues that, while concentrating power in the hands of the P3, hence diminishing transparency and the opportunity for all members to participate in the decision-making of the Council, at the same time the penholdership system also provides an avenue to strengthen elected members’ influence in ways that promote respect for the international rule of law.

scholarly journals Appraisal: a process for control or development?: a study of teacher accountability, power and decision-making with emphasis on the New Zealand context

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sandra Wendy Aikin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Teacher Appraisal ◽  
Historical Study ◽  
Teacher Accountability ◽  
Professional Performance ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing

<p>This sociological-historical study aims to contribute to the understanding and analysis of the changing pattern of power and decision-making in education apparent in the development of teacher appraisal policy. The study provides an account of the factors influencing the New Zealand teacher appraisal policy draft which at the time of writing is still to be released. A range of considerations to be taken into account is exposed and the signposts for the development of teacher appraisal policy are made explicit. This is achieved by making the process transparent as well as recognising and evaluating the contribution made by participants. A key feature of this study is the examination of the 'policy importation' process as the emerging demand for greater teacher accountability in both the United Kingdom and New Zealand has resulted in the formalisation of the assessment of teachers' professional performance through appraisal policies. This study argues that three perspectives have shaped the debate on teacher appraisal: neo-liberal market; managerial; and professional. It posits that a noticeable shift has been made towards the requirements of managerial accountability and examines the reasons for this.</p>

scholarly journals Protocol for systematic review: patient decision aids for total hip and knee arthroplasty decision-making

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lissa Pacheco-Brousseau ◽  
Marylène Charette ◽  
Dawn Stacey ◽  
Stéphane Poitras
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Patient Decision Aids ◽  
Patient Decision ◽  
Hip And Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract Background Total hip and knee arthroplasty are a highly performed surgery; however, patient satisfaction with surgery results and patient involvement in the decision-making process remains low. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are tools used in clinical practices to facilitate active patient involvement in healthcare decision-making. Nonetheless, PtDA effects have not been systematically evaluated for hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) decision-making. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effect of patient decision aids compared to alternative of care on quality and process of decision-making when provided to adults with hip and knee osteoarthritis considering primary elective TJA. Methods This systematic review will follow the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. This protocol was reported based on the PRISMA-P checklist guidelines. Studies will be searched in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Eligible studies will be randomized control trial (RCT) evaluating the effect of PtDA on TJA decision-making. Descriptive and meta-analysis of outcomes will include decision quality (knowledge and values-based choice), decisional conflict, patient involvement, decision-making process satisfaction, actual decision made, health outcomes, and harm(s). Risk of bias will be evaluated with Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for RCTs. Quality and strength of recommendations will be appraised with Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Discussion This review will provide a summary of RCT findings on PtDA effect on decision-making quality and process of adults with knee and hip osteoarthritis considering primary elective TJA. Further, it will provide evidence comparing different types of PtDA used for TJA decision-making. This review is expected to inform further research on joint replacement decision-making quality and processes and on ways PtDAs facilitate shared decision-making for orthopedic surgery. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020171334

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document