scholarly journals A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents’ vaccination decision-making in the United Kingdom

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 603-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice S. Forster ◽  
Lauren Rockliffe ◽  
Amanda J. Chorley ◽  
Laura A.V. Marlow ◽  
Helen Bedford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Qualitative Systematic Review ◽  
Vaccination Decision

scholarly journals Influences on prescribing decision-making among non-medical prescribers in the United Kingdom: systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trudi McIntosh ◽  
Derek Stewart ◽  
Katrina Forbes-McKay ◽  
Dorothy McCaig ◽  
Scott Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United Kingdom

scholarly journals Appraisal: a process for control or development?: a study of teacher accountability, power and decision-making with emphasis on the New Zealand context

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sandra Wendy Aikin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Teacher Appraisal ◽  
Historical Study ◽  
Teacher Accountability ◽  
Professional Performance ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing

<p>This sociological-historical study aims to contribute to the understanding and analysis of the changing pattern of power and decision-making in education apparent in the development of teacher appraisal policy. The study provides an account of the factors influencing the New Zealand teacher appraisal policy draft which at the time of writing is still to be released. A range of considerations to be taken into account is exposed and the signposts for the development of teacher appraisal policy are made explicit. This is achieved by making the process transparent as well as recognising and evaluating the contribution made by participants. A key feature of this study is the examination of the 'policy importation' process as the emerging demand for greater teacher accountability in both the United Kingdom and New Zealand has resulted in the formalisation of the assessment of teachers' professional performance through appraisal policies. This study argues that three perspectives have shaped the debate on teacher appraisal: neo-liberal market; managerial; and professional. It posits that a noticeable shift has been made towards the requirements of managerial accountability and examines the reasons for this.</p>

scholarly journals Appraisal: a process for control or development?: a study of teacher accountability, power and decision-making with emphasis on the New Zealand context

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sandra Wendy Aikin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Teacher Appraisal ◽  
Historical Study ◽  
Teacher Accountability ◽  
Professional Performance ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing

<p>This sociological-historical study aims to contribute to the understanding and analysis of the changing pattern of power and decision-making in education apparent in the development of teacher appraisal policy. The study provides an account of the factors influencing the New Zealand teacher appraisal policy draft which at the time of writing is still to be released. A range of considerations to be taken into account is exposed and the signposts for the development of teacher appraisal policy are made explicit. This is achieved by making the process transparent as well as recognising and evaluating the contribution made by participants. A key feature of this study is the examination of the 'policy importation' process as the emerging demand for greater teacher accountability in both the United Kingdom and New Zealand has resulted in the formalisation of the assessment of teachers' professional performance through appraisal policies. This study argues that three perspectives have shaped the debate on teacher appraisal: neo-liberal market; managerial; and professional. It posits that a noticeable shift has been made towards the requirements of managerial accountability and examines the reasons for this.</p>

A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness of decision aids for vaccination decision-making

Vaccine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra Vujovich-Dunn ◽  
Jessica Kaufman ◽  
Catherine King ◽  
S. Rachel Skinner ◽  
Handan Wand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Vaccination Decision

Pelaksanaan Sistem Tribunal di Malaysia: Ke Arah Penambahbaikan

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-242
Author(s):  
Fariza Romli ◽  
◽  
Harlida Abdul Wahab
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Sustainable Development Goals ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
Administrative Body

The existence of a tribunal system, in addition to helping to smooth the administration system, is considered as sharing power with the judiciary in making decisions. Thus arose the question of decision- making power and prevention of abuse by the administrative body. In line with the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 to ensure justice in support of effective, responsible and inclusive institutions, transparent and fair practices are essential for ensuring people’s trust in the administrative body and government. This paper, therefore, discusses the tribunal system and its implementation in Malaysia. In view of this, tribunal systems that exist in other countries, especially the United Kingdom, are also examined as models for improvement. Matters such as autonomy or control of power and the trial process are among the issues raised. Recommendations for improvement are proposed based on three basic principles—openness, fairness and impartiality—to further strengthen the implementation of the existing tribunal system in line with developments abroad.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document