Efficacy of herbal versus chlorhexidine‐based mouthwashes towards oral hygiene maintenance in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Kommuri ◽  
Dimitrios Michelogiannakis ◽  
Basir A. Barmak ◽  
P. Emile Rossouw ◽  
Fawad Javed
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Orthodontic Therapy

scholarly journals Association between Oral Hygiene and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2873
Author(s):  
Cornelia Melinda Adi Santoso ◽  
Fera Ketti ◽  
Taufan Bramantoro ◽  
Judit Zsuga ◽  
Attila Nagy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Reference Lists ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tooth Brushing ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Poor Oral Hygiene ◽  
Dental Visits ◽  
Substantial Heterogeneity

Emerging evidence has linked poor oral hygiene to metabolic syndrome (MetS), but previously, no summary of evidence has been conducted on the topic. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the associations of oral hygiene status and care with MetS. A systematic search of the PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to March 17, 2021, and examination of reference lists was conducted to identify eligible observational studies. A random-effects model was applied to pool the effects of oral hygiene status and care on MetS. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and had sufficient methodological quality. Good oral hygiene status (OR = 0.30 (0.13–0.66); I2 = 91%), frequent tooth brushing (OR = 0.68 (0.58–0.80); I2 = 89%), and frequent interdental cleaning (OR = 0.89 (0.81–0.99); I2 = 27%) were associated with a lower risk of MetS. Only one study examined the association between dental visits and MetS (OR = 1.10 (0.77–1.55)). Our findings suggested that there might be inverse associations of oral hygiene status, tooth-brushing frequency, and interdental cleaning with MetS. However, substantial heterogeneity for tooth-brushing frequency and inconsistent results for oral hygiene status in subgroup analyses were observed. There was insufficient evidence for the association between dental visits and MetS. Further longitudinal studies are needed to investigate these associations.

scholarly journals The association between oral hygiene and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 332-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attawood Lertpimonchai ◽  
Sasivimol Rattanasiri ◽  
Sakda Arj-Ong Vallibhakara ◽  
John Attia ◽  
Ammarin Thakkinstian
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis

Effect of mHealth in improving oral hygiene: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirian P. Toniazzo ◽  
Daniela Nodari ◽  
Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz ◽  
Patricia Weidlich
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Effects of Educational Interventions on Oral Hygiene: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sakineh Dadipoor ◽  
Mohtasham Ghaffari ◽  
Mahsa Mortazavi New ◽  
Abbas Alipour ◽  
Ali Safari-Moradabadi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Role Playing ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Oral Diseases ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of school based oral health interventions programs on students’ oral hygiene, in developing countries through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Our investigation was conducted in electronic databases including MEDLINE Ovid), Embase Ovid, Scopus), Web of Science from 2000 to march 2018.The data were extracted based on a standard data collection form specific to observational studies, and entered into RevMan 2014. Inclusion criteria included individually randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster-RCTs including quasi- experimental studies that were related to oral health interventions. Software RevMan 2014was used for meta-analysis. A meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models. Results: Twelve studies of students in this review finally entered the study including five individual RCTs, four cluster-RCTs, and three quasi-experimental studies. The intervention study period ranged from 1 month to 9 month. Interventions described in the studies briefly included oral health education with activities such as lectures, albums, slides, pamphlets, posters, and role playing. Meta-analyses showed a significant difference in knowledge (SMD 3.31, 95% CI 2.52 to 4.11; I 2 = 98; P < 0.001), attitude (SMD 1.99, 95% CI 0. 43 to 3.54; I 2 = 99; P < 0.001), behavior (SMD 4.74, 95% CI 3.70 to 5.77; I 2 = 99; P < 0.001), plaque index (SMD -1.01, 95% CI -1.50 to -0. 51; I 2 = 97; P < 0.001) and Gingival index (SMD 0. 33, 95% CI -0. 36 to 1. 02; I 2 = 98; P = 0.34) for students receiving educational interventions compared to those receiving usual care . Discussion: The systematic review concludes that educational interventions are effective for improving oral health knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, etc., which could potentially lead to improved oral health, reduced oral diseases, and reduced costs from treating oral diseases.

Effectiveness of oral health education on oral hygiene and dental caries in schoolchildren: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Stein ◽  
Nathália Maria Lopes Santos ◽  
Juliana Balbinot Hilgert ◽  
Fernando Neves Hugo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Dental Caries ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Health Education

scholarly journals Efficacy of Instruments for Professional Oral Hygiene on Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Domenico Baldi ◽  
Luisa De Giorgis ◽  
Maria Menini ◽  
Franco Motta ◽  
Jacopo Colombo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Air Polishing ◽  
Full Text Review ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Ottawa Scale

Professional oral hygiene is fundamental to prevent peri-implant disease. Appropriate instruments should be used in patients with restorations supported by dental implants: they should be effective in deposits removal without damaging the implant components surface. The aim of the present study is to investigate and summarize the results regarding the efficacy of oral hygiene techniques described in the literature in the last 10 years in patients rehabilitated with dental implants not affected by perimplantitis. The present systematic review was conducted according to guidelines reported in the indications of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The focused question was: “Which are the most effective instruments for professional oral hygiene on implants not affected by perimplantitis?”. The initial database search yielded a total of 934 entries found in PubMed®/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. After full text review and application of the eligibility criteria, the final selection consisted of 19 articles. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Curette, scalers and air polishing were the devices most frequently investigated in the included studies. In particular, glycine powder air polishing appeared to be significantly effective in reducing peri-implant inflammation and plaque around implants. The application of the more recent erythritol powder air polishing also yielded good clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to improve the knowledge on the topic in order to develop standardized protocols and understand the specific indications for different types of implant-supported rehabilitations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document