The effect of antiseptic oral sprays on dental plaque and gingival inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zhang ◽  
N Ab Malik ◽  
C McGrath ◽  
OLT Lam
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vini Mehta ◽  
Ankita Mathur ◽  
D Gopalakrishnan ◽  
SA Rizwan ◽  
SahanaHegde Shetiya ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz ◽  
Juliano Cavagni ◽  
Gerson Pedro José Langa ◽  
Bernal Stewart ◽  
Zilson Malheiros ◽  
...  

Background. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has been used for more than a century clinically to control plaque and gingival inflammation, with unclear supporting evidence. Aim. The aim of the present systematic review of the literature is to assess the effect of mouth rinses with H2O2 on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and oral microorganisms. Methods. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched with the following focused question: what is the effect of hydrogen peroxide, in comparison to chlorhexidine or to a placebo solution, in oral microbiota control, dental plaque, and gingival inflammatory outcomes? Two independent examiners retrieved the articles and evaluated the evidence. Results. The majority of included studies were performed with 1.5% H2O2. Results related to plaque accumulation generally demonstrate a slightly better effect of H2O2 as compared to placebo mouth rinses, however with a lower performance as compared to chlorhexidine. In terms of gingival inflammation, H2O2 performs better than placebo and more clearly demonstrates an anti-inflammation effect. No studies evaluated the effect of H2O2 against viruses or fungi. In terms of bacteria, H2O2 demonstrates an antibacterial effect. Conclusion. Rinsing with H2O2 has the potential to affect plaque, gingivitis, and oral bacteria, as compared to placebo. However, the antibacterial results are not comparable to the performance of chlorhexidine.


Oral Diseases ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Simoni Santi ◽  
Maísa Casarin ◽  
Alessandra Pascotini Grellmann ◽  
Leandro Chambrone ◽  
Fabricio Batistin Zanatta

Author(s):  
Chandrashekar Janakiram ◽  
Ramanarayanan Venkitachalam ◽  
Paul Fontelo ◽  
Timothy J. Iafolla ◽  
Bruce A. Dye

Biomimetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Fiorillo ◽  
Gabriele Cervino ◽  
Alan Scott Herford ◽  
Luigi Laino ◽  
Marco Cicciù

In recent years there has been a lot of talk about toothpastes with a particular chemical compound: stannous fluoride (SnF2). Its presence is currently still highly controversial, as the latter could have negative health effects. The different companies that produce toothpastes express its dosage in ppm. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to analyze all randomized clinical trials in the literature over the last 10 years and to draw clear results on the function of stannous fluoride, for this purpose the authors performed a Mann–Whitney U Test. Materials: The first analysis of the literature produced a number greater than 800 results, subsequently applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and following a manual analysis of the results, 26 manuscripts have been obtained. Results: From the results analyzed in this review, it could be shown that stannous fluoride does not present important contraindications, if not those commonly reported for fluorine. A meta-analysis on enamel loss has been conducted, it shows that SnF2 products provide better results with a p < 0.05 value. Conclusion: This compound could have significant effects in favor of erosion and recalcification of the enamel, on the biofilm formation, gingival inflammation, and in addition, it could be an important aid in the removal of tooth stains and halitosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esam Halboub ◽  
Sadeq A. Al-Maweri ◽  
Mohammed Al-Wesabi ◽  
Ahlam Al-Kamel ◽  
Anas Shamala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document