scholarly journals A randomized clinical trial comparing plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating–rotating power toothbrush to a manual toothbrush by multiple examiners

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Kurtz ◽  
M Reise ◽  
M Klukowska ◽  
JM Grender ◽  
H Timm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Plaque Removal ◽  
Manual Toothbrush

scholarly journals Effectiveness of the GumChucks flossing system compared to string floss for interdental plaque removal in children: a randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Lin ◽  
Márcia Dinis ◽  
Chi-Hong Tseng ◽  
Melissa Agnello ◽  
Xuesong He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Plaque Removal

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-110
Author(s):  
Gurusamy Kayalvizhi ◽  
Venkatesan Ramesh ◽  
Selva B Arumugam ◽  
Sarangapani Radha ◽  
Suganya Mohandoss
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Plaque Removal

Dental plaque removal and motivation of a manual toothbrush versus an interactive power toothbrush in young people with fixed orthodontic appliances: a single examiner-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 43828-43831
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Auxiliary Result ◽  
Plaque Score ◽  
Plaque Removal ◽  
Fixed Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Manual Toothbrush ◽  
Treatment Contrast ◽  
Mouth Wash

Introduction: The goal of this 2-arm equal preliminary clinical trial was to decide the plaque expulsion efficacy (primary result) and the motivation assessment (auxiliary result) looking at a manual versus an interactive power toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Methods: Sixty teenagers with fixed orthodontic appliances who reported to the Department of Periodontics for routine oral prophylaxis in the both arches were randomized in a 1:1 proportion parallel, randomized, examiner-blindcontrolled clinical preliminary. Qualification criteria included in any event 16 characteristic teeth, 1-6 "center consideration zones," plaque score of ≥1.75, no serious caries, gingivits and periodontitis, no dental prophylaxis, no smoking, no anti-microbials, and no chlorhexidine mouth wash. Subjects were to brush solo with either an interactive power toothbrush (Oral-B Professional Care 6000, D36/EB20) with Bluetooth innovation or a customary manual toothbrush (Oral-B Indicator 35 delicate). Center consideration regions were each brushed for 10 extra seconds like inter-proximal spaces. Plaque removal was surveyed with the utilization of the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) to decide change from standard at 2 weeks followed by 6 weeks. Supervised brushing at screening and post-treatment visits recorded real brushing times. Subject-revealed motivational viewpoints were recorded at screening and week 6. Results: Fifty-nine subjects between 13-17 years finished the investigation. The interactive power toothbrush gave significantly (P\0.001) more noteworthy plaque decrease versus the manual toothbrush at 2 and 6 week as indicated by the entire mouth TMQHPI. The treatment contrast in balanced mean plaque change from standard was 0.777 (95% CI 0.614-0.940) at week 2 and 0.834 (0.686-0.981) at week 6. Mean decreases in the quantity of center consideration regions were likewise significantly more noteworthy (P \0.001) in the power brush bunch at weeks 2 and 6. Brushing times increased significantly at weeks 2 and 6 (P #0.013) versus standard baseline in the interactive powertoothbrush group only.Subject-revealed motivation was significantly increased in the interactive power tooth brush group at week 6 as opposed to screening (P #0.005). Conclusions: An interactive power toothbrush produced increased brushing times and significantly more prominent plaque removal versus a manual brush.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of sharp end and rounded end bristle toothbrush

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulus Januar ◽  
Anastasia Susetyo ◽  
Ratih Widyastuti
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Crossover Design ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Public ◽  
Plaque Removal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Manual Toothbrush ◽  
The Mean

Background: Numerous designs of manual toothbrush are available in the market with the claims of superiority in plaque removal. It often makes the public confuse which is the best design. The sharp end bristle toothbrush is a modification that commercially available in the market. Purpose: The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness in plaque removal of the sharp end bristle toothbrush and the rounded end bristle toothbrush. Methods: This clinical trial was a double blind crossover design. The subjects were 65 dental students, divided into two groups for comparing the 2 types of  toothbrush. On the 1st day, the allocated toothbrushes were distributedto each group according to their designation, and the subjects were instructed to use the toothbrushes according their normal daily practices. On the 1st, 7th, and 14th day, the subjects were scored using the patient hygiene performance index (PHP index) and the gingival index. Based on cross over design, the same procedure was repeated during the 2 week second test periods using different type of toothbrush respectively. Results: The mean scores of the 2 groups showed no significant difference on the beginning the study. Though minor differences were observed in the effectiveness of toothbrush, but the comparison of the two types of toothbrush showed no statistically significant differences on 7th and 14th day. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between sharp end and rounded end bristle toot brusher. There is no manual toothbrush superiorly designed than the others single superior design of manual toothbrush.Latar belakang: Berbagai jenis desain sikat gigi saat ini terdapat di pasaran, dengan masing-masing menyatakan keunggulannya dalam membersihkan plak. Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap dua jenis sikat gigi manual yaitu sikat gigi dengan ujung bulu sikat runcing dan ujung bulus sikat bulat. Tujuan: Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk membandingkan efektivitas membersihkan plak antara 2 jenis sikat gigi. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan percobaan klinis dengan desain penyilangan (crossover) secara tertutup ganda (double blind). Subyek penelitian 65 mahasiswa dibagi 2 kelompok. Pada hari pertama, sikat gigi dibagikan pada masing-masing kelompok yang telah ditentukan jenis sikat giginya, dan diinstruksikan untuk menggunakannya sesuai kebiasaan mereka. Pada hari ke 1, 7, dan 14 dilakukan pengukuran indeks PHP dan indeks gingiva. Berdasarkan desain penyilangan, proses yang sama diulangi pada masing-masing kelompok dengan menggunakan jenis sikat gigi yang berbeda. Hasil: Pada awal penelitian tidak terdapat perbedaan skor pada ke 2 kelompok. Meski terdapat sedikit perbedaan, namun tidak terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna dalam efektivitas kedua jenis sikat gigi setelah penggunaan selama 7 dan 14 hari. Kesimpulan: Tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara sikat gigi jenis ujung bulu sikat bulat dan ujung bulu sikat runcing. Tidak terdapat satupun jenis sikat gigi yang paling baik.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document