scholarly journals Online information for parents caring for their premature baby at home: A focus group study and systematic web search

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Alderdice ◽  
Phyl Gargan ◽  
Emma McCall ◽  
Linda Franck
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Web Search ◽  
Premature Baby ◽  
Online Information ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
At Home

scholarly journals Web Search Behavior and Information Needs of People With Multiple Sclerosis: Focus Group Study and Analysis of Online Postings

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cinzia Colombo ◽  
Paola Mosconi ◽  
Paolo Confalonieri ◽  
Isabella Baroni ◽  
Silvia Traversa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Web Search ◽  
Search Behavior ◽  
Focus Group Study

scholarly journals Safe start at home: what parents of newborns need after early discharge from hospital – a focus group study

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Kurth ◽  
Katrin Krähenbühl ◽  
Manuela Eicher ◽  
Susanne Rodmann ◽  
Luzia Fölmli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Discharge From Hospital ◽  
At Home

scholarly journals Attitudes and perspectives of older adults on technologies for assessing frailty in home settings: a focus group study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Bian ◽  
Bing Ye ◽  
Anna Hoonakker ◽  
Alex Mihailidis
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Consumer Involvement ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Specific Technology ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background The rapid development of technology such as sensors and artificial intelligence in recent years enables monitoring frailty criteria to assess frailty early and accurately from a remote location such as a home. However, research shows technologies being abandoned or rejected by users due to a lack of compatibility and consumer involvement in selecting their assistive technology devices. This study aims to understand older adults’ perceptions and preferences of technologies that can potentially assess frailty at home. Methods This study collected qualitative data through focus group meetings with 15 participants ages 65 and older. Researchers asked participants questions to achieve the goal of understanding their attitudes on the technologies. These questions include (1) the concerns or barriers of installing and using the presented technology in daily life at home, (2) the reasons participants like or dislike a particular technology, (3) what makes a specific technology more acceptable, and (4) participants’ preferences in choosing technologies. Data were transcribed, coded and categorized, and finally synthesized to understand the attitudes towards presented technologies. Results Three focus group sessions were conducted with five participants in each session. In the findings, the attitudes and perspectives of participants on the technologies for assessing frailty were categorized into four themes: (A) general attitude towards using the technologies, (B) conditions for accepting certain technologies, (C) existing living habits or patterns related to using the technologies, and (D) constructive suggestions related to the technologies. Conclusions Participants generally had positive attitudes towards allowing the technologies to be installed and used at their homes. They would accept some technologies if used under certain conditions. However, questions and concerns remain, such as concerns about privacy, functionality, and aesthetics. The study also found that older adults’ living habits or patterns could affect the design and use of technology. Lastly, many valuable suggestions have been made by participants. These perspectives and insights can help improve the design and adoption of home-based frailty assessment technologies among older adults.

Latina Adolescents' Plans, Barriers, and Supports: A Focus Group Study

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen H. McWhirter ◽  
Marina Valdez ◽  
Alisia R. Caban ◽  
Christina L. Aranda
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Latina Adolescents

Parenting Meeting Development Module

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Mela Susanti ◽  
Imas Kania Rahman ◽  
Ibdalsyah Ibdalsyah
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Data Collection Tool ◽  
Ibn Sina ◽  
Activity Program ◽  
Coaching Activities ◽  
At Home

<p class="15bIsiAbstractBInggris">The purpose of this research is to find out how parents were coaching activities in Raudatul Atfal (RA). Darul Muttaqien and RA. Ibn Sina. The research method used in this study is qualitative field research—data collection tool through observation, interviews and documentation. The Parenting Meeting (KPO) coaching module has been tested for validity through a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with four experts: religious experts, linguists, psychologists and education experts. The results of this study are coaching parents in RA. Darul Muttaqien Parung has not been systematically planning on an activity program sheet. 80% of parents state that the child's development at home is the same as the school. While fostering parents in RA. Ibnu Sina Pamijahan has been going well, planned and systematic; 50% of parents statements is that the development of morals at home is not the same as the school.</p><p class="16aJudulAbstrak"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana orang tua pembinaan kegiatan di Raudatul Atfal (RA). Darul Muttaqien dan RA. Ibnu Sina. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam studi ini adalah penelitian lapangan kualitatif. Alat pengumpulan data melalui pengamatan, wawancara dan dokumentasi. The Parenting Meeting (KPO) modul pembinaan telah diuji untuk validitas melalui Focus Group diskusi (FGD) dengan 4 ahli: ahli agama, linguis, psikolog dan ahli pendidikan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pembinaan orang tua di RA. Darul Muttaqien Parung belum direncanakan secara sistematis pada lembar program kegiatan. 80% orang tua menyatakan bahwa perkembangan anak di rumah sama dengan sekolah. Sementara, membina orang tua di RA. Ibnu Sina Pamijahan telah berjalan dengan baik, terencana dan sistematis, 50% dari pernyataan orang tua adalah bahwa perkembangan moral di rumah tidak sama dengan sekolah</p>

Parental perspective about paediatric vaccination : a focus group study in Brussels

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-17
Author(s):  
I Castroviejo Fernández ◽  
S Jourdain ◽  
N Kacenelenbogen ◽  
PR Smeesters
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document