scholarly journals A devolved model for public involvement in the field of mental health research: case study learning

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1302-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Moule ◽  
Rosie Davies
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Mental Health Research

Strategic planning in LAMIC mental health research: A Ghana case study

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-156
Author(s):  
Adote Anum ◽  
Melissa Washington-Nortey ◽  
Vivian Dzokoto
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research

Mental health research inThe Lancet: A case study

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Griffiths ◽  
Michelle Banfield ◽  
Liana Leach
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research

Global neuroscience and mental health research: a bibliometrics case study

2016 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 515-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M. J. Buchan ◽  
Eva Jurczyk ◽  
Ruth Isserlin ◽  
Gary D. Bader
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research

scholarly journals Patient and Public Involvement in Youth Mental Health Research: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Practices and Impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Célia M. D. Sales ◽  
Filipa Martins ◽  
Marisa M. Alves ◽  
Sara Carletto ◽  
Sonia Conejo-Cerón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Young People ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Patient And Public Involvement ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Meta Analyses

Various health settings have advocated for involving patients and members of the public (PPI) in research as a means to increase quality and relevance of the produced knowledge. However, youth PPI has been an understudied area. This protocol paper describes a new project that aims to summarize what is known about PPI with young people in mental health research. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement guidelines we will identify and appraise suitable articles and extract and synthesize relevant information including at least two reviewers at each stage of the process. Results will be presented in two systematic reviews that will describe (a) how youth PPI has been conducted (Review1) and (b) what impact youth PPI had on the subsequent research and on stakeholders (Review2). To our knowledge, this is the first set of reviews that uses a critical appraisal tool, which is co-developed with children and young people. Findings from this project will provide valuable insights and set out the key steps to adopting adequate PPI methods when involving children and young people in mental health research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document