scholarly journals Patterns of sulfur isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate reduction

Geobiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Bradley ◽  
W. D. Leavitt ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
A. H. Knoll ◽  
P. R. Girguis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Isotope ◽  
Microbial Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Sulfur Isotope Fractionation

scholarly journals Effects of Iron and Nitrogen Limitation on Sulfur Isotope Fractionation during Microbial Sulfate Reduction

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (23) ◽  
pp. 8368-8376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Sub Sim ◽  
Shuhei Ono ◽  
Tanja Bosak
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Fixation ◽  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Isotope ◽  
Isotope Effects ◽  
Reducing Power ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Microbial Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Sulfur Isotope Fractionation ◽  
S Isotope

ABSTRACTSulfate-reducing microbes utilize sulfate as an electron acceptor and produce sulfide that is depleted in heavy isotopes of sulfur relative to sulfate. Thus, the distribution of sulfur isotopes in sediments can trace microbial sulfate reduction (MSR), and it also has the potential to reflect the physiology of sulfate-reducing microbes. This study investigates the relationship between the availability of iron and reduced nitrogen and the magnitude of S-isotope fractionation during MSR by a marine sulfate-reducing bacterium, DMSS-1, aDesulfovibriospecies, isolated from salt marsh in Cape Cod, MA. Submicromolar levels of iron increase sulfur isotope fractionation by about 50% relative to iron-replete cultures of DMSS-1. Iron-limited cultures also exhibit decreased cytochromec-to-total protein ratios and cell-specific sulfate reduction rates (csSRR), implying changes in the electron transport chain that couples carbon and sulfur metabolisms. When DMSS-1 fixes nitrogen in ammonium-deficient medium, it also produces larger fractionation, but it occurs at faster csSRRs than in the ammonium-replete control cultures. The energy and reducing power required for nitrogen fixation may be responsible for the reverse trend between S-isotope fractionation and csSRR in this case. Iron deficiency and nitrogen fixation by sulfate-reducing microbes may lead to the large observed S-isotope effects in some euxinic basins and various anoxic sediments.

Sulfur isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate reduction by toluene-degrading bacteria

2001 ◽  
Vol 65 (19) ◽  
pp. 3289-3298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christof Bolliger ◽  
Martin H. Schroth ◽  
Stefano M. Bernasconi ◽  
Jutta Kleikemper ◽  
Josef Zeyer
Keyword(s):  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Isotope ◽  
Microbial Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Sulfur Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Degrading Bacteria

scholarly journals Large sulfur isotope fractionation by bacterial sulfide oxidation

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. eaaw1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Pellerin ◽  
Gilad Antler ◽  
Simon Agner Holm ◽  
Alyssa J. Findlay ◽  
Peter W. Crockford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Metabolic Activity ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Isotope ◽  
Sulfide Oxidation ◽  
Microbial Oxidation ◽  
General Consensus ◽  
Microbial Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Sulfur Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Intermediates

A sulfide-oxidizing microorganism, Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus (DA), generates a consistent enrichment of sulfur-34 (34S) in the produced sulfate of +12.5 per mil or greater. This observation challenges the general consensus that the microbial oxidation of sulfide does not result in large 34S enrichments and suggests that sedimentary sulfides and sulfates may be influenced by metabolic activity associated with sulfide oxidation. Since the DA-type sulfide oxidation pathway is ubiquitous in sediments, in the modern environment, and throughout Earth history, the enrichments and depletions in 34S in sediments may be the combined result of three microbial metabolisms: microbial sulfate reduction, the disproportionation of external sulfur intermediates, and microbial sulfide oxidation.

The effect of pantothenate on sulfate metabolism and sulfur isotope fractionation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1979 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1139-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. L. McCready ◽  
G. A. Din ◽  
H. R. Krouse
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Lipid Content ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Isotope ◽  
Unsaturated Fatty Acids ◽  
Cellular Lipid ◽  
Sulfur Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfate Metabolism

Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in minimal salts – glucose – SO42− medium with varying concentrations of pantothenate (0–1000 μg/L) produced changes in the cellular lipid content and in the ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids. Substantial differences in SO42−diffusion were also observed with changes in pantothenate concentration. During sulfate reduction, the δ34S value of the evolved sulfide varied with the pantothenate concentration ranging from −31‰ in the absence of pantothenate to 0‰ at 400−1000 μg/L pantothenate. The isotope selectivity is related to the effect of pantothenate concentration on cellular metabolism.

scholarly journals Diversity of Sulfur Isotope Fractionations by Sulfate-Reducing Prokaryotes

2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 888-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Detmers ◽  
Volker Brüchert ◽  
Kirsten S. Habicht ◽  
Jan Kuever
Keyword(s):  
Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Sulfur Isotope ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Sulfate Reduction Rate ◽  
Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction ◽  
Systematic Effect ◽  
Sulfate Reducers ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Sulfur Isotope Fractionation

ABSTRACT Batch culture experiments were performed with 32 different sulfate-reducing prokaryotes to explore the diversity in sulfur isotope fractionation during dissimilatory sulfate reduction by pure cultures. The selected strains reflect the phylogenetic and physiologic diversity of presently known sulfate reducers and cover a broad range of natural marine and freshwater habitats. Experimental conditions were designed to achieve optimum growth conditions with respect to electron donors, salinity, temperature, and pH. Under these optimized conditions, experimental fractionation factors ranged from 2.0 to 42.0‰. Salinity, incubation temperature, pH, and phylogeny had no systematic effect on the sulfur isotope fractionation. There was no correlation between isotope fractionation and sulfate reduction rate. The type of dissimilatory bisulfite reductase also had no effect on fractionation. Sulfate reducers that oxidized the carbon source completely to CO2 showed greater fractionations than sulfate reducers that released acetate as the final product of carbon oxidation. Different metabolic pathways and variable regulation of sulfate transport across the cell membrane all potentially affect isotope fractionation. Previous models that explained fractionation only in terms of sulfate reduction rates appear to be oversimplified. The species-specific physiology of each sulfate reducer thus needs to be taken into account to understand the regulation of sulfur isotope fractionation during dissimilatory sulfate reduction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document