Crises, Liquidity Shocks, and Fire Sales at Commercial Banks

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Boyson ◽  
Jean Helwege ◽  
Jan Jindra
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Boyson ◽  
Jean Helwege ◽  
Jan Jindra

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 2150002
Author(s):  
Zhongzhi Song

This paper examines the impact of banks’ lending incentives on asset prices and bank cash holdings under liquidity risk. Banks make lending decisions based on the tradeoff between costs (fire sales of illiquid assets) and benefits (high returns from bank loans). This paper shows fire sales of assets can be an endogenous outcome, even if banks are endowed with enough cash to meet liquidity shocks. This paper also helps explain why banks have kept a large amount of cash without lending after government capital injections in the 2008 financial crisis. The model further provides policy implications for government intervention.


Author(s):  
Nicole M. Boyson ◽  
Jean Helwege ◽  
Jan Jindra

Author(s):  
Pavla Vodová

The recent financial crisis has shown that a liquidity risk plays an important role in the current developed financial system. One of the efficient tools of liquidity risk management is stress testing which can show banks their potential vulnerability to liquidity shocks. The aim of this paper is therefore to measure the liquidity risk sensitivity of Czech commercial banks and to find out the most severe scenario and the most vulnerable bank. Our sample included significant part of the Czech banking sector; we used unconsolidated balance sheet data over the period from 2000 to 2011 which were obtained from annual reports of Czech banks. We have evaluated liquidity risk of each bank in the sample via six different liquidity ratios. Then we stressed these baseline values in three stress scenarios: run on a bank (simulated by a 20% withdrawal of deposits), confidence crisis on the interbank market (simulated by a withdrawal of 20% of interbank deposits) and use of committed loans by counterparties (simulated by a 5% increase of loans provided to nonbank clients). We measured the impact of all scenarios by relative change of liquidity ratios. The impact of modelled liquidity shocks differs among scenarios. The most serious liquidity problems would be caused by the first scenario – run on a bank. The negative influence of third scenario (use of committed loans) is less severe. The confidence crisis on the interbank market would not affect bank liquidity at all. The results also show that the severity of the impact of all scenarios worsens in periods of financial distress. We have also found that large and medium sized banks are most vulnerable to liquidity shocks, mainly to massive deposit withdrawals.


PRODUCTIVITY ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-197
Author(s):  
M. SELVAKUMAR ◽  
◽  
P. ANBUCHEZHIENKAMARAJ ◽  
V. Sathyalakshmi ◽  
R. Mohammed Abubakkar Siddique ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 123-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ageeva ◽  
A. Mishura

We examine the spatial distribution of banks in Russian regions to identify the factors that affect changing territorial architecture of the banking system. The object of the study is dynamics of the number of commercial banks and their branches in 1991-2016. Besides the well-known tendency of concentration of the banking business in Moscow and reducing the number of banks in other regions we analyzed situation in the federal districts taking as an example the Siberian Federal District. This approach allowed us to formulate hypotheses about the causes of differences in the availability of banking institutions in Russian regions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document