Interobserver Agreement of Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Deep Digital Flexor Tendon Pathology

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
J.K. Whitmore ◽  
S.G. Dakin ◽  
R. Weller ◽  
T.S. Mair ◽  
C.E. Sherlock
2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Brisson ◽  
S. G. Nykamp ◽  
D. Reynolds

Summary Objectives: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is reported to be superior to myelography to determine the location and site of first time disc herniation, comparison of these diagnostic methods in cases of recurrent intervertebral disc disease (IVD) herniation after a first surgery has not been evaluated. The objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and myelography in a series of dogs undergoing repeat surgical decompression for recurrent IVD extrusion when compared to the gold standard of surgery. Methods: Ten dogs with recurrent IVD herniation underwent MRI and myelography followed by surgical decompression. Three observers reviewed the images to determine the site and side of the first surgery and the recurrent lesion. Agreement was determined by calculating a kappa (κ) score. Results: Substantial interobserver agreement was noted for recurrent lesion site using MRI and myelography (κ = 0.77 vs. 0.73) and when comparing MRI and myelography to the reported surgical site (κ = 0.73 vs. 0.67). Interobserver agreement was greater with MRI for circumferential location compared to myelography (κ = 0.76 vs. 0.43), similar to what was found when comparing to surgical side (κ = 0.82 vs. 0.49). The previous surgical site in this study had no effect on ability to identify the new lesion. Clinical significance: Despite the limitations of MRI, there was greater agreement between observers using MRI for both the recurrent and first lesion.


Author(s):  
Andrew R. Stephens ◽  
Kristin L. Buterbaugh ◽  
Joshua A. Gordon ◽  
David R. Steinberg ◽  
David J. Bozentka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rens Bexkens ◽  
F. Joseph Simeone ◽  
Denise Eygendaal ◽  
Michel PJ van den Bekerom ◽  
Luke S Oh ◽  
...  

Aim (1) To determine the interobserver reliability of magnetic resonance classifications and lesion instability criteria for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans lesions and (2) to assess differences in reliability between subgroups. Methods Magnetic resonance images of 20 patients with capitellar osteochondritis dissecans were reviewed by 33 observers, 18 orthopaedic surgeons and 15 musculoskeletal radiologists. Observers were asked to classify the osteochondritis dissecans according to classifications developed by Hepple, Dipaola/Nelson, Itsubo, as well as to apply the lesion instability criteria of DeSmet/Kijowski and Satake. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the multirater kappa (k) coefficient. Results Interobserver agreement ranged from slight to fair: Hepple (k = 0.23); Dipaola/Nelson (k = 0.19); Itsubo (k = 0.18); DeSmet/Kijowksi (k = 0.16); Satake (k = 0.12). When classifications/instability criteria were dichotomized into either a stable or unstable osteochondritis dissecans, there was more agreement for Hepple (k = 0.52; p = .002), Dipaola/Nelson (k = 0.38; p = .015), DeSmet/Kijowski (k = 0.42; p = .001) and Satake (k = 0.41; p < .001). Overall, agreement was not associated with the number of years in practice or the number of osteochondritis dissecans cases encountered per year (p > .05). Conclusion One should be cautious when assigning grades using magnetic resonance classifications for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans. When making treatment decisions, one should rather use relatively simple distinctions (e.g. stable versus unstable osteochondritis dissecans; lateral wall intact versus not intact), as these are more reliable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek ◽  
Lamiaa Galal El-Serougy ◽  
Gehad Ahmad Saleh ◽  
Rihame Abd el-wahab ◽  
Walaa Shabana

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 555-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart D. Miller ◽  
Marnix Van Holsbeeck ◽  
Peter M. Boruta ◽  
Kent K. Wu ◽  
David A. Katcherian

We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for investigating pathology in the posterior tibial tendon by comparing the preoperative ultrasonograms for 17 patients with their recorded surgical findings. In all cases, the surgical findings confirmed the ultrasonographic diagnoses: 3 inflammations, 4 partial tears, and 10 ruptures. Interestingly, two ruptures had been undiagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasonography, which seems to be a reliable means of visualizing the extent of pathology of the symptomatic posterior tibial tendon, may be a valuable tool in surgical planning.


2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel C. Murray ◽  
Bridget L. Roberts ◽  
Michael C. Schramme ◽  
Sue J. Dyson ◽  
Marion Branch

1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 292-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Yozsa ◽  
B Lehnert ◽  
D Resnick

The authors review various pedal conditions affecting the rearfoot, including plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendon pathology, fractures, arthritides, coalitions, and tumors. Various diagnostic imaging modalities such as routine radiography, radionuclide bone scanning, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-105
Author(s):  
Hassanin Alkaduhimi ◽  
Aïmane Saarig ◽  
Ihsan Amajjar ◽  
Just A. van der Linde ◽  
Marieke F. van Wier ◽  
...  

Background: Our aim is to determine the interobserver reliability for surgeons to detect Hill-Sachs lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the certainty of judgement, and the effects of surgeon characteristics on agreement. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with Hill-Sachs lesions or other lesions with a similar appearance on MRIs were presented to 20 surgeons without any patient characteristics. The surgeons answered questions on the presence of Hill-Sachs lesions and the certainty of diagnosis. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the Fleiss’ kappa (κ) and percentage of agreement. Agreement between surgeons was compared using a technique similar to the pairwise t-test for means, based on large-sample linear approximation of Fleiss' kappa, with Bonferroni correction. Results: The agreement between surgeons in detecting Hill-Sachs lesions on MRI was fair (69% agreement; κ, 0.304; p<0.001). In 84% of the cases, surgeons were certain or highly certain about the presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion. Conclusions: Although surgeons reported high levels of certainty for their ability to detect Hill-Sachs lesions, there was only a fair amount of agreement between surgeons in detecting Hill-Sachs lesions on MRI. This indicates that clear criteria for defining Hill-Sachs lesions are lacking, which hampers accurate diagnosis and can compromise treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document