Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Evaluations of Zone II Partial Flexor Tendon Lacerations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Stephens ◽  
Kristin L. Buterbaugh ◽  
Joshua A. Gordon ◽  
David R. Steinberg ◽  
David J. Bozentka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Zone Ii

Magnetic resonance imaging scanning in the diagnosis of zone II flexor tendon rupture

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani S. Matloub ◽  
William W. Dzwierzynski ◽  
Scott Erickson ◽  
James R. Sanger ◽  
N. John Yousif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Flexor Tendon Rupture ◽  
Zone Ii ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning

Quantitative Evaluation of Equine Deep Digital Flexor Tendon Morphology using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel C. Murray ◽  
Bridget L. Roberts ◽  
Michael C. Schramme ◽  
Sue J. Dyson ◽  
Marion Branch
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings After Elbow Dislocation: A Descriptive Study

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472094996
Author(s):  
Cory Demino ◽  
John R. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Elbow Dislocation ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Joint Effusion ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Collateral Ligament

Background The elbow is one of the most commonly dislocated joints, and dislocation is usually accompanied with an assortment of soft tissue injuries. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze and describe the patterns of ligamentous, tendinous, and muscular injuries in patients with an acute elbow dislocation and subsequent magnetic resonance image (MRI) evaluation. Methods From 2008 to 2020, 235 patients clinically diagnosed with an elbow dislocation were seen in the department, of which only 19 underwent an MRI of the affected elbow. Twelve patients met inclusion criteria, and MRIs were evaluated by both a radiologist and an upper extremity orthopedic surgeon. Magnetic resonance images were assessed for injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL); radial collateral ligament (RCL); lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL); common flexor and extensor tendons; biceps, brachialis, and triceps tendons; fracture; and joint effusion. Results Magnetic resonance imaging findings included the following: UCL was injured in 11 of 12 patients; RCL was injured in 9 of 12 patients; LUCL was injured in 9 of 12 patients; common flexor tendon was injured in 11 of 12 patients; and common extensor tendon was injured in 9 of 12 elbows. The biceps, brachialis, and triceps tendons showed injury in 1 of 12, 2 of 12, and 2 of 12 elbows, respectively. Four elbows had at least 1 fracture present, whereas 8 demonstrated an effusion. Conclusions In this series, injuries to the UCL and common flexor tendon were most common. Although ligamentous injuries are exceedingly common in elbow dislocations, large studies of MRI findings prove difficult due to MRI costs.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Ultrasonographic and Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Podotrochlear Apparatus of Horses With Foot Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Evrard ◽  
Zoë Joostens ◽  
Maxime Vandersmissen ◽  
Fabrice Audigié ◽  
Valeria Busoni
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Compact Bone ◽  
Navicular Bone ◽  
Foot Pain ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Radiographic Diagnosis ◽  
Signal Change

This prospective study aimed to blindly compare the ultrasonographic and standing magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) findings in deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), navicular bone, and navicular bursa in horses with foot pain, positive digital analgesia, and without definitive radiographic diagnosis. Ultrasonography detected more DDFT abnormalities (32/34 feet vs. 27/34 with sMRI) but identified less palmar navicular abnormalities (23/34 feet vs. 30/34 with sMRI). In suprasesamoidean DDFT lesions, which were mainly dorsally located, changes in echogenicity did not correspond to a particular pattern of sMRI signal change. Transcuneal ultrasonography did not allow assessment of morphology and extent of distal DDFT lesions, and sporadically discriminated the affected lobe compared to sMRI. Defects of the palmar compact bone were identified with both modalities except a parasagittal defect, which was only seen at sMRI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document