Geographic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in Pacific field crickets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mounica V. Kota ◽  
Justa L. Heinen‐Kay ◽  
Marlene Zuk
1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2697-2700 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Cade ◽  
Michael G. Tyshenko

Hybridization was attempted between three geographically separated field cricket populations having males that produce distinct songs. Gryllus integer from central Texas and G. rubens from Arkansas produced many offspring in both reciprocal crosses. Gryllus sp. from New Mexico also produced hybrid offspring in matings with G. integer and G. rubens but at a very low frequency and only in crosses where the female was Gryllus sp. In previous experiments, G. integer from California was unable to hybridize with G. integer from Texas and G. rubens.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianna Heggeseth ◽  
Danielle Sim ◽  
Laura Partida ◽  
Luana S. Maroja

Abstract Background The hybridizing field crickets, Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus have several barriers that prevent gene flow between species. The behavioral pre-zygotic mating barrier, where males court conspecifics more intensely than heterospecifics, is important because by acting earlier in the life cycle it has the potential to prevent a larger fraction of hybridization. The mechanism behind such male mate preference is unknown. Here we investigate if the female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile could be the signal behind male courtship. Results While males of the two species display nearly identical CHC profiles, females have different, albeit overlapping profiles and some females (between 15 and 45%) of both species display a male-like profile distinct from profiles of typical females. We classified CHC females profile into three categories: G. firmus-like (F; including mainly G. firmus females), G. pennsylvanicus-like (P; including mainly G. pennsylvanicus females), and male-like (ML; including females of both species). Gryllus firmus males courted ML and F females more often and faster than they courted P females (p < 0.05). Gryllus pennsylvanicus males were slower to court than G. firmus males, but courted ML females more often (p < 0.05) than their own conspecific P females (no difference between P and F). Both males courted heterospecific ML females more often than other heterospecific females (p < 0.05, significant only for G. firmus males). Conclusions Our results suggest that male mate preference is at least partially informed by female CHC profile and that ML females elicit high courtship behavior in both species. Since ML females exist in both species and are preferred over other heterospecific females, it is likely that this female type is responsible for most hybrid offspring production.


Evolution ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Pascoal ◽  
Magdalena Mendrok ◽  
Christopher Mitchell ◽  
Alastair J. Wilson ◽  
John Hunt ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie N. Oswald ◽  
Shannon Rankin ◽  
Jay Barlow
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document