Influence of rapid- and slow-rate resorption collagen membrane in maxillary sinus augmentation

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Dapievi Bresaola ◽  
Mariza Akemi Matsumoto ◽  
Abbas Zahoui ◽  
Claudia Cristina Biguetti ◽  
Hugo Nary-Filho
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Slow Rate ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

scholarly journals Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials: Stem Cell-Derived Osteoinduction or In Vivo Osteoconduction? Novel Insights in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation by Advanced Imaging

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2159
Author(s):  
Giovanna Iezzi ◽  
Antonio Scarano ◽  
Luca Valbonetti ◽  
Serena Mazzoni ◽  
Michele Furlani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Calcium Phosphates ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Native Bone ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Posterior Maxilla

Maxillary sinus augmentation is often necessary prior to implantology procedure, in particular in cases of atrophic posterior maxilla. In this context, bone substitute biomaterials made of biphasic calcium phosphates, produced by three-dimensional additive manufacturing were shown to be highly biocompatible with an efficient osteoconductivity, especially when combined with cell-based tissue engineering. Thus, in the present research, osteoinduction and osteoconduction properties of biphasic calcium-phosphate constructs made by direct rapid prototyping and engineered with ovine-derived amniotic epithelial cells or amniotic fluid cells were evaluated. More in details, this preclinical study was performed using adult sheep targeted to receive scaffold alone (CTR), oAFSMC, or oAEC engineered constructs. The grafted sinuses were explanted at 90 days and a cross-linked experimental approach based on Synchrotron Radiation microCT and histology analysis was performed on the complete set of samples. The study, performed taking into account the distance from native surrounding bone, demonstrated that no significant differences occurred in bone regeneration between oAEC-, oAFMSC-cultured, and Ctr samples and that there was a predominant action of the osteoconduction versus the stem cells osteo-induction. Indeed, it was proven that the newly formed bone amount and distribution decreased from the side of contact scaffold/native bone toward the bulk of the scaffold itself, with almost constant values of morphometric descriptors in volumes more than 1 mm from the border.

scholarly journals Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Ceramic Alloplastic Granules or Paste: An Experimental Study in Rabbits

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Michael Medeiros Costa ◽  
Daniele Botticelli ◽  
Ofer Moses ◽  
Yuki Omori ◽  
Shigeo Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Biological Behavior ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Alloplastic Material ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Beta Tricalcium Phosphate ◽  
Sinus Lifting ◽  
Points Of View

Background: Due to the lack of data comparing the biological behavior of two formulations, granules and paste, of alloplastic graft from microtomographic and histomorphometric points of view, the aim of the present experiment was to compare the histomorphometric and microtomographic healing of two formulations, i.e., granules (MR sites) or paste (MR-inject sites) of an alloplastic graft composed of a combination of beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite used for maxillary sinus lifting. Methods: A sinus lifting procedure was carried out bilaterally in 20 rabbits, and the elevated space was filled with either paste or granules of an alloplastic material. A collagen membrane was placed on the antrostomy and the animals were euthanized after 2 or 10 weeks, 10 animals each group. Microtomographic and histological analyses were performed. Results: Higher proportions of new bone formation were found at the MR, compared to the MR-inject sites both after 2 weeks (2.65 ± 2.89% vs. 0.08 ± 0.12%; p < 0.01) and 10 weeks of healing (34.20 ± 13.86 vs. 23.28 ± 10.35%; p = 0.022). Conclusions: It was concluded that new bone formation was faster in the MR sites, compared to the MR-inject. However, a longer time of healing should be allowed to make final conclusions about the efficiency in bone formation of the paste formulation of the biomaterial used in the present study.

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. e586-e593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia ◽  
Carlos Fernando de A. B. Mourão ◽  
Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Alves ◽  
Suelen Cristina Sartoretto ◽  
Marcelo José P. G. de Uzeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document