NMD Efficiency Influences Bleeding Severity in ITGA2B c. 2659C >T (p. Q887X ) Knock‐in Mice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanli Xie ◽  
Jiang Jiang ◽  
Lijuan Cao ◽  
Miao Jiang ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1097-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Ogura ◽  
Alan Kawarai Lefor ◽  
Mamoru Masuda ◽  
Shigeki Kushimoto

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (15) ◽  
pp. 1593-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Wyseure ◽  
Esther J. Cooke ◽  
Paul J. Declerck ◽  
Niels Behrendt ◽  
Joost C. M. Meijers ◽  
...  

Key Points Degree of TAFI activation in HA is a modifier of hemophilic joint bleeding that inversely affects bleeding severity. Defective TAFI activation in severe congenital HA impairs protection against uPA-mediated fibrinolysis in bleeding joints.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-18
Author(s):  
Dino Mehic ◽  
Stefanie Hofer ◽  
Christof Jungbauer ◽  
Alexandra Kaider ◽  
Helmuth Haslacher ◽  
...  

Introduction: Antigens of the ABO blood group system have an impact on the hemostatic balance. The association of blood group non-O and thrombosis risk is well known. In patients with different bleeding manifestations, an overrepresentation of blood group O has been previously reported (Dentali et al, Semin.Thromb. Hemost, 2013). Nevertheless, the independent effect of the ABO blood group on bleeding severity, when considering VWF as a major contributing factor, has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Patients with bleeding of unknown cause (BUC) have a similar bleeding phenotype as patients with a diagnosis of an established bleeding disorder, but the causes underlying their bleeding tendency are currently unclear and might be multifactorial (Gebhart et al, Haemophilia, 2018). Thus, we investigated the prevalence of blood group O and its role as an independent risk factor for increased bleeding severity in a thoroughly characterized cohort of patients with BUC. Methods: For this analysis, we selected all patients with normal results in the assessments of plasmatic coagulation and platelet function consecutively recruited between October 2009 and April 2019 within the Vienna bleeding biobank study (Figure 1; Gebhart et al, Haemophilia, 2018). After informed consent, all patients underwent a structured interview on their previous medical and bleeding history including the assessment of the bleeding severity with the Vicenza bleeding assessment tool (BAT). Biomaterial was processed and stored according to standard operating procedures at the Biobank facility (http://www.biobank.at/). A thorough hemostatic laboratory assessment and measurements of thrombin generation, plasma clot properties, and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), as well as platelet function tests (PFA-100, light transmission aggregometry) were performed. Data on the blood group distribution of 23,145 healthy first-time blood donors were provided by the Austrian Red Cross for comparison. Results: We observed an overrepresentation of blood group O in 199 out of 422 BUC patients (47.2%) compared to 8709 out of 23,145 healthy blood donors (37.6%), odds ratio for blood group O 1.48; 95% CI=1.22-1.79, p<0.001 (Table 1). Blood group O in comparison to non-blood group O was independently associated with an increased bleeding severity (least square mean [95% CI]: 6.2 [5.8-6.6] vs. 5.3 [4.9-5.7], p=0.006) and a higher number of bleeding symptoms (least square (LS) mean [95% CI] 3.5 [3.2-3.7] vs. 3.0 [2.8-3.2], p=0.016), after adjustment for sex, VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII activity (Table 2). The prevalence of oral mucosal bleeding was significantly higher in blood group O than in patients with a non-O blood group (26.1% vs. 14.3%), even after adjustment for sex, VWF and FVIII, and multiple testing (p=0.013). When analyzing the influence of blood group O on tests of global hemostatic capacity, results indicated increased clot firmness and reduced lysis in blood group O patients. In ROTEM, the maximum clot firmness was higher (LS mean [95% CI]: 57.4 [56.5-58.3] vs. 55.8 [55.0-56.6] mm, p<0.05) and the maximal lysis lower (LS mean [95% CI]: 13.3 [12.5-14.1] vs. 15.1 [14.4-15.9] %, p<0.05) in patients with blood group O compared to non-O patients, after adjustment for sex, VWF and FVIII, and correction for multiple testing. Also in the analysis of plasma clot properties, the maximum clot absorbance was increased in patients with blood group O after adjustment for sex, VWF and FVIII (LS mean [95% CI]: 0.77 [0.74-0.79] vs 0.71 [0.69-0.74] OD, p<0.05), whereas there was no difference in plasma clot lysis. There was no difference in thrombin generation between BUC patients with blood group O and non-O. We could not identify any differences in platelet function, as assessed by the platelet function analyser-100 and light transmission aggregometry between patients with blood group O in comparison to non-O patients after adjustment for sex, VWF and FVIII, and correction for multiple testing. Conclusion : Blood group O is a risk factor for a more severe bleeding phenotype, especially oral mucosal bleeding, independent of VWF and FVIII levels in patients with BUC. Alterations in global hemostatic capacity in BUC patients with blood group O were identified, whereas platelet function was not different. Our data are important for a better understanding of underlying mechanisms of bleeding in BUC patients, which are most probably multifactorial. Disclosures Jilma: True North Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: reimbursement for travel costs for scientific presentations; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Other: reimbursement for travel costs for scientific presentations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1092-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Bartoszko ◽  
Duminda N. Wijeysundera ◽  
Keyvan Karkouti ◽  
Jeannie Callum ◽  
Vivek Rao ◽  
...  

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Research into major bleeding during cardiac surgery is challenging due to variability in how it is scored. Two consensus-based clinical scores for major bleeding: the Universal definition of perioperative bleeding and the European Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (E-CABG) bleeding severity grade, were compared in this substudy of the Transfusion Avoidance in Cardiac Surgery (TACS) trial. Methods As part of TACS, 7,402 patients underwent cardiac surgery at 12 hospitals from 2014 to 2015. We examined content validity by comparing scored items, construct validity by examining associations with redo and complex procedures, and criterion validity by examining 28-day in-hospital mortality risk across bleeding severity categories. Hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed that incorporated important predictors and categories of bleeding. Results E-CABG and Universal scores were correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.78, P < 0.0001), but E-CABG classified 910 (12.4%) patients as having more severe bleeding, whereas the Universal score classified 1,729 (23.8%) as more severe. Higher E-CABG and Universal scores were observed in redo and complex procedures. Increasing E-CABG and Universal scores were associated with increased mortality in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Regression model discrimination based on predictors of perioperative mortality increased with additional inclusion of the Universal score (c-statistic increase from 0.83 to 0.91) or E-CABG (c-statistic increase from 0.83 to 0.92). When other major postoperative complications were added to these models, the association between Universal or E-CABG bleeding with mortality remained. Conclusions Although each offers different advantages, both the Universal score and E-CABG performed well in the validity assessments, supporting their use as outcome measures in clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Daniel Del Gaizo ◽  
Mark Christopher Hermann ◽  
Maximilian Y. Emmert

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962093634
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Del Gaizo ◽  
William D. Spotnitz ◽  
Rachel W. Hoffman ◽  
Mark Christopher Hermann ◽  
Linda S. Sher ◽  
...  

The SPOT GRADE (SG), a Surface Bleeding Severity Scale, is a unique visual method for assessing bleeding severity based on quantitative determinations of blood flow. This study assessed the reliability of the SG scale in a clinical setting and collected initial data on the safety and efficacy of HEMOBLAST Bellows (HB), a hemostatic agent, in abdominal and orthopedic operations. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled across 3 centers and received the investigational device. Bleeding severity and hemostasis were independently assessed by 2 surgical investigators at baseline and at 3, 6, and 10 minutes after application of HB and compared for agreement. The mean paired κ statistic for assignment of SG scores was .7754. The mean paired κ statistics for determining eligibility for participation in the trial based on bleeding severity and the mean paired κ statistics determining the presence of hemostasis were .9301 and .9301, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving hemostasis within 3, 6, and 10 minutes of HB application were 50.0%, 79.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects and one possible serious adverse device effect, as determined by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC). The reliability of the SG scale was validated in a clinical setting. Initial data on the safety and efficacy of HB in abdominal and orthopedic operations were collected, and there were no concerns raised by the investigators or the IDMC.


Transfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-649
Author(s):  
Frank E.H.P. Baarle ◽  
Emma K. Weerdt ◽  
Bram Suurmond ◽  
Marcella C.A. Müller ◽  
Alexander P.J. Vlaar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document