scholarly journals Decision-making for non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Hong Kong Chinese women's preferences for individualvsrelational autonomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Y.C. Lau ◽  
H. Yi ◽  
S. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Hong Kong Chinese ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Women’S Preferences

Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Twiss ◽  
Melissa Hill ◽  
Rebecca Daley ◽  
Lyn S. Chitty
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Review of: Kaposy C. (2018) Choosing Down Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
Meghan Chevalier
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Pragmatic Approach ◽  
Social Disability ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
The Social

With the advent of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Chris Kaposy believes that more people should choose to parent children with Down Syndrome. Kaposy advocates for the Social Disability Model and recommends a normative pragmatic approach as standard. He makes use of both quantitative and qualitative evidence to support his position.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Implementation Strategies of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Down Syndrome Screening Programmes

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke Mersy ◽  
Christine E.M. de Die-Smulders ◽  
Audrey B.C. Coumans ◽  
Luc J.M. Smits ◽  
Guido M.W.R. de Wert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Down Syndrome Screening

Budget impact of incorporating non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening for Down syndrome in Turkey

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-407
Author(s):  
Zeynep Guldem Okem ◽  
Gokcen Orgul ◽  
Berna Tari Kasnakoglu ◽  
Mehmet Cakar ◽  
Mehmet Sinan Beksac
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Non Invasive

Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 781-782
Author(s):  
Dagmar Schmitz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Public Funding ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Financial Barriers ◽  
Non Invasive

Bunnik and colleagues argued that financial barriers do not promote informed decision-making prior to prenatal screening and raise justice concerns. If public funding is provided, however, it would seem to be important to clarify its intentions and avoid any unwarranted appearance of a medical utility of the testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document