scholarly journals The Abelam: A Study in Local Differentiation

1965 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. M. Lea
2018 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oguz Turkozan ◽  
Can Yılmaz ◽  
Aşkın Hasan Uçar ◽  
Carlos Carreras ◽  
Serap Ergene ◽  
...  

Plant Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sotiriou ◽  
E. Giannoutsou ◽  
E. Panteris ◽  
B. Galatis ◽  
P. Apostolakos

1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
AHD Brown

The recent emergence of molecular techniques for obtaining evidence from DNA sequences to use in systematic studies raises the question of whether the isozyme approach is now superseded. When should the experimental taxonomist spend the limited research dollar on isozymes and when on DNA techniques? The clearest advantages of the latter are the fundamental quality of the data (being directly at the DNA level), and their potential use at all levels of the taxonomic hierarchy. The relative advantages of isozyme techniques are their lower cost, ease and rapidity. Isozymes are most suited to addressing questions at the level of populations, subspecies and species, and only of limited use at higher levels. Yet it is precisely the species level where the systematist is often seeking a variety of evidence to support taxonomic concepts. The capacity to handle a large number of samples, in a directly comparative fashion, means that isozymes are ideal for studying microevolutionary processes such as mating system, migration, local differentiation and hybridisation. These processes act on all kinds of variation, and knowing about them will assist a taxonomist's approach to other levels of evidence. Finally isozyme analysis is useful in the design of sampling strategies and the choice of samples for in-depth molecular analysis. These points are illustrated by a study of variation in Glycine canescens and polyploid origins within the G. tomentella complex, and of partial cleistogamy in G. argyrea.


Antiquity ◽  
1939 ◽  
Vol 13 (49) ◽  
pp. 58-79
Author(s):  
R. E. M. Wheeler

In recent years considerable attention has been devoted to the problems of the Early Iron Age in the British Isles; and, amongst these problems, that of the relationship between the insular and the continental cultures of the period has not become simpler or clearer as the British evidence has accumulated. How far, and in what manner, were the various Iron Age cultures of Britain derived from the continent? How far, and under what conditions, were they due to local initiative in Britain itself? Until questions such as these can be answered approximately, it will remain impossible alike to estimate the real achievement of the later prehistoric civilization of the island and to visualize the full significance of the adjacent civilization of northwestern Europe. The problem is not an easy one. The agricultural and therefore local basis of most of the Iron Age economy of Britain encouraged the strong local differentiation of cultural forms, and this local individuality was enhanced by the fashion in which the major tracts of open and habitable chalk or greensand tended, in ancient times, to be isolated by expanses of dense and often impassable forest. And, similarly, an intrusive element from overseas might easily take root in a particular area of southern or eastern Britain without directly affecting other areas within a relatively short map-distance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document