Effect of point‐of‐care gastrointestinal ultrasound on decision‐making and management in inflammatory bowel disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony B. Friedman ◽  
Anil Asthana ◽  
Simon R. Knowles ◽  
Aphra Robbins ◽  
Peter R. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals Factors affecting clinical decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease and the role of point-of-care calprotectin

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1756283X1774473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Derwa ◽  
Christopher J.M. Williams ◽  
Ruchit Sood ◽  
Saqib Mumtaz ◽  
M. Hassan Bholah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Objectives: Patient-reported symptoms correlate poorly with mucosal inflammation. Clinical decision-making may, therefore, not be based on objective evidence of disease activity. We conducted a study to determine factors associated with clinical decision-making in a secondary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, using a cross-sectional design. Methods: Decisions to request investigations or escalate medical therapy were recorded from outpatient clinic encounters in a cohort of 276 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). Disease activity was assessed using clinical indices, self-reported flare and faecal calprotectin ≥ 250 µg/g. Demographic, disease-related and psychological factors were assessed using validated questionnaires. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between clinical decision-making and symptoms, mucosal inflammation and psychological comorbidity. Results: Self-reported flare was associated with requesting investigations in CD [odds ratio (OR) 5.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84–17.0] and UC (OR 10.8; 95% CI 1.8–64.3), but mucosal inflammation was not (OR 1.62; 95% CI 0.49–5.39; and OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.21–1.05, respectively). Self-reported flare (OR 7.96; 95% CI 1.84–34.4), but not mucosal inflammation (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.46–6.13) in CD, and clinical disease activity (OR 10.36; 95% CI 2.47–43.5) and mucosal inflammation (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.28–14.2) in UC were associated with escalation of medical therapy. Almost 60% of patients referred for investigation had no evidence of mucosal inflammation. Conclusions: Apart from escalation of medical therapy in UC, clinical decision-making was not associated with mucosal inflammation in IBD. The use of point-of-care calprotectin testing may aid clinical decision-making, improve resource allocation and reduce costs in IBD.

scholarly journals Point‐of‐care gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease: An accurate alternative for disease monitoring

JGH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dharshan Sathananthan ◽  
Arvind Rajagopalan ◽  
Lucinda Van De Ven ◽  
Serena Martin ◽  
James Fon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Disease Monitoring ◽  
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals Gastroenterologists’ Views of Shared Decision Making for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 2636-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey A. Siegel ◽  
Jennifer H. Lofland ◽  
Ahmad Naim ◽  
Jan Gollins ◽  
Danielle M. Walls ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals P430 Feasibility and reliability of gastrointestinal ultrasound in pregnant inflammatory bowel disease patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S391-S393
Author(s):  
F de Voogd ◽  
H Joshi ◽  
E Van Wassenaer ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
K Gecse
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Terminal Ileum ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Active Disease

Abstract Background Disease activity during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with miscarriage, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Monitoring disease activity throughout the pregnancy is therefore important. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) has a high potential as a point-of-care tool for monitoring disease activity in IBD as it has been shown to correlate well with endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. However, data are scarce on the use of GIUS in IBD throughout pregnancy. The aim of this prospective study is to determine the feasibility and reliability of GIUS in pregnant IBD patients. Methods Patients were included when visiting the outpatient IBD pregnancy clinic. At each trimester, clinical and biochemical disease activity was evaluated and GIUS was performed. Feasibility was assessed by the ability to visualise each bowel segment (terminal ileum (TI), ascending (AC), transverse (TC), descending (DC) and sigmoid colon (SC)). Reliability was evaluated by using clinical and biochemical disease activity as a gold standard. This was defined as a Harvey–Bradshaw Index ≥4 in Crohn’s disease (CD) or a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index ≥5 in ulcerative colitis and a faecal calprotectin (FCP)³ 250 mg/g. Bowel wall thickness (BWT) of > 3 mm in the colon and > 2mm in the terminal ileum was considered as signs of active inflammation on ultrasound. A Mann–Whitney U-test and chi-square were used for statistical analysis. Results Thirty-two IBD patients (54% CD) were studied. Both a GIUS and FCP was available in 18, 11 and 6 patients for the first, second and third trimester, respectively. Eleven of 32 (34%) patients had clinically active disease at least at one time point during the pregnancy. Table 1 shows the visibility per segment. When the active disease was defined as an FCP ≥ 250 mg/g, GIUS could distinguish active from the non-active disease in the first, second and third trimester with a sensitivity of 80%, 75% and 75% and specificity of 85%, 86% and 100%, respectively. FCP levels were significantly higher in patients with an active disease on GIUS regardless of the trimester (mean 1095.5 ± 1453.8 mg/g vs. 265.25 ± 649.8 mg/g, p < 0.0001). Conclusion GIUS is accurate to distinguish active from the quiescent disease in pregnancy. Feasibility to visualise the TI and the SC decreased during the second and third trimester, although active disease could still be detected. Consequently, GIUS is feasible and reliable to assess disease activity throughout pregnancy in IBD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document